Literature DB >> 29909461

Timing of grip and goal activation during action perception: a priming study.

Jérémy Decroix1, Solène Kalénine2.   

Abstract

Several models of action recognition acknowledge the involvement of distinct grip and goal representations in the processing of others' actions. Yet, their functional role and temporal organization are still debated. The present priming study aimed at evaluating the relative timing of grip and goal activation during the processing of photographs of object-directed actions. Action could be correct or incorrect owing to grip and/or goal violations. Twenty-eight (Experiment 1) and 25 (Experiment 2) healthy adults judged the correctness of target actions according to object typical use. Target pictures were primed by action pictures sharing the same grip or same goal, both the same grip and same goal or none. Primes were presented for 66 or 300 ms in Experiment 1 and for 120 or 220 ms in Experiment 2. In Experiment 1, facilitative priming effects were observed for goal and grip similarity after 300 ms primes but only for goal after 66 ms primes. In Experiment 2, facilitative priming effects were found for both goal and grip similarity from 120 ms of prime processing. In addition, results from a control condition in Experiment 2 indicated that mere object priming could partially account for goal similarity priming effects, suggesting that object identity may help the observer to make predictions about possible action goals. Findings demonstrate an early and first activation of goal representations, as compared to grip representations, in action decoding, consistent with predictive accounts of action understanding. Future studies should determine to what extent the timing of grip and goal activation is context-sensitive.

Keywords:  Action semantics; Action understanding; Goals; Grip; Priming

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29909461     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-018-5309-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  55 in total

Review 1.  Simulation during observation of human actions--theories, empirical studies, applications.

Authors:  Karen Zentgraf; Jörn Munzert; Matthias Bischoff; Roger D Newman-Norlund
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2011-01-28       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Spatiotemporal dynamics in understanding hand-object interactions.

Authors:  Pietro Avanzini; Maddalena Fabbri-Destro; Cristina Campi; Annalisa Pascarella; Guido Barchiesi; Luigi Cattaneo; Giacomo Rizzolatti
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-09-16       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Automatic imitation of biomechanically possible and impossible actions: effects of priming movements versus goals.

Authors:  Matthew R Longo; Adam Kosobud; Bennett I Bertenthal
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  What's she doing in the kitchen? Context helps when actions are hard to recognize.

Authors:  Moritz F Wurm; Ricarda I Schubotz
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2017-04

5.  More than one pathway to action understanding.

Authors:  James M Kilner
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2011-07-19       Impact factor: 20.229

6.  Action observers implicitly expect actors to act goal-coherently, even if they do not: an fMRI study.

Authors:  Mari Hrkać; Moritz F Wurm; Ricarda I Schubotz
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2013-08-24       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 7.  Effects of action observation on corticospinal excitability: Muscle specificity, direction, and timing of the mirror response.

Authors:  Katherine R Naish; Carmel Houston-Price; Andrew J Bremner; Nicholas P Holmes
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2014-10-02       Impact factor: 3.139

8.  Decoding intentions from movement kinematics.

Authors:  Andrea Cavallo; Atesh Koul; Caterina Ansuini; Francesca Capozzi; Cristina Becchio
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-11-15       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Understanding the Goals of Everyday Instrumental Actions Is Primarily Linked to Object, Not Motor-Kinematic, Information: Evidence from fMRI.

Authors:  Toby Nicholson; Matt Roser; Patric Bach
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-01-12       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  One step ahead: The perceived kinematics of others' actions are biased toward expected goals.

Authors:  Matthew Hudson; Toby Nicholson; William A Simpson; Rob Ellis; Patric Bach
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2015-11-23
View more
  5 in total

1.  Hazardous tools: the emergence of reasoning in human tool use.

Authors:  Giovanni Federico; François Osiurak; Maria A Brandimonte
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2021-01-06

2.  Can the early visual processing of others' actions be related to social power and dominance?

Authors:  Jérémy Decroix; Laurent Ott; Nicolas Morgado; Solène Kalénine
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2021-11-21

3.  On the Temporal Dynamics of Tool Use.

Authors:  François Osiurak; Giovanni Federico; Maria A Brandimonte; Emanuelle Reynaud; Mathieu Lesourd
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2020-12-07       Impact factor: 3.169

4.  Affordance matching predictively shapes the perceptual representation of others' ongoing actions.

Authors:  Katrina L McDonough; Marcello Costantini; Matthew Hudson; Eleanor Ward; Patric Bach
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2020-05-07       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Neural dynamics of grip and goal integration during the processing of others' actions with objects: An ERP study.

Authors:  Jérémy Decroix; Clémence Roger; Solène Kalénine
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-03-19       Impact factor: 4.379

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.