Literature DB >> 16287886

Women's decision-making roles regarding contralateral prophylactic mastectomy.

Larissa Nekhlyudov1, Megan Bower, Lisa J Herrinton, Andrea Altschuler, Sarah M Greene, Sharon Rolnick, Joann G Elmore, Emily L Harris, Amy Liu, Karen M Emmons, Suzanne W Fletcher, Ann M Geiger.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (CPM) is the removal of a nonaffected breast in a woman with unilateral breast cancer and is effective in reducing the risk of recurrences. Little is known about women's decision-making roles regarding CPM.
METHODS: Women aged 18-80 years with CPM performed at one of six health maintenance organizations between 1979 and 1999 were surveyed. We determined women's reported decision-making roles at the time of CPM, analyzed their trends over time, and explored the association between decision-making roles and psychosocial outcomes following CPM.
RESULTS: We received 562 responses (response rate = 73%); 431 completed items needed for this analysis. Most respondents were white, younger than 55 years at CPM, married, and had CPM within 10 years of completing the survey. Forty-five percent made the decision to undergo CPM alone, 37% considered their doctor's opinion, 15% shared the decision with their doctor and only 3% reported their doctor primarily made the decision. Women reporting active roles were more likely to be younger (P<.0008), college educated (P<.0001) and have CPM more recently (P = .002). Compared with those sharing the decision with their doctors, women with active roles were twice as likely to be satisfied 6 months following CPM (odds ratio [OR] = 2.2, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.1 to 4.2) and report current concern about breast cancer (OR = 1.9, 95% CI = 1.0 to 3.4).
CONCLUSIONS: Most women reported active or shared roles in decision making regarding CPM, particularly younger women, those with college education, and those with recent CPM. Women with active roles were more often satisfied in the short term but were also more likely to report current concern about breast cancer. Whether higher concern is related to insufficient input from clinicians should be explored. Prospective data are needed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16287886     DOI: 10.1093/jncimonographs/lgi038

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr        ISSN: 1052-6773


  16 in total

Review 1.  Contralateral prophylactic mastectomy after unilateral breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Oluwadamilola Motunaryo Fayanju; Carolyn R T Stoll; Susan Fowler; Graham A Colditz; Julie A Margenthaler
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 2.  Current knowledge on contralateral prophylactic mastectomy among women with sporadic breast cancer.

Authors:  Abenaa M Brewster; Patricia A Parker
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2011-06-14

3.  Prospective Study of Surgical Decision-making Processes for Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy in Women With Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Patricia A Parker; Susan K Peterson; Isabelle Bedrosian; Melissa A Crosby; Yu Shen; Dalliah M Black; Gildy Babiera; Henry M Kuerer; Jun Ying; Wenli Dong; Scott B Cantor; Abenaa M Brewster
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Predictors and outcomes of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy among breast cancer survivors.

Authors:  Kristi D Graves; Beth N Peshkin; Chanita H Halbert; Tiffani A DeMarco; Claudine Isaacs; Marc D Schwartz
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2006-10-26       Impact factor: 4.872

5.  Survival analysis of cancer risk reduction strategies for BRCA1/2 mutation carriers.

Authors:  Allison W Kurian; Bronislava M Sigal; Sylvia K Plevritis
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-12-07       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 6.  Cancer research network: using integrated healthcare delivery systems as platforms for cancer survivorship research.

Authors:  Larissa Nekhlyudov; Sarah M Greene; Jessica Chubak; Borsika Rabin; Leah Tuzzio; Sharon Rolnick; Terry S Field
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2012-12-14       Impact factor: 4.442

Review 7.  Where is the evidence? A systematic review of shared decision making and patient outcomes.

Authors:  L Aubree Shay; Jennifer Elston Lafata
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2014-10-28       Impact factor: 2.583

8.  Perceptions, knowledge, and satisfaction with contralateral prophylactic mastectomy among young women with breast cancer: a cross-sectional survey.

Authors:  Shoshana M Rosenberg; Michaela S Tracy; Meghan E Meyer; Karen Sepucha; Shari Gelber; Judi Hirshfield-Bartek; Susan Troyan; Monica Morrow; Lidia Schapira; Steven E Come; Eric P Winer; Ann H Partridge
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2013-09-17       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 9.  Contralateral prophylactic mastectomy in women with breast cancer: trends, predictors, and areas for future research.

Authors:  Michaela S Tracy; Shoshana M Rosenberg; Laura Dominici; Ann H Partridge
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2013-07-28       Impact factor: 4.872

10.  Contralateral risk-reducing mastectomy in young breast cancer patients with and without genetic cancer risk assessment.

Authors:  Phuong L Mai; Veronica I Lagos; Melanie R Palomares; Jeffrey N Weitzel
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2008-10-04       Impact factor: 5.344

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.