Literature DB >> 22439018

Fetal weight estimation for prediction of fetal macrosomia: does additional clinical and demographic data using pattern recognition algorithm improve detection?

Shimon Degani1, Dori Peleg, Karina Bahous, Zvi Leibovitz, Israel Shapiro, Gonen Ohel.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to test whether pattern recognition classifiers with multiple clinical and sonographic variables could improve ultrasound prediction of fetal macrosomia over prediction which relies on the commonly used formulas for the sonographic estimation of fetal weight.
METHODS: THE SVM ALGORITHM WAS USED FOR BINARY CLASSIFICATION BETWEEN TWO CATEGORIES OF WEIGHT ESTIMATION: >4000gr and <4000gr. Clinical and sononographic input variables of 100 pregnancies suspected of having LGA fetuses were tested.
RESULTS: Thirteen out of 38 features were selected as contributing variables that distinguish birth weights of below 4000gr and of 4000gr and above. Considering 4000gr. as a cutoff weight the pattern recognition algorithm predicted macrosomia with a sensitivity of 81%, specificity of 73%, positive predictive value of 81% and negative predictive value of 73%. The comparative figures according to the combined criteria based on two commonly used formulas generated from regression analysis were 88.1%, 34%, 65.8%, 66.7%.
CONCLUSIONS: The SVM algorithm provides a comparable prediction of LGA fetuses as other commonly used formulas generated from regression analysis. The better specificity and better positive predictive value suggest potential value for this method and further accumulation of data may improve the reliability of this approach.

Entities:  

Keywords:  fetal weight estimation; macrosomia; pattern recognition algorithm; ultrasound

Year:  2008        PMID: 22439018      PMCID: PMC3279086     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Prenat Med        ISSN: 1971-3282


  26 in total

1.  Fetal weight estimation and prediction of fetal macrosomia in non-diabetic pregnant women.

Authors:  F Oçer; S Kaleli; E Budak; E Oral
Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 2.435

2.  Ultrasound estimation of fetal weight with the use of computerized artificial neural network model.

Authors:  Louise Chuang; Jeng-Yang Hwang; Chiung-Hsin Chang; Chen-Hsiang Yu; Fong-Ming Chang
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 2.998

3.  The use of a neural network for the ultrasonographic estimation of fetal weight in the macrosomic fetus.

Authors:  R M Farmer; A L Medearis; G I Hirata; L D Platt
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 8.661

4.  Predicting birth weight by fetal upper-arm volume with use of three-dimensional ultrasonography.

Authors:  R I Liang; F M Chang; B L Yao; C H Chang; C H Yu; H C Ko
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 8.661

5.  Incorporating sonographic cheek-to-cheek diameter, biparietal diameter and abdominal circumference improves weight estimation in the macrosomic fetus.

Authors:  J S Abramowicz; K Robischon; C Cox
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 7.299

6.  Ultrasonographic identification of the macrosomic fetus.

Authors:  J M Miller; H L Brown; O F Khawli; J G Pastorek; H A Gabert
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 8.661

7.  Prediction of fetal macrosomia using sonographically measured abdominal subcutaneous tissue thickness.

Authors:  B M Petrikovsky; C Oleschuk; M Lesser; N Gelertner; B Gross
Journal:  J Clin Ultrasound       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 0.910

8.  Sonographic EFW and macrosomia: is there an optimum formula to predict diabetic fetal macrosomia?

Authors:  C A Combs; B Rosenn; M Miodovnik; T A Siddiqi
Journal:  J Matern Fetal Med       Date:  2000 Jan-Feb

9.  Ultrasound diagnosis of fetal macrosomia.

Authors:  P Rosati; C Exacoustós; A Caruso; S Mancuso
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1992-01-01       Impact factor: 7.299

Review 10.  Older maternal age and pregnancy outcome: a review of the literature.

Authors:  J P Hansen
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Surv       Date:  1986-11       Impact factor: 2.347

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.