BACKGROUND: Antisocial personality disorder (ASPD) and borderline personality disorder (BPD) share genetic and environmental risk factors. Little is known about the temporal stability of these etiological factors in adulthood. METHOD: DSM-IV criteria for ASPD and BPD were assessed using structured interviews in 2282 Norwegian twins in early adulthood and again approximately 10 years later. Longitudinal biometric models were used to analyze the number of endorsed criteria. RESULTS: The mean criterion count for ASPD and BPD decreased 40% and 28%, respectively, from early to middle adulthood. Rank-order stability was 0.58 for ASPD and 0.45 for BPD. The best-fitting longitudinal twin model included only genetic and individual-specific environmental factors. Genetic effects, both those shared by ASPD and BPD, and those specific to each disorder remained completely stable. The unique environmental effects, however, changed substantially, with a correlation across time of 0.19 for the shared effects, and 0.39 and 0.15, respectively, for those specific to ASPD and BPD. Genetic effects accounted for 71% and 72% of the stability over time for ASPD and BPD, respectively. The genetic and environmental correlations between ASPD and BPD were 0.73, and 0.43, respectively, at both time points. CONCLUSION: ASPD and BPD traits were moderately stable from early to middle adulthood, mostly due to genetic risk factors which did not change over the 10-year assessment period. Environmental risk factors were mostly transient, and appear to be the main source of phenotypic change. Genetic liability factors were, to a large extent, shared by ASPD and BPD.
BACKGROUND:Antisocial personality disorder (ASPD) and borderline personality disorder (BPD) share genetic and environmental risk factors. Little is known about the temporal stability of these etiological factors in adulthood. METHOD: DSM-IV criteria for ASPD and BPD were assessed using structured interviews in 2282 Norwegian twins in early adulthood and again approximately 10 years later. Longitudinal biometric models were used to analyze the number of endorsed criteria. RESULTS: The mean criterion count for ASPD and BPD decreased 40% and 28%, respectively, from early to middle adulthood. Rank-order stability was 0.58 for ASPD and 0.45 for BPD. The best-fitting longitudinal twin model included only genetic and individual-specific environmental factors. Genetic effects, both those shared by ASPD and BPD, and those specific to each disorder remained completely stable. The unique environmental effects, however, changed substantially, with a correlation across time of 0.19 for the shared effects, and 0.39 and 0.15, respectively, for those specific to ASPD and BPD. Genetic effects accounted for 71% and 72% of the stability over time for ASPD and BPD, respectively. The genetic and environmental correlations between ASPD and BPD were 0.73, and 0.43, respectively, at both time points. CONCLUSION: ASPD and BPD traits were moderately stable from early to middle adulthood, mostly due to genetic risk factors which did not change over the 10-year assessment period. Environmental risk factors were mostly transient, and appear to be the main source of phenotypic change. Genetic liability factors were, to a large extent, shared by ASPD and BPD.
Authors: Espen Røysamb; Kenneth S Kendler; Kristian Tambs; Ragnhild E Orstavik; Michael C Neale; Steven H Aggen; Svenn Torgersen; Ted Reichborn-Kjennerud Journal: J Abnorm Psychol Date: 2011-02
Authors: Marina A Bornovalova; Brooke M Huibregtse; Brian M Hicks; Margaret Keyes; Matt McGue; William Iacono Journal: J Abnorm Psychol Date: 2012-06-11
Authors: Kenneth S Kendler; Steven H Aggen; Gun Peggy Knudsen; Espen Røysamb; Michael C Neale; Ted Reichborn-Kjennerud Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 2010-10-15 Impact factor: 18.112
Authors: Marijn A Distel; Tim J Trull; Marleen M H de Moor; Jacqueline M Vink; Lot M Geels; Jenny H D A van Beek; Meike Bartels; Gonneke Willemsen; Evert Thiery; Catherine A Derom; Michael C Neale; Dorret I Boomsma Journal: J Pers Disord Date: 2012-12
Authors: Tom Rosenström; Nikolai Olavi Czajkowski; Eivind Ystrom; Robert F Krueger; Steven H Aggen; Nathan A Gillespie; Espen Eilertsen; Ted Reichborn-Kjennerud; Fartein Ask Torvik Journal: Behav Genet Date: 2018-12-07 Impact factor: 2.805
Authors: Tom Rosenström; Fartein Ask Torvik; Eivind Ystrom; Nikolai Olavi Czajkowski; Nathan A Gillespie; Steven H Aggen; Robert F Krueger; Kenneth S Kendler; Ted Reichborn-Kjennerud Journal: Addiction Date: 2017-08-23 Impact factor: 6.526
Authors: Nathan A Gillespie; Steven H Aggen; Amanda E Gentry; Michael C Neale; Gun P Knudsen; Robert F Krueger; Susan C South; Nikolai Czajkowski; Ragnar Nesvåg; Eivind Ystrom; Tom H Rosenström; Fartein A Torvik; Ted Reichborn-Kjennerud; Kenneth S Kendler Journal: Twin Res Hum Genet Date: 2018-02 Impact factor: 1.587
Authors: E C Long; S H Aggen; M C Neale; G P Knudsen; R F Krueger; S C South; N Czajkowski; R Nesvåg; E Ystrom; F A Torvik; K S Kendler; N A Gillespie; T Reichborn-Kjennerud Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2017-03-07 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Tom Rosenström; Eivind Ystrom; Fartein Ask Torvik; Nikolai Olavi Czajkowski; Nathan A Gillespie; Steven H Aggen; Robert F Krueger; Kenneth S Kendler; Ted Reichborn-Kjennerud Journal: Behav Genet Date: 2017-01-21 Impact factor: 2.805
Authors: Nathan A Gillespie; Steven H Aggen; Michael C Neale; Gun Peggy Knudsen; Robert F Krueger; Susan C South; Nikolai Czajkowski; Ragnar Nesvåg; Eivind Ystrom; Kenneth S Kendler; Ted Reichborn-Kjennerud Journal: Addiction Date: 2018-04-13 Impact factor: 6.526
Authors: Kenneth S Kendler; Steven H Aggen; Nathan Gillespie; Robert F Krueger; Nikolai Czajkowski; Eivind Ystrom; T Reichborn-Kjennerud Journal: Psychol Med Date: 2019-02-06 Impact factor: 7.723