| Literature DB >> 19450257 |
Fernando Baldy dos Reis1, Flávio Faloppa, Hélio J Alvachian Fernandes, Walter Manna Albertoni, Philip F Stahel.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The treatment of forearm fracture-nonunions continues to represent a therapeutic challenge, and reported outcomes are moderate at best. Limiting aspects of this particular anatomic location include the relation between restoration of shaft length with the anatomy and long-term functional outcome of adjacent joints, as well as the risk of elbow and wrist stiffness related to prolonged immobilization. The present study was designed to assess the outcome of autologous bone grafting with compression plating and early functional rehabilitation in patients with forearm fracture non-unions.Entities:
Year: 2009 PMID: 19450257 PMCID: PMC2694823 DOI: 10.1186/1750-1164-3-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ann Surg Innov Res ISSN: 1750-1164
Figure 1Preoperative planning scheme for nonunion resection, placement of corticocancellous iliac crest bone graft, and compression plating.
Figure 2Clinical case example of a patient with a fracture-nonunion of the ulna shaft secondary to an unstable treatment modality using a small fragment tubular plate, lacking adequate stability with interfragmentary compression (A). Revision surgery was performed by corticocancellous bone grafting and compression plating using a more rigid construct with a dynamic compression plate (B). Panel C shows the fully healed radius fracture and ulnar fracture-nonunion after hardware removal.
Clinical and radiological residual deformities in 13 patients following revision surgery for forearm fracture-nonunions
| Residual deformity | Number of patients (total n = 13) |
| Positive ulnar variant: 1 mm | 4 |
| Positive ulnar variant: 2 mm | 1 |
| Negative ulnar variant: 1 mm | 2 |
| Ulnar head prominence | 2 |
| Ulnar head absence | 1 |
| Loss of radial bow | 3 |
Functional outcome in 30 patients with radiologically healed forearm fracture nonunions, assessed 6 months after revision surgery
| ROM* wrist | Number of patients |
| Normal (identical to contralateral side) | 26 |
| Flexion/extension 90°/0°/60° | 3 |
| Limited ulnar shift | 1 |
| ROM* elbow | Number of patients |
| Normal (identical to contralateral side) | 27 |
| Extension/flexion 0°/20°/120° | 1 |
| Extension/flexion 0°/30°/120° | 2 |
| Forearm rotation | Number of patients |
| Normal (identical to contralateral side) | 17 |
| Pro-/supination 90°/0°/60° | 5 |
| Pro-/supination 90°/0°/45° | 3 |
| Pro-/supination 80°/0°/70° | 1 |
| Pro-/supination 60°/0°/45° | 1 |
| Pro-/supination 45°/0°/30° | 3 |
*ROM, range of motion.