Literature DB >> 8156662

Segmental tibial defects. Comparing conventional and Ilizarov methodologies.

G Cierny1, K E Zorn.   

Abstract

Forty-four consecutive patients with segmental debridement defects of the tibia had limb-salvage surgery. Twenty-one patients (Group I) were managed using methods as described by Ilizarov. Twenty-three patients (Group II) underwent conventional treatment with massive cancellous grafts and tissue transfers. Total wound consolidation and infection arrest took place after the first treatment in 71% of the Ilizarov wounds and 74% of the conventionally treated wounds. The major complication rates were 33% and 60% for Groups I and II respectively. The patient population at highest risk for failure was the compromised host treated conventionally (44%). The cost for retreatment and overall success rate (95%) were the same for both groups. Ilizarov reconstructions averaged nine fewer hours in the operating theater, 23 fewer days in the hospital, five fewer months' disability (17 months versus 22 months), and a savings of nearly $30,000 per application.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8156662

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  42 in total

1.  Comparison of 39 post-traumatic tibia bone transports performed with and without the use of an intramedullary rod: the long-term outcomes.

Authors:  Emmanouil Liodakis; Mohamed Kenawey; Christian Krettek; Ulrich Wiebking; Stefan Hankemeier
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-07-22       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Management of large segmental tibial defects using locking IM nail and absorbable mesh.

Authors:  Chris Whately; Mohamed Attia Abdallah; Yahya Ahmed Alwatari
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2013-07-25

3.  Tetrafocal leg reconstruction using combined Ilizarov/TSF technique.

Authors:  Francesco Sala; Tazio Talamonti; Maria Alice Agus
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2011-03-23

4.  Giants of Orthopaedic Surgery: George C. Cierny III MD.

Authors:  Anthony Calabro
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 5.  "Ilizarov" external fixation: what the radiologist needs to know.

Authors:  Jonathan Tresley; Scott J Schoenleber; Adam D Singer; Paul Clifford
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2014-09-17       Impact factor: 2.199

6.  Ilizarov fixator combined with an intramedullary nail for tibial nonunions with bone loss: is it effective?

Authors:  Deniz Gulabi; Mehmet Erdem; Gultekin Sıtkı Cecen; Cem Coskun Avci; Necdet Saglam; Fevzi Saglam
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Ilizarov methodology for infected non union of the Tibia: Classic circular transfixion wire assembly vs. hybrid assembly.

Authors:  Ranjit Kr Baruah
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 1.251

8.  Speeded gradual lengthening and secondary angled blade plate stabilisation for proximal tibial shaft non-union with shortening.

Authors:  Chi-Chuan Wu; Zhon-Liau Lee; C-C Wu; Z-L Lee
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2007-05-11       Impact factor: 3.075

9.  Management of open infected comminuted tibial fractures using Ilizarov concept.

Authors:  Ashraf Atef; Ahmad El-Tantawy
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2013-03-09

10.  Appraisal of the role of external skeletal fixation in the management of sequelae of open tibial fractures.

Authors:  Mahmound A El-Rosasy
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 1.251

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.