Literature DB >> 2405678

Ultrasonographic estimation of fetal weight in the clinically macrosomic fetus.

G I Hirata1, A L Medearis, J Horenstein, M B Bear, L D Platt.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to evaluate models for the prediction of birth weight in fetuses suspected of being macrosomic. A total of 141 patients with standard measurements of the head, abdomen, and femur were studied. Linear regressions were performed with single parameters, squares, and all possible cross products in the generation of models with log (birth weight) and birth weight as dependent variables. These models were then compared with a group of previously published equations. Clinically, all models performed poorly. However, two models were significantly less accurate in the prediction of birth weight (p less than or equal to 0.05). The best results were obtained by equations that used abdominal circumference and femur length measurements. There was no improvement in models that contained log (birth weight) or birth weight as dependent variables or models with complex variables such as squares or cross products of measured parameters. In conclusion, when evaluating patients at risk of macrosomia, the best estimates of fetal weight can be obtained by models that contain abdominal circumference and femur length.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2405678     DOI: 10.1016/0002-9378(90)90857-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  5 in total

1.  Ultrasound versus Clinical Examination to Estimate Fetal Weight at Term.

Authors:  Jan-Simon Lanowski; Gabriele Lanowski; Cordula Schippert; Kristina Drinkut; Peter Hillemanns; Ismini Staboulidou
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 2.915

2.  Fetal weight estimation for prediction of fetal macrosomia: does additional clinical and demographic data using pattern recognition algorithm improve detection?

Authors:  Shimon Degani; Dori Peleg; Karina Bahous; Zvi Leibovitz; Israel Shapiro; Gonen Ohel
Journal:  J Prenat Med       Date:  2008-01

3.  Delivery after prior cesarean: maternal morbidity and mortality.

Authors:  Yvonne W Cheng; Karen B Eden; Nicole Marshall; Leonardo Pereira; Aaron B Caughey; Jeanne-Marie Guise
Journal:  Clin Perinatol       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 3.430

4.  Impending macrosomia: will induction of labour modify the risk of caesarean delivery?

Authors:  Y W Cheng; T N Sparks; R K Laros; J M Nicholson; A B Caughey
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2012-01-18       Impact factor: 6.531

5.  Different formulas, different thresholds and different performance-the prediction of macrosomia by ultrasound.

Authors:  A Aviram; Y Yogev; E Ashwal; L Hiersch; D Danon; E Hadar; R Gabbay-Benziv
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2017-09-14       Impact factor: 2.521

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.