Literature DB >> 24054892

External attentional focus enhances movement automatization: a comprehensive test of the constrained action hypothesis.

E C Kal1, J van der Kamp, H Houdijk.   

Abstract

An external focus of attention has been shown to result in superior motor performance compared to an internal focus of attention. This study investigated whether this is due to enhanced levels of movement automatization, as predicted by the constrained action hypothesis (McNevin, Shea, & Wulf, 2003). Thirty healthy participants performed a cyclic one-leg extension-flexion task with both the dominant and non-dominant leg. Focus of attention was manipulated via instructions. The degree of automatization of movement was assessed by measuring dual task costs as well as movement execution parameters (i.e., EMG activity, movement fluency, and movement regularity). Results revealed that an external focus of attention led to significantly better motor performance (i.e., shorter movement duration) than an internal focus. Although dual task costs of the motor task did not differ as a function of attentional focus, cognitive dual task costs were significantly higher when attention was directed internally. An external focus of attention resulted in more fluent and more regular movement execution than an internal focus, whereas no differences were found concerning muscular activity. These results indicate that an external focus of attention results in more automatized movements than an internal focus and, therefore, provide support for the constrained action hypothesis.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  2330; 234; 2343; Focus of attention; Human performance; Kinematic analysis; Motor control

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24054892     DOI: 10.1016/j.humov.2013.04.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Mov Sci        ISSN: 0167-9457            Impact factor:   2.161


  23 in total

Review 1.  Optimizing performance through intrinsic motivation and attention for learning: The OPTIMAL theory of motor learning.

Authors:  Gabriele Wulf; Rebecca Lewthwaite
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-10

Review 2.  Looking beyond the binary: an extended paradigm for focus of attention in human motor performance.

Authors:  Rebecca Gose; Amit Abraham
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2021-05-16       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  The Impact of Social-Cognitive Stress on Speech Variability, Determinism, and Stability in Adults Who Do and Do Not Stutter.

Authors:  Eric S Jackson; Mark Tiede; Deryk Beal; D H Whalen
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 2.297

4.  Adults who stutter do not stutter during private speech.

Authors:  Eric S Jackson; Lindsay R Miller; Haley J Warner; J Scott Yaruss
Journal:  J Fluency Disord       Date:  2021-09-09       Impact factor: 2.538

Review 5.  Loss of Motor Stability After Sports-Related Concussion: Opportunities for Motor Learning Strategies to Reduce Musculoskeletal Injury Risk.

Authors:  Jason M Avedesian; Harjiv Singh; Jed A Diekfuss; Gregory D Myer; Dustin R Grooms
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2021-08-02       Impact factor: 11.136

6.  Examining the impact of surgical coaching on trainee physiologic response and basic skill acquisition.

Authors:  Matthew D Timberlake; Dimitrios Stefanidis; Aimee K Gardner
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-03-30       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Stay Focused! The Effects of Internal and External Focus of Attention on Movement Automaticity in Patients with Stroke.

Authors:  E C Kal; J van der Kamp; H Houdijk; E Groet; C A M van Bennekom; E J A Scherder
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Increased cortico-striatal connectivity during motor practice contributes to the consolidation of motor memory in writer's cramp patients.

Authors:  C Gallea; M Balas; E Bertasi; R Valabregue; D García-Lorenzo; D Coynel; C Bonnet; D Grabli; M Pélégrini-Issac; J Doyon; H Benali; E Roze; M Vidailhet; S Lehericy
Journal:  Neuroimage Clin       Date:  2015-04-22       Impact factor: 4.881

9.  Coaching or gaming? Implications of strategy choice for home based stroke rehabilitation.

Authors:  Mónica S Cameirão; Asim Smailagic; Guangyao Miao; Dan P Siewiorek
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2016-02-27       Impact factor: 4.262

Review 10.  Is Implicit Motor Learning Preserved after Stroke? A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  E Kal; M Winters; J van der Kamp; H Houdijk; E Groet; C van Bennekom; E Scherder
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-12-16       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.