| Literature DB >> 24053582 |
Tang Liu1, Zhenyang Liu, Lin Ling, Xiangsheng Zhang.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: This is a therapeutic study to evaluate the results of the management of forearm infected nonunion using bone transport with external fixators after debridement.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2013 PMID: 24053582 PMCID: PMC3849257 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2474-14-273
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Musculoskelet Disord ISSN: 1471-2474 Impact factor: 2.362
Details of the patients
| 1 | 18/M | Ulna, middle | 2.1 | 35–0–40 | 50–0–40 | 55–0–60 | 65–0–80 | 2.5 | 42.1 | 43 |
| 2 | 35/F | Radius, proximal | 3.4 | 20–0–25 | 55–0–40 | 40–0–35 | 60–0–65 | 3.5 | 46.5 | 47 |
| 3 | 25/M | Ulna, distal | 1.8 | 25–0–40 | 65–0–50 | 45–0–50 | 60–0–75 | 2.0 | 39.6 | 39 |
| 4 | 56/F | Radius, proximal | 2.9 | 30–0–25 | 50–0–45 | 35–0–40 | 65–0–80 | 3.0 | 51.6 | 54 |
| 5 | 15/M | Ulna, distal | 3.5 | 60–0–55 | 60–0–55 | 55–0–40 | 80–0–85 | 3.5 | 37.9 | 31 |
| 6 | 37/M | Ulna, distal | 4.6 | 50–0–50 | 50–0–50 | 60–0–45 | 75–0–70 | 4.8 | 47.5 | 57 |
| 7 | 43/F | Both, distal | 2.4 | 10–0–15 | 45–0–30 | 25–0–30 | 50–0–45 | 2.5 | 50.5 | 42 |
| 8 | 51/F | Radius, distal | 4.2 | 25–0–30 | 55–0–40 | 40–0–55 | 60–0–75 | 4.5 | 53.2 | 53 |
| 9 | 40/M | Ulna, proximal | 4.0 | 30–0–30 | 50–0–60 | 55–0–40 | 85–0–80 | 4.0 | 38.0 | 36 |
| 10 | 24/F | Radius, middle | 3.7 | 20–0–25 | 60–0–55 | 30–0–45 | 65–0–60 | 4.0 | 45.6 | 48 |
| 11 | 27/M | Ulna, distal | 2.9 | 30–0–45 | 40–0–60 | 45–0–60 | 75–0–80 | 3.0 | 43.5 | 35 |
| 12 | 32/M | Ulna, proximal | 3.6 | 35–0–35 | 50–0–50 | 30–0–45 | 60–0–75 | 3.8 | 47.3 | 52 |
| 13 | 38/M | Radius, proximal | 2.3 | 50–0–60 | 50–0–60 | 45–0–50 | 75–0–70 | 2.5 | 39.5 | 37 |
| 14 | 45/F | Ulna, distal | 3.4 | 60–0–60 | 60–0–60 | 75–0–60 | 75–0–80 | 3.5 | 41.5 | 41 |
| 15 | 31/F | Ulna, distal | 4.1 | 30–0–25 | 50–0–40 | 20–0–35 | 85–0–75 | 4.0 | 47.5 | 53 |
| 16 | 26/M | Radius, distal | 3.8 | 25–0–30 | 35–0–50 | 40–0–25 | 60–0–50 | 4.0 | 51.2 | 36 |
| 17 | 17/F | Ulna, proximal | 2.6 | 40–0–45 | 60–0–60 | 50–0–40 | 75–0–80 | 3.0 | 43.5 | 38 |
| 18 | 36/M | Ulna, distal | 3.2 | 30–0–45 | 40–0–50 | 40–0–45 | 65–0–60 | 3.5 | 53.5 | 46 |
| 19 | 29/F | Both, distal | 2.7 | 20–0–15 | 40–0–60 | 40–0–35 | 65–0–70 | 3.0 | 45.7 | 43 |
| 20 | 21/M | Ulna, distal | 4.5 | 30–0–45 | 60–0–60 | 55–0–30 | 70–0–80 | 4.5 | 39.5 | 35 |
| 21 | 38/M | Ulna, proximal | 3.8 | 40–0–45 | 40–0–45 | 30–0–40 | 65–0–70 | 4.0 | 43.0 | 42 |
Figure 1Radiograph of a 15-year-old man (case 5) who sustained comminuted fractures of ulna and radius had an infected ulna nonunion.
Figure 2It shows dead bone in the docking site after removal of the ulna internal fixation. The ulna defect was 3.5 cm.
Figure 33 days after operation. It shows removal of the internal fixations, eradication of the necrotic bone and tissues and application of the three-segment unilateral external fxator. The wounds were packed with iodoform gauze additionally.
Figure 420 days after compression-distraction osteogenesis with the external fIxator.
Figure 54.5 months after the operation, the callus regenerated well to prepare to remove external fixator.