Literature DB >> 16110276

Figure-ground segregation requires two distinct periods of activity in V1: a transcranial magnetic stimulation study.

Klaartje Heinen1, Jacob Jolij, Victor A F Lamme.   

Abstract

Discriminating objects from their surroundings by the visual system is known as figure-ground segregation. This process entails two different subprocesses: boundary detection and subsequent surface segregation or 'filling in'. In this study, we used transcranial magnetic stimulation to test the hypothesis that temporally distinct processes in V1 and related early visual areas such as V2 or V3 are causally related to the process of figure-ground segregation. Our results indicate that correct discrimination between two visual stimuli, which relies on figure-ground segregation, requires two separate periods of information processing in the early visual cortex: one around 130-160 ms and the other around 250-280 ms.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16110276     DOI: 10.1097/01.wnr.0000175611.26485.c8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroreport        ISSN: 0959-4965            Impact factor:   1.837


  20 in total

1.  Atypical neural substrates of Embedded Figures Task performance in children with Autism Spectrum Disorder.

Authors:  Philip S Lee; Jennifer Foss-Feig; Joshua G Henderson; Lauren E Kenworthy; Lisa Gilotty; William D Gaillard; Chandan J Vaidya
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2007-07-24       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  Spatiotemporal dynamics in understanding hand-object interactions.

Authors:  Pietro Avanzini; Maddalena Fabbri-Destro; Cristina Campi; Annalisa Pascarella; Guido Barchiesi; Luigi Cattaneo; Giacomo Rizzolatti
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-09-16       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Recognition alters the spatial pattern of FMRI activation in early retinotopic cortex.

Authors:  P-J Hsieh; E Vul; N Kanwisher
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-01-13       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Is selective primary visual cortex stimulation achievable with TMS?

Authors:  Niina Salminen-Vaparanta; Valdas Noreika; Antti Revonsuo; Mika Koivisto; Simo Vanni
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-03-17       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  Testing the Role of Dorsal Premotor Cortex in Auditory-Motor Association Learning Using Transcranical Magnetic Stimulation (TMS).

Authors:  Carlotta Lega; Marianne A Stephan; Robert J Zatorre; Virginia Penhune
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-09-29       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  TMS disruption of V5/MT+ indicates a role for the dorsal stream in word recognition.

Authors:  Robin Laycock; David P Crewther; Paul B Fitzgerald; Sheila G Crewther
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-06-19       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Two phases of V1 activity for visual recognition of natural images.

Authors:  Joan A Camprodon; Ehud Zohary; Verena Brodbeck; Alvaro Pascual-Leone
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  Feedback of visual object information to foveal retinotopic cortex.

Authors:  Mark A Williams; Chris I Baker; Hans P Op de Beeck; Won Mok Shim; Sabin Dang; Christina Triantafyllou; Nancy Kanwisher
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2008-11-02       Impact factor: 24.884

9.  Recurrent Processing in the Formation of Shape Percepts.

Authors:  Jan Drewes; Galina Goren; Weina Zhu; James H Elder
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2016-01-06       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  The temporal dynamics of early visual cortex involvement in behavioral priming.

Authors:  Christianne Jacobs; Tom A de Graaf; Rainer Goebel; Alexander T Sack
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-11-14       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.