IMPORTANCE: Previous studies have indicated that the psychopathological dimensions of borderline personality disorder (BPD) are influenced by a unitary liability factor. However, to our knowledge, the underlying etiological nature of the individual criteria for BPD as defined by the DSM-IV has not been explored. OBJECTIVE: To determine the structure of genetic and environmental risk factors for the symptoms of BPD. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Multivariate twin study with BPD criteria assessed by personal interview within a general community setting. Participants included 2794 young adults from the Norwegian Institute of Public Health Twin Panel. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The 9 criteria for BPD assessed by the Structured Interview for DSM-IV Personality. RESULTS: A common pathway model dominated by 1 highly heritable (55%) general BPD factor that strongly influenced all 9 BPD criteria (standardized path coefficients, 0.53-0.79) fit the data best. The model also included 2 additional common liability factors, mainly influencing criteria reflecting the affective and interpersonal dimensions. Both of these were mostly influenced by environmental liability factors (heritability, 29.3% and 2.2%). With 1 exception (criterion 2, unstable and intense relationships), the specific criteria were strongly influenced by environmental factors. Five of the 9 criterion-specific genetic effects were either 0 or negligible. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: These results indicate that most of the genetic effects on the individual BPD criteria derive from 1 highly heritable general BPD factor, whereas the environmental influences were mostly criterion specific.
IMPORTANCE: Previous studies have indicated that the psychopathological dimensions of borderline personality disorder (BPD) are influenced by a unitary liability factor. However, to our knowledge, the underlying etiological nature of the individual criteria for BPD as defined by the DSM-IV has not been explored. OBJECTIVE: To determine the structure of genetic and environmental risk factors for the symptoms of BPD. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Multivariate twin study with BPD criteria assessed by personal interview within a general community setting. Participants included 2794 young adults from the Norwegian Institute of Public Health Twin Panel. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The 9 criteria for BPD assessed by the Structured Interview for DSM-IV Personality. RESULTS: A common pathway model dominated by 1 highly heritable (55%) general BPD factor that strongly influenced all 9 BPD criteria (standardized path coefficients, 0.53-0.79) fit the data best. The model also included 2 additional common liability factors, mainly influencing criteria reflecting the affective and interpersonal dimensions. Both of these were mostly influenced by environmental liability factors (heritability, 29.3% and 2.2%). With 1 exception (criterion 2, unstable and intense relationships), the specific criteria were strongly influenced by environmental factors. Five of the 9 criterion-specific genetic effects were either 0 or negligible. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: These results indicate that most of the genetic effects on the individual BPD criteria derive from 1 highly heritable general BPD factor, whereas the environmental influences were mostly criterion specific.
Authors: Andrew E Skodol; John G Gunderson; Bruce Pfohl; Thomas A Widiger; W John Livesley; Larry J Siever Journal: Biol Psychiatry Date: 2002-06-15 Impact factor: 13.382
Authors: Mary C Zanarini; Lynne Yong; Frances R Frankenburg; John Hennen; D Bradford Reich; Margaret F Marino; A Anna Vujanovic Journal: J Nerv Ment Dis Date: 2002-06 Impact factor: 2.254
Authors: Charles A Sanislow; Leslie C Morey; Carlos M Grilo; John G Gunderson; M Tracie Shea; Andrew E Skodol; Robert L Stout; Mary C Zanarini; Thomas H McGlashan Journal: Acta Psychiatr Scand Date: 2002-01 Impact factor: 6.392
Authors: Shirley Yen; M Tracie Shea; Cynthia L Battle; Dawn M Johnson; Caron Zlotnick; Regina Dolan-Sewell; Andrew E Skodol; Carlos M Grilo; John G Gunderson; Charles A Sanislow; Mary C Zanarini; Donna S Bender; Jennifer Bame Rettew; Thomas H McGlashan Journal: J Nerv Ment Dis Date: 2002-08 Impact factor: 2.254
Authors: Andrew E Skodol; Larry J Siever; W John Livesley; John G Gunderson; Bruce Pfohl; Thomas A Widiger Journal: Biol Psychiatry Date: 2002-06-15 Impact factor: 13.382
Authors: K S Kendler; S H Aggen; M C Neale; G P Knudsen; R F Krueger; K Tambs; N Czajkowski; E Ystrom; R E Ørstavik; T Reichborn-Kjennerud Journal: Psychol Med Date: 2014-11-14 Impact factor: 7.723
Authors: Peter Fonagy; Mario Speranza; Patrick Luyten; Michael Kaess; Christel Hessels; Martin Bohus Journal: Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry Date: 2015-08-14 Impact factor: 4.785
Authors: Tom Rosenström; Nikolai Olavi Czajkowski; Eivind Ystrom; Robert F Krueger; Steven H Aggen; Nathan A Gillespie; Espen Eilertsen; Ted Reichborn-Kjennerud; Fartein Ask Torvik Journal: Behav Genet Date: 2018-12-07 Impact factor: 2.805
Authors: Tom Rosenström; Fartein Ask Torvik; Eivind Ystrom; Nikolai Olavi Czajkowski; Nathan A Gillespie; Steven H Aggen; Robert F Krueger; Kenneth S Kendler; Ted Reichborn-Kjennerud Journal: Addiction Date: 2017-08-23 Impact factor: 6.526
Authors: Tom Rosenström; Eivind Ystrom; Fartein Ask Torvik; Nikolai Olavi Czajkowski; Nathan A Gillespie; Steven H Aggen; Robert F Krueger; Kenneth S Kendler; Ted Reichborn-Kjennerud Journal: Behav Genet Date: 2017-01-21 Impact factor: 2.805
Authors: M C Zanarini; F R Frankenburg; D B Reich; M M Wedig; L C Conkey; G M Fitzmaurice Journal: Acta Psychiatr Scand Date: 2014-03-04 Impact factor: 6.392
Authors: Erica K MacGregor; Michael F Grunebaum; Hanga C Galfalvy; Nadine Melhem; Ainsley K Burke; David A Brent; Maria A Oquendo; J John Mann Journal: J Clin Psychiatry Date: 2014-08 Impact factor: 4.384
Authors: T Reichborn-Kjennerud; N Czajkowski; E Ystrøm; R Ørstavik; S H Aggen; K Tambs; S Torgersen; M C Neale; E Røysamb; R F Krueger; G P Knudsen; K S Kendler Journal: Psychol Med Date: 2015-06-08 Impact factor: 7.723
Authors: A Welander-Vatn; E Ystrom; K Tambs; M C Neale; K S Kendler; T Reichborn-Kjennerud; G P Knudsen Journal: J Affect Disord Date: 2015-10-24 Impact factor: 4.839