Literature DB >> 24047641

The impact of prenatal employment on breastfeeding intentions and breastfeeding status at 1 week postpartum.

Laura Attanasio1, Katy B Kozhimannil, Patricia McGovern, Dwenda Gjerdingen, Pamela Jo Johnson.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Postpartum employment is associated with non-initiation and early cessation of breastfeeding, but less is known about the relationship between prenatal employment and breastfeeding intentions and behaviors.
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to estimate the relationship between prenatal employment status, a strong predictor of postpartum return to work, and breastfeeding intentions and behaviors.
METHODS: Using data from the Listening to Mothers II national survey (N = 1573), we used propensity score matching methods to account for non-random selection into employment patterns and to measure the impact of prenatal employment status on breastfeeding intentions and behaviors. We also examined whether hospital practices consistent with the Baby-Friendly Hospital Initiative (BFHI), assessed based on maternal perception, were differentially associated with breastfeeding by employment status.
RESULTS: Women who were employed (vs unemployed) during pregnancy were older, were more educated, were less likely to have had a previous cesarean delivery, and had fewer children. After matching, these differences were eliminated. Although breastfeeding intention did not differ by employment, full-time employment (vs no employment) during pregnancy was associated with decreased odds of exclusive breastfeeding 1 week postpartum (adjusted odds ratio = 0.48; 95% confidence interval, 0.25-0.92; P = .028). Higher BFHI scores were associated with higher odds of breastfeeding at 1 week but did not differentially impact women by employment status.
CONCLUSION: Women employed full-time during pregnancy were less likely to fulfill their intention to exclusively breastfeed, compared to women who were not employed during pregnancy. Clinicians should be aware that employment circumstances may impact women's breastfeeding decisions; this may help guide discussions during clinical encounters.

Entities:  

Keywords:  breastfeeding; breastfeeding behaviors; exclusive breastfeeding; prenatal employment; propensity score matching

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24047641      PMCID: PMC3835540          DOI: 10.1177/0890334413504149

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hum Lact        ISSN: 0890-3344            Impact factor:   2.219


  22 in total

1.  Baby-Friendly hospital practices and meeting exclusive breastfeeding intention.

Authors:  Cria G Perrine; Kelley S Scanlon; Ruowei Li; Erika Odom; Laurence M Grummer-Strawn
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2012-06-04       Impact factor: 7.124

2.  The differential effects of full-time and part-time work status on breastfeeding.

Authors:  Bidisha Mandal; Brian Eric Roe; Sara Beck Fein
Journal:  Health Policy       Date:  2010-04-18       Impact factor: 2.980

3.  Why do women stop breastfeeding? Findings from the Pregnancy Risk Assessment and Monitoring System.

Authors:  Indu B Ahluwalia; Brian Morrow; Jason Hsia
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 7.124

4.  Nativity/immigrant status, race/ethnicity, and socioeconomic determinants of breastfeeding initiation and duration in the United States, 2003.

Authors:  Gopal K Singh; Michael D Kogan; Deborah L Dee
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 7.124

5.  Propensity score methods for bias reduction in the comparison of a treatment to a non-randomized control group.

Authors:  R B D'Agostino
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1998-10-15       Impact factor: 2.373

Review 6.  Breastfeeding and the use of human milk.

Authors: 
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2012-02-27       Impact factor: 7.124

7.  Breastfeeding rates in US Baby-Friendly hospitals: results of a national survey.

Authors:  Anne Merewood; Supriya D Mehta; Laura Beth Chamberlain; Barbara L Philipp; Howard Bauchner
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 7.124

8.  Breast-feeding initiation in low-income women: Role of attitudes, support, and perceived control.

Authors:  Amal J Khoury; S Wakerul Moazzem; Chad M Jarjoura; Cathy Carothers; Agnes Hinton
Journal:  Womens Health Issues       Date:  2005 Mar-Apr

9.  Hospital practices and women's likelihood of fulfilling their intention to exclusively breastfeed.

Authors:  Eugene Declercq; Miriam H Labbok; Carol Sakala; MaryAnn O'Hara
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2009-03-19       Impact factor: 9.308

10.  Listening to Mothers II: Report of the Second National U.S. Survey of Women's Childbearing Experiences: Conducted January-February 2006 for Childbirth Connection by Harris Interactive(R) in partnership with Lamaze International.

Authors:  Eugene R Declercq; Carol Sakala; Maureen P Corry; Sandra Applebaum
Journal:  J Perinat Educ       Date:  2007
View more
  9 in total

1.  Access to Workplace Accommodations to Support Breastfeeding after Passage of the Affordable Care Act.

Authors:  Katy B Kozhimannil; Judy Jou; Dwenda K Gjerdingen; Patricia M McGovern
Journal:  Womens Health Issues       Date:  2015-10-13

2.  In the United States, a Mother's Plans for Infant Feeding Are Associated with Her Plans for Employment.

Authors:  Kelsey R Mirkovic; Cria G Perrine; Kelley S Scanlon; Laurence M Grummer-Strawn
Journal:  J Hum Lact       Date:  2014-05-27       Impact factor: 2.219

3.  Maternal breastfeeding and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in children: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ping-Tao Tseng; Cheng-Fang Yen; Yen-Wen Chen; Brendon Stubbs; Andre F Carvalho; Paul Whiteley; Che-Sheng Chu; Dian-Jeng Li; Tien-Yu Chen; Wei-Cheng Yang; Chia-Hung Tang; Hsin-Yi Liang; Wei-Chieh Yang; Ching-Kuan Wu; Pao-Yen Lin
Journal:  Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry       Date:  2018-06-15       Impact factor: 4.785

4.  Women's Experiences with Neuraxial Labor Analgesia in the Listening to Mothers II Survey: A Content Analysis of Open-Ended Responses.

Authors:  Laura Attanasio; Katy B Kozhimannil; Judy Jou; Marianne E McPherson; William Camann
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 6.627

5.  Medically complex pregnancies and early breastfeeding behaviors: a retrospective analysis.

Authors:  Katy B Kozhimannil; Judy Jou; Laura B Attanasio; Lauren K Joarnt; Patricia McGovern
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-08-13       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Infant feeding knowledge, perceptions and practices among women with and without HIV in Johannesburg, South Africa: a survey in healthcare facilities.

Authors:  Coceka N Mnyani; Carol L Tait; Jean Armstrong; Duane Blaauw; Matthew F Chersich; Eckhart J Buchmann; Remco P H Peters; James A McIntyre
Journal:  Int Breastfeed J       Date:  2017-04-08       Impact factor: 3.461

7.  Work, race and breastfeeding outcomes for mothers in the United States.

Authors:  Margaret D Whitley; Annie Ro; Anton Palma
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-05-05       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Identification of Socio-demographic and Psychological Factors Affecting Women's Propensity to Breastfeed: An Italian Cohort.

Authors:  Valentina E Di Mattei; Letizia Carnelli; Martina Bernardi; Chiara Jongerius; Chiara Brombin; Federica Cugnata; Anna Ogliari; Stefania Rinaldi; Massimo Candiani; Lucio Sarno
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-11-29

9.  Combining breastfeeding and work: findings from the Epifane population-based birth cohort.

Authors:  Katia Castetbon; Julie Boudet-Berquier; Benoit Salanave
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2020-02-17       Impact factor: 3.007

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.