James Harrop1, Darlene A Lobel, Bernard Bendok, Ashwini Sharan, Ali R Rezai. 1. *Department of Neurosurgery, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; ‡Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota; §Department of Neurosurgery, Northwestern University Hospital, Chicago, Illinois; ¶Department of Neurosurgery, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The science of medicine has undergone rapid advancement and expansion as a result of significant technological innovations, and this has affected the training of neurosurgical residents. OBJECTIVE: To develop a simulation-based neurosurgical educational curriculum to improve resident education. METHODS: The Congress of Neurological Surgeons established a Simulation Committee to explore the use of this technology in maximizing neurosurgical education. Simulators were incorporated into an educational curriculum with both a didactic and a technical component. The simulators and didactic portions were validated with objective pretests and posttests. RESULTS: The Simulator Committee has continued to expand the use of simulators in neurosurgical education and has organized several practical courses. The simulator use continues to expand into vasculature, spinal, and cranial modules. Each module has independently shown improved training scores in both didactic and technical skills. CONCLUSION: The Congress of Neurological Surgeons has successfully incorporated simulation into an educational curriculum with both didactic and technical components. This appears to be a powerful educational tool, and its uses are being further expanded.
BACKGROUND: The science of medicine has undergone rapid advancement and expansion as a result of significant technological innovations, and this has affected the training of neurosurgical residents. OBJECTIVE: To develop a simulation-based neurosurgical educational curriculum to improve resident education. METHODS: The Congress of Neurological Surgeons established a Simulation Committee to explore the use of this technology in maximizing neurosurgical education. Simulators were incorporated into an educational curriculum with both a didactic and a technical component. The simulators and didactic portions were validated with objective pretests and posttests. RESULTS: The Simulator Committee has continued to expand the use of simulators in neurosurgical education and has organized several practical courses. The simulator use continues to expand into vasculature, spinal, and cranial modules. Each module has independently shown improved training scores in both didactic and technical skills. CONCLUSION: The Congress of Neurological Surgeons has successfully incorporated simulation into an educational curriculum with both didactic and technical components. This appears to be a powerful educational tool, and its uses are being further expanded.
Authors: Roberta Rehder; Muhammad Abd-El-Barr; Kristopher Hooten; Peter Weinstock; Joseph R Madsen; Alan R Cohen Journal: Childs Nerv Syst Date: 2015-10-05 Impact factor: 1.475
Authors: Andrew R Pines; Mohammed S Alghoul; Youssef J Hamade; Mithun G Sattur; Rami James N Aoun; Tariq K Halasa; Chandan Krishna; Samer G Zammar; Najib E El Tecle; Tarek Y El Ahmadieh; Salah G Aoun; Richard W Byrne; James S Harrop; Brian T Ragel; Daniel K Resnick; Russell R Lonser; Nathan R Selden; Bernard R Bendok Journal: Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown) Date: 2017-02-01 Impact factor: 2.703
Authors: J Scott Pannell; David R Santiago-Dieppa; Arvin R Wali; Brian R Hirshman; Jeffrey A Steinberg; Vincent J Cheung; David Oveisi; Jon Hallstrom; Alexander A Khalessi Journal: Cureus Date: 2016-08-29
Authors: Kwadwo Sarpong; Tarig Fadalla; Deen L Garba; Mazin Suliman; Myron Rolle; Adam Ammar; Haytham Hussen; Kee B Park Journal: Brain Spine Date: 2022-06-09