Literature DB >> 24043805

Spatiotemporal dynamics in understanding hand-object interactions.

Pietro Avanzini1, Maddalena Fabbri-Destro, Cristina Campi, Annalisa Pascarella, Guido Barchiesi, Luigi Cattaneo, Giacomo Rizzolatti.   

Abstract

It is generally accepted that visual perception results from the activation of a feed-forward hierarchy of areas, leading to increasingly complex representations. Here we present evidence for a fundamental role of backward projections to the occipito-temporal region for understanding conceptual object properties. The evidence is based on two studies. In the first study, using high-density EEG, we showed that during the observation of how objects are used there is an early activation of occipital and temporal areas, subsequently reaching the pole of the temporal lobe, and a late reactivation of the visual areas. In the second study, using transcranial magnetic stimulation over the occipital lobe, we showed a clear impairment in the accuracy of recognition of how objects are used during both early activation and, most importantly, late occipital reactivation. These findings represent strong neurophysiological evidence that a top-down mechanism is fundamental for understanding conceptual object properties, and suggest that a similar mechanism might be also present for other higher-order cognitive functions.

Keywords:  conceptual knowledge; object use understanding; top-down effect

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24043805      PMCID: PMC3791766          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1314420110

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  45 in total

1.  Studies in cognition: the problems solved and created by transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  E M Robertson; H Théoret; A Pascual-Leone
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2003-10-01       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Figure-ground segregation requires two distinct periods of activity in V1: a transcranial magnetic stimulation study.

Authors:  Klaartje Heinen; Jacob Jolij; Victor A F Lamme
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2005-09-08       Impact factor: 1.837

Review 3.  Distributed hierarchical processing in the primate cerebral cortex.

Authors:  D J Felleman; D C Van Essen
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  1991 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.357

4.  Receptive fields and functional architecture of monkey striate cortex.

Authors:  D H Hubel; T N Wiesel
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1968-03       Impact factor: 5.182

5.  A neural basis for lexical retrieval.

Authors:  H Damasio; T J Grabowski; D Tranel; R D Hichwa; A R Damasio
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1996-04-11       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Visual receptive fields of neurons in inferotemporal cortex of the monkey.

Authors:  C G Gross; D B Bender; C E Rocha-Miranda
Journal:  Science       Date:  1969-12-05       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 7.  Comparative mapping of higher visual areas in monkeys and humans.

Authors:  Guy A Orban; David Van Essen; Wim Vanduffel
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 20.229

Review 8.  Visual object recognition.

Authors:  N K Logothetis; D L Sheinberg
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 12.449

9.  Conceptual object representations in human anterior temporal cortex.

Authors:  Marius V Peelen; Alfonso Caramazza
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-11-07       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Spatiotemporal analysis of multichannel EEG: CARTOOL.

Authors:  Denis Brunet; Micah M Murray; Christoph M Michel
Journal:  Comput Intell Neurosci       Date:  2011-01-05
View more
  5 in total

1.  Timing of grip and goal activation during action perception: a priming study.

Authors:  Jérémy Decroix; Solène Kalénine
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-06-16       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Neural rhythmic symphony of human walking observation: Upside-down and Uncoordinated condition on cortical theta, alpha, beta and gamma oscillations.

Authors:  David Zarka; Carlos Cevallos; Mathieu Petieau; Thomas Hoellinger; Bernard Dan; Guy Cheron
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2014-09-18

3.  Fish do not feel pain and its implications for understanding phenomenal consciousness.

Authors:  Brian Key
Journal:  Biol Philos       Date:  2014-12-16       Impact factor: 1.461

4.  Head model and electrical source imaging: a study of 38 epileptic patients.

Authors:  Gwénael Birot; Laurent Spinelli; Serge Vulliémoz; Pierre Mégevand; Denis Brunet; Margitta Seeck; Christoph M Michel
Journal:  Neuroimage Clin       Date:  2014-06-16       Impact factor: 4.881

5.  Neural dynamics of grip and goal integration during the processing of others' actions with objects: An ERP study.

Authors:  Jérémy Decroix; Clémence Roger; Solène Kalénine
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-03-19       Impact factor: 4.379

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.