Literature DB >> 24056273

Electromagnetohydrodynamic modeling of Lorentz effect imaging.

Navid Pourtaheri1, Trong-Kha Truong, Craig S Henriquez.   

Abstract

Lorentz Effect Imaging (LEI) is an MRI technique that has been proposed for direct imaging of neuronal activity. While promising results have been obtained in phantoms and in the human median nerve in vivo, its contrast mechanism is still not fully understood. In this paper, computational model simulations were used to investigate how electromagnetohydrodynamics (EMHD) may explain the LEI contrast. Three computational models of an electrolyte-filled phantom subject to an applied current dipole, synchronized to oscillating magnetic field gradients of an LEI protocol, were developed to determine the velocity and displacement of water molecules as well as the resulting signal loss in an MR image. The simulated images were compared to images from previous LEI phantom experiments with identical properties for different stimulus current amplitudes and polarities. The first model, which evaluated ion trajectories based on Stokes flow using different mobility values, did not generate an appreciable signal loss due to an insufficient number of water molecules associated with the ion hydration shells. The second model, which computed particle drift based on the Lorentz force of charged particles in free space, was able to approximate the magnitude, but not the distribution of signal loss observed in the experimental images. The third model, which computed EMHD based on the Lorentz force and Navier-Stokes equations for flow of a conducting fluid, provided results consistent with both the magnitude and distribution of signal loss seen in the LEI experiments. Our EMHD model further yields information on electrical potential, velocity, displacement, and pressure, which are not readily available in an experiment, thereby providing a robust means to study and optimize LEI for imaging neuronal activity in the human cortex.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Computational modeling; Electromagnetohydrodynamics; Functional magnetic resonance imaging; Lorentz Effect Imaging; Neuronal current MRI; Oscillating magnetic field gradients

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24056273      PMCID: PMC3818387          DOI: 10.1016/j.jmr.2013.08.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Magn Reson        ISSN: 1090-7807            Impact factor:   2.229


  7 in total

1.  Lorentz effect imaging.

Authors:  A W Song; A M Takahashi
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 2.546

2.  Synchronized detection of minute electrical currents with MRI using Lorentz effect imaging.

Authors:  Trong-Kha Truong; Jennifer L Wilbur; Allen W Song
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  2005-12-15       Impact factor: 2.229

3.  Finding neuroelectric activity under magnetic-field oscillations (NAMO) with magnetic resonance imaging in vivo.

Authors:  Trong-Kha Truong; Allen W Song
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-08-07       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Lorentz effect imaging of ionic currents in solution.

Authors:  Trong-Kha Truong; Alexandru Avram; Allen W Song
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  2007-12-23       Impact factor: 2.229

5.  Estimating Motion From MRI Data.

Authors:  Cengizhan Ozturk; J Andrew Derbyshire; Elliot R McVeigh
Journal:  Proc IEEE Inst Electr Electron Eng       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 10.961

6.  Lorentz effect imaging of ionic currents in solution using correct values for ion mobility.

Authors:  Ranjith S Wijesinghe; Bradley J Roth
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  2010-03-01       Impact factor: 2.229

7.  Mechanical model of neural tissue displacement during Lorentz effect imaging.

Authors:  Bradley J Roth; Peter J Basser
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 4.668

  7 in total
  2 in total

1.  Direct detection of neural activity in vitro using magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography (MREIT).

Authors:  Rosalind J Sadleir; Fanrui Fu; Corey Falgas; Stephen Holland; May Boggess; Samuel C Grant; Eung Je Woo
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2017-08-14       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  Magnetic resonance imaging of ionic currents in solution: the effect of magnetohydrodynamic flow.

Authors:  Mukund Balasubramanian; Robert V Mulkern; William M Wells; Padmavathi Sundaram; Darren B Orbach
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2014-10-01       Impact factor: 4.668

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.