Kim Freeman1, Wen Tao, Hongli Sun, Mark H Soonpaa, Michael Rubart. 1. Riley Heart Research Center Wells, Center for Pediatric Research, Indiana University School of Medicine, 1044 West Walnut Street, Indianapolis, IN 46202, United States.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Sympathetic nerve wiring in the mammalian heart has remained largely unexplored. Resolving the wiring diagram of the cardiac sympathetic network would help establish the structural underpinnings of neurocardiac coupling. NEW METHOD: We used two-photon excitation fluorescence microscopy, combined with a computer-assisted 3-D tracking algorithm, to map the local sympathetic circuits in living hearts from adult transgenic mice expressing enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP) in peripheral adrenergic neurons. RESULTS: Quantitative co-localization analyses confirmed that the intramyocardial EGFP distribution recapitulated the anatomy of the sympathetic arbor. In the left ventricular subepicardium of the uninjured heart, the sympathetic network was composed of multiple subarbors, exhibiting variable branching and looping topology. Axonal branches did not overlap with each other within their respective parental subarbor nor with neurites of annexed subarbors. The sympathetic network in the border zone of a 2-week-old myocardial infarction was characterized by substantive rewiring, which included spatially heterogeneous loss and gain of sympathetic fibers and formation of multiple, predominately nested, axon loops of widely variable circumference and geometry. COMPARISON WITH EXISTING METHODS: In contrast to mechanical tissue sectioning methods that may involve deformation of tissue and uncertainty in registration across sections, our approach preserves continuity of structure, which allows tracing of neurites over distances, and thus enables derivation of the three-dimensional and topological morphology of cardiac sympathetic nerves. CONCLUSIONS: Our assay should be of general utility to unravel the mechanisms governing sympathetic axon spacing during development and disease.
BACKGROUND: Sympathetic nerve wiring in the mammalian heart has remained largely unexplored. Resolving the wiring diagram of the cardiac sympathetic network would help establish the structural underpinnings of neurocardiac coupling. NEW METHOD: We used two-photon excitation fluorescence microscopy, combined with a computer-assisted 3-D tracking algorithm, to map the local sympathetic circuits in living hearts from adult transgenic mice expressing enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP) in peripheral adrenergic neurons. RESULTS: Quantitative co-localization analyses confirmed that the intramyocardial EGFP distribution recapitulated the anatomy of the sympathetic arbor. In the left ventricular subepicardium of the uninjured heart, the sympathetic network was composed of multiple subarbors, exhibiting variable branching and looping topology. Axonal branches did not overlap with each other within their respective parental subarbor nor with neurites of annexed subarbors. The sympathetic network in the border zone of a 2-week-old myocardial infarction was characterized by substantive rewiring, which included spatially heterogeneous loss and gain of sympathetic fibers and formation of multiple, predominately nested, axon loops of widely variable circumference and geometry. COMPARISON WITH EXISTING METHODS: In contrast to mechanical tissue sectioning methods that may involve deformation of tissue and uncertainty in registration across sections, our approach preserves continuity of structure, which allows tracing of neurites over distances, and thus enables derivation of the three-dimensional and topological morphology of cardiac sympathetic nerves. CONCLUSIONS: Our assay should be of general utility to unravel the mechanisms governing sympathetic axon spacing during development and disease.
Authors: Josephine Herz; Volker Siffrin; Anja E Hauser; Alexander U Brandt; Tina Leuenberger; Helena Radbruch; Frauke Zipp; Raluca A Niesner Journal: Biophys J Date: 2010-02-17 Impact factor: 4.033
Authors: J M Cao; M C Fishbein; J B Han; W W Lai; A C Lai; T J Wu; L Czer; P L Wolf; T A Denton; I P Shintaku; P S Chen; L S Chen Journal: Circulation Date: 2000-04-25 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Gwenaëlle L Clarke; Aritra Bhattacherjee; Sarah E Tague; Wohaib Hasan; Peter G Smith Journal: J Neurosci Date: 2010-09-15 Impact factor: 6.167
Authors: Paul P Lunkenheimer; Klaus Redmann; Natalie Kling; Xiaoji Jiang; Kai Rothaus; Colin W Cryer; Frank Wübbeling; Peter Niederer; Philipp U Heitz; Siew Yen Ho; Robert H Anderson Journal: Anat Rec A Discov Mol Cell Evol Biol Date: 2006-06
Authors: A Hassankhani; M E Steinhelper; M H Soonpaa; E B Katz; D A Taylor; A Andrade-Rozental; S M Factor; J J Steinberg; L J Field; H J Federoff Journal: Dev Biol Date: 1995-05 Impact factor: 3.582
Authors: Charles E Murry; Mark H Soonpaa; Hans Reinecke; Hidehiro Nakajima; Hisako O Nakajima; Michael Rubart; Kishore B S Pasumarthi; Jitka Ismail Virag; Stephen H Bartelmez; Veronica Poppa; Gillian Bradford; Joshua D Dowell; David A Williams; Loren J Field Journal: Nature Date: 2004-03-21 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Suradip Das; Wisberty J Gordián-Vélez; Harry C Ledebur; Foteini Mourkioti; Panteleimon Rompolas; H Isaac Chen; Mijail D Serruya; D Kacy Cullen Journal: NPJ Regen Med Date: 2020-06-05
Authors: Michael Rubart; Wen Tao; Xiao-Long Lu; Simon J Conway; Sean P Reuter; Shien-Fong Lin; Mark H Soonpaa Journal: Cardiovasc Res Date: 2018-03-01 Impact factor: 10.787
Authors: Beth A Habecker; Mark E Anderson; Susan J Birren; Keiichi Fukuda; Neil Herring; Donald B Hoover; Hideaki Kanazawa; David J Paterson; Crystal M Ripplinger Journal: J Physiol Date: 2016-06-17 Impact factor: 5.182