Literature DB >> 28964079

Measuring vocal motor skill with a virtual voice-controlled slingshot.

Jarrad H Van Stan1, Se-Woong Park2, Matthew Jarvis3, Daryush D Mehta1, Robert E Hillman1, Dagmar Sternad4.   

Abstract

Successful voice training (e.g., singing lessons) and vocal rehabilitation (e.g., therapy for a voice disorder) involve learning complex, vocal behaviors. However, there are no metrics describing how humans learn new vocal skills or predicting how long the improved behavior will persist post-therapy. To develop measures capable of describing and predicting vocal motor learning, a theory-based paradigm from limb motor control inspired the development of a virtual task where subjects throw projectiles at a target via modifications in vocal pitch and loudness. Ten subjects with healthy voices practiced this complex vocal task for five days. The many-to-one mapping between the execution variables pitch and loudness and resulting target error was evaluated using an analysis that quantified distributional properties of variability: Tolerance, noise, covariation costs (TNC costs). Lag-1 autocorrelation (AC1) and detrended-fluctuation-analysis scaling index (SCI) analyzed temporal aspects of variability. Vocal data replicated limb-based findings: TNC costs were positively correlated with error; AC1 and SCI were modulated in relation to the task's solution manifold. The data suggests that vocal and limb motor learning are similar in how the learner navigates the solution space. Future work calls for investigating the game's potential to improve voice disorder diagnosis and treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28964079      PMCID: PMC5648563          DOI: 10.1121/1.5000233

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  82 in total

1.  Aerodynamic and acoustic voice measurements of patients with vocal nodules: variation in baseline and changes across voice therapy.

Authors:  Eva B Holmberg; Patricia Doyle; Joseph S Perkell; Britta Hammarberg; Robert E Hillman
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 2.009

2.  Neural mechanisms underlying auditory feedback control of speech.

Authors:  Jason A Tourville; Kevin J Reilly; Frank H Guenther
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2007-10-11       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Modeling the effects of a posterior glottal opening on vocal fold dynamics with implications for vocal hyperfunction.

Authors:  Matías Zañartu; Gabriel E Galindo; Byron D Erath; Sean D Peterson; George R Wodicka; Robert E Hillman
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Validation of an instrument to measure voice-related quality of life (V-RQOL).

Authors:  N D Hogikyan; G Sethuraman
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 2.009

5.  Discrimination of fundamental frequency contours in synthetic speech: implications for models of pitch perception.

Authors:  D H Klatt
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1973-01       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Preliminary study of two methods of treatment for laryngeal nodules.

Authors:  K Verdolini-Marston; M K Burke; A Lessac; L Glaze; E Caldwell
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 2.009

7.  Efficacy of vocal function exercises as a method of improving voice production.

Authors:  J C Stemple; L Lee; B D'Amico; B Pickup
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 2.009

8.  The effects of self-controlled feedback on learning of a "relaxed phonation task".

Authors:  Estella P-M Ma; Gigi K-Y Yiu; Edwin M-L Yiu
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2013-09-24       Impact factor: 2.009

9.  Relationships between vocal function measures derived from an acoustic microphone and a subglottal neck-surface accelerometer.

Authors:  Daryush D Mehta; Jarrad H Van Stan; Robert E Hillman
Journal:  IEEE/ACM Trans Audio Speech Lang Process       Date:  2016-01-11

10.  Integration of Motor Learning Principles Into Real-Time Ambulatory Voice Biofeedback and Example Implementation Via a Clinical Case Study With Vocal Fold Nodules.

Authors:  Jarrad H Van Stan; Daryush D Mehta; Robert J Petit; Dagmar Sternad; Jason Muise; James A Burns; Robert E Hillman
Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 2.408

View more
  2 in total

1.  Back to reality: differences in learning strategy in a simplified virtual and a real throwing task.

Authors:  Zhaoran Zhang; Dagmar Sternad
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2020-11-04       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Quantitative Assessment of Learning and Retention in Virtual Vocal Function Exercises.

Authors:  Jarrad H Van Stan; Se-Woong Park; Matthew Jarvis; Joseph Stemple; Robert E Hillman; Dagmar Sternad
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2020-12-07       Impact factor: 2.297

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.