Literature DB >> 16140702

Breastfeeding rates in US Baby-Friendly hospitals: results of a national survey.

Anne Merewood1, Supriya D Mehta, Laura Beth Chamberlain, Barbara L Philipp, Howard Bauchner.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this study were to analyze all available breastfeeding data from US Baby-Friendly hospitals in 2001 to determine whether breastfeeding rates at Baby-Friendly designated hospitals differed from average US national, regional, and state rates in the same year and to determine prime barriers to implementation of the Baby-Friendly Hospital Initiative.
METHODS: In 2001, 32 US hospitals had Baby-Friendly designation. Using a cross-sectional design with focused interviews, this study surveyed all 29 hospitals that retained that designation in 2003. Demographic data, breastfeeding rates, and information on barriers to becoming Baby-Friendly were also collected. Simple linear regression was used to assess factors associated with breastfeeding initiation.
RESULTS: Twenty-eight of 29 hospitals provided breastfeeding initiation rates: 2 from birth certificate data and 26 from the medical record. Sixteen provided in-hospital, exclusive breastfeeding rates. The mean breastfeeding initiation rate for the 28 Baby-Friendly hospitals in 2001 was 83.8%, compared with a US breastfeeding initiation rate of 69.5% in 2001. The mean rate of exclusive breastfeeding during the hospital stay (16 of 29 hospitals) was 78.4%, compared with a national mean of 46.3%. In simple linear regression analysis, breastfeeding rates were not associated with number of births per institution or with the proportion of black or low-income patients. Of the Ten Steps to Successful Breastfeeding the 3 described as most difficult to meet were Steps 6, 2, and 7. The reason cited for the problem with meeting Step 6 was the requirement that the hospital pay for infant formula.
CONCLUSION: Baby-Friendly designated hospitals in the United States have elevated rates of breastfeeding initiation and exclusivity. Elevated rates persist regardless of demographic factors that are traditionally linked with low breastfeeding rates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16140702     DOI: 10.1542/peds.2004-1636

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatrics        ISSN: 0031-4005            Impact factor:   7.124


  37 in total

1.  Association of Maternity Care Practices and Policies with In-Hospital Exclusive Breastfeeding in the United States.

Authors:  Chloe M Barrera; Jennifer L Beauregard; Jennifer M Nelson; Cria G Perrine
Journal:  Breastfeed Med       Date:  2019-03-14       Impact factor: 1.817

Review 2.  Baby-Friendly: snappy slogan or standard of care?

Authors:  B L Philipp; A Radford
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 5.747

3.  A practical intervention to increase breastfeeding initiation among Cambodian women in the US.

Authors:  Sharon Galvin; Xena Grossman; Lori Feldman-Winter; Jana Chaudhuri; Anne Merewood
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2007-08-10

4.  Improving birth outcomes requires closing the racial gap.

Authors:  Gail Christopher; Patrick Simpson
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2013-12-19       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  Social and institutional factors that affect breastfeeding duration among WIC participants in Los Angeles County, California.

Authors:  Brent A Langellier; M Pia Chaparro; Shannon E Whaley
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2012-12

6.  A comparison of exclusive breastfeeding in Belgian maternity facilities with and without Baby-friendly Hospital status.

Authors:  Emmanuelle Robert; Isabelle Michaud-Létourneau; Michèle Dramaix-Wilmet; Béatrice Swennen; Roland Devlieger
Journal:  Matern Child Nutr       Date:  2019-06-11       Impact factor: 3.092

7.  Infant Feeding Practices and Perceived Optimal Breastfeeding Interventions among Low-Income Women Delivering at a Baby-Friendly Hospital.

Authors:  Adam K Lewkowitz; Nandini Raghuraman; Julia D López; George A Macones; Alison G Cahill
Journal:  Am J Perinatol       Date:  2018-12-19       Impact factor: 1.862

8.  The impact of prenatal employment on breastfeeding intentions and breastfeeding status at 1 week postpartum.

Authors:  Laura Attanasio; Katy B Kozhimannil; Patricia McGovern; Dwenda Gjerdingen; Pamela Jo Johnson
Journal:  J Hum Lact       Date:  2013-09-18       Impact factor: 2.219

9.  Predictors of Non-Attendance to the Postpartum Follow-up Visit.

Authors:  Annemieke Wilcox; Erika E Levi; Joanne M Garrett
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2016-11

10.  Social and demographic determinants for breastfeeding in a rural, suburban and city area of South East China.

Authors:  Jianghong Liu; Zumin Shi; Diane Spatz; Rebecca Loh; Guiju Sun; Jeane Grisso
Journal:  Contemp Nurse       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 1.787

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.