Daniel Li1, Matthew P Longnecker, David B Dunson. 1. From the aDepartment of Statistical Science, Duke University, Durham, NC; and bEpidemiology Branch, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, NIH/DHHS, Research Triangle Park, NC.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Some environmental chemical exposures are lipophilic and need to be adjusted by serum lipid levels before data analyses. There are currently various strategies that attempt to account for this problem, but all have their drawbacks. To address such concerns, we propose a new method that uses Box-Cox transformations and a simple Bayesian hierarchical model to adjust for lipophilic chemical exposures. METHODS: We compared our Box-Cox method to existing methods. We ran simulation studies in which increasing levels of lipid-adjusted chemical exposure did and did not increase the odds of having a disease, and we looked at both single-exposure and multiple-exposure cases. We also analyzed an epidemiology dataset that examined the effects of various chemical exposure on the risk of birth defects. RESULTS: Compared with existing methods, our Box-Cox method produced unbiased estimates, good coverage, similar power, and lower type I error rates. This was the case in both single- and multiple-exposure simulation studies. Results from analysis of the birth-defect data differed from results using existing methods. CONCLUSION: Our Box-Cox method is a novel and intuitive way to account for the lipophilic nature of certain chemical exposures. It addresses some of the problems with existing methods, is easily extendable to multiple exposures, and can be used in any analysis that involves concomitant variables.
BACKGROUND: Some environmental chemical exposures are lipophilic and need to be adjusted by serum lipid levels before data analyses. There are currently various strategies that attempt to account for this problem, but all have their drawbacks. To address such concerns, we propose a new method that uses Box-Cox transformations and a simple Bayesian hierarchical model to adjust for lipophilic chemical exposures. METHODS: We compared our Box-Cox method to existing methods. We ran simulation studies in which increasing levels of lipid-adjusted chemical exposure did and did not increase the odds of having a disease, and we looked at both single-exposure and multiple-exposure cases. We also analyzed an epidemiology dataset that examined the effects of various chemical exposure on the risk of birth defects. RESULTS: Compared with existing methods, our Box-Cox method produced unbiased estimates, good coverage, similar power, and lower type I error rates. This was the case in both single- and multiple-exposure simulation studies. Results from analysis of the birth-defect data differed from results using existing methods. CONCLUSION: Our Box-Cox method is a novel and intuitive way to account for the lipophilic nature of certain chemical exposures. It addresses some of the problems with existing methods, is easily extendable to multiple exposures, and can be used in any analysis that involves concomitant variables.
Authors: D J Hunter; S E Hankinson; F Laden; G A Colditz; J E Manson; W C Willett; F E Speizer; M S Wolff Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1997-10-30 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: D L Phillips; J L Pirkle; V W Burse; J T Bernert; L O Henderson; L L Needham Journal: Arch Environ Contam Toxicol Date: 1989 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 2.804
Authors: Brian W Whitcomb; Enrique F Schisterman; Germaine M Buck; John M Weiner; Hebe Greizerstein; Paul J Kostyniak Journal: Environ Toxicol Pharmacol Date: 2005-02 Impact factor: 4.860
Authors: S D Stellman; M V Djordjevic; J E Muscat; L Gong; D Bernstein; M L Citron; A White; M Kemeny; E Busch; A N Nafziger Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 1998-06 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Adila Prasodjo; Christine M Pfeiffer; Zia Fazili; Yingying Xu; Stacey Liddy; Kimberly Yolton; David A Savitz; Bruce P Lanphear; Joseph M Braun Journal: Ann Epidemiol Date: 2014-04-24 Impact factor: 3.797
Authors: Thuy Lam; Paige L Williams; Mary M Lee; Susan A Korrick; Linda S Birnbaum; Jane S Burns; Oleg Sergeyev; Boris Revich; Larisa M Altshul; Donald G Patterson; Wayman E Turner; Russ Hauser Journal: Environ Int Date: 2014-08-10 Impact factor: 9.621
Authors: Thuy Lam; Paige L Williams; Mary M Lee; Susan A Korrick; Linda S Birnbaum; Jane S Burns; Oleg Sergeyev; Boris Revich; Larisa M Altshul; Donald G Patterson; Russ Hauser Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2015-05-22 Impact factor: 9.031