Literature DB >> 16894177

Finding neuroelectric activity under magnetic-field oscillations (NAMO) with magnetic resonance imaging in vivo.

Trong-Kha Truong1, Allen W Song.   

Abstract

Neuroimaging techniques are among the most important tools for investigating the function of the human nervous system and for improving the clinical diagnosis of neurological disorders. However, most commonly used techniques are limited by their invasiveness or their inability to accurately localize neural activity in space or time. Previous attempts at using MRI to directly image neuroelectric activity in vivo through the detection of magnetic field changes induced by neuronal currents have been challenging because of the extremely small signal changes and confounding factors such as hemodynamic modulations. Here we describe an MRI technique that uses oscillating magnetic field gradients to significantly amplify and detect the Lorentz effect induced by neuroelectric activity, and we demonstrate its effectiveness in imaging sensory nerve activation in vivo in the human median nerve during electrical stimulation of the wrist. This direct, real-time, and noninvasive neuroimaging technique may potentially find broad applications in neurosciences.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16894177      PMCID: PMC1567924          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0605486103

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  15 in total

1.  Lorentz effect imaging.

Authors:  A W Song; A M Takahashi
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 2.546

2.  MRI detection of weak magnetic fields due to an extended current dipole in a conducting sphere: a model for direct detection of neuronal currents in the brain.

Authors:  Daniel Konn; Penny Gowland; Richard Bowtell
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 4.668

3.  Directly mapping magnetic field effects of neuronal activity by magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Jinhu Xiong; Peter T Fox; Jia-Hong Gao
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Current-induced magnetic resonance phase imaging.

Authors:  J Bodurka; A Jesmanowicz; J S Hyde; H Xu; L Estkowski; S J Li
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 2.229

5.  Hunting for neuronal currents: absence of rapid MRI signal changes during visual-evoked response.

Authors:  Renxin Chu; Jacco A de Zwart; Peter van Gelderen; Masaki Fukunaga; Peter Kellman; Tom Holroyd; Jeff H Duyn
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  Initial attempts at directly detecting alpha wave activity in the brain using MRI.

Authors:  Daniel Konn; Sean Leach; Penny Gowland; Richard Bowtell
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 2.546

7.  Combination of BOLD-fMRI and VEP recordings for spin-echo MRI detection of primary magnetic effects caused by neuronal currents.

Authors:  Marta Bianciardi; Francesco Di Russo; Teresa Aprile; Bruno Maraviglia; Gisela E Hagberg
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 2.546

8.  Investigation of MR signal modulation due to magnetic fields from neuronal currents in the adult human optic nerve and visual cortex.

Authors:  Li Sze Chow; Greg G Cook; Elspeth Whitby; Martyn N J Paley
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2006-03-13       Impact factor: 2.546

9.  In vivo detection of applied electric currents by magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  M Joy; G Scott; M Henkelman
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1989 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.546

10.  Functional brain mapping by blood oxygenation level-dependent contrast magnetic resonance imaging. A comparison of signal characteristics with a biophysical model.

Authors:  S Ogawa; R S Menon; D W Tank; S G Kim; H Merkle; J M Ellermann; K Ugurbil
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 4.033

View more
  16 in total

1.  Failure to direct detect magnetic field dephasing corresponding to ERP generation.

Authors:  Lin Tang; Malcolm J Avison; James C Gatenby; John C Gore
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2008-01-03       Impact factor: 2.546

Review 2.  The role of magnetic forces in biology and medicine.

Authors:  Bradley J Roth
Journal:  Exp Biol Med (Maywood)       Date:  2011-02

3.  Is it possible to detect dendrite currents using presently available magnetic resonance imaging techniques?

Authors:  William I Jay; Ranjith S Wijesinghe; Brain D Dolasinski; Bradley J Roth
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2012-03-24       Impact factor: 2.602

4.  Direct detection of a single evoked action potential with MRS in Lumbricus terrestris.

Authors:  Alexander J Poplawsky; Raymond Dingledine; Xiaoping P Hu
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2011-07-05       Impact factor: 4.044

5.  Electromagnetohydrodynamic modeling of Lorentz effect imaging.

Authors:  Navid Pourtaheri; Trong-Kha Truong; Craig S Henriquez
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  2013-08-28       Impact factor: 2.229

6.  Magnetic resonance imaging of ionic currents in solution: the effect of magnetohydrodynamic flow.

Authors:  Mukund Balasubramanian; Robert V Mulkern; William M Wells; Padmavathi Sundaram; Darren B Orbach
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2014-10-01       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 7.  MRI in multiple sclerosis: current status and future prospects.

Authors:  Rohit Bakshi; Alan J Thompson; Maria A Rocca; Daniel Pelletier; Vincent Dousset; Frederik Barkhof; Matilde Inglese; Charles R G Guttmann; Mark A Horsfield; Massimo Filippi
Journal:  Lancet Neurol       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 44.182

8.  Detection of peripheral nerve and skeletal muscle action currents using magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Ranjith S Wijesinghe; Bradley J Roth
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2009-07-17       Impact factor: 3.934

9.  Characterization of non-hemodynamic functional signal measured by spin-lock fMRI.

Authors:  Tao Jin; Seong-Gi Kim
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2013-04-22       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  Mechanical model of neural tissue displacement during Lorentz effect imaging.

Authors:  Bradley J Roth; Peter J Basser
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 4.668

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.