Literature DB >> 28535128

Low- and High-LET Ionizing Radiation Induces Delayed Homologous Recombination that Persists for Two Weeks before Resolving.

Christopher P Allen1, Hirokazu Hirakawa2, Nakako Izumi Nakajima2, Sophia Moore1, Jingyi Nie1, Neelam Sharma1, Mayumi Sugiura3, Yuko Hoki2, Ryoko Araki2, Masumi Abe2, Ryuichi Okayasu2, Akira Fujimori2, Jac A Nickoloff1.   

Abstract

Genome instability is a hallmark of cancer cells and dysregulation or defects in DNA repair pathways cause genome instability and are linked to inherited cancer predisposition syndromes. Ionizing radiation can cause immediate effects such as mutation or cell death, observed within hours or a few days after irradiation. Ionizing radiation also induces delayed effects many cell generations after irradiation. Delayed effects include hypermutation, hyper-homologous recombination, chromosome instability and reduced clonogenic survival (delayed death). Delayed hyperrecombination (DHR) is mechanistically distinct from delayed chromosomal instability and delayed death. Using a green fluorescent protein (GFP) direct repeat homologous recombination system, time-lapse microscopy and colony-based assays, we demonstrate that DHR increases several-fold in response to low-LET X rays and high-LET carbon-ion radiation. Time-lapse analyses of DHR revealed two classes of recombinants not detected in colony-based assays, including cells that recombined and then senesced or died. With both low- and high-LET radiation, DHR was evident during the first two weeks postirradiation, but resolved to background levels during the third week. The results indicate that the risk of radiation-induced genome destabilization via DHR is time limited, and suggest that there is little or no additional risk of radiation-induced genome instability mediated by DHR with high-LET radiation compared to low-LET radiation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28535128      PMCID: PMC5553630          DOI: 10.1667/RR14748.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiat Res        ISSN: 0033-7587            Impact factor:   2.841


  92 in total

Review 1.  Good timing in the cell cycle for precise DNA repair by BRCA1.

Authors:  Stephen T Durant; Jac A Nickoloff
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2005-09-13       Impact factor: 4.534

2.  Differential induction of chromosomal instability by DNA strand-breaking agents.

Authors:  C L Limoli; M I Kaplan; J W Phillips; G M Adair; W F Morgan
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1997-09-15       Impact factor: 12.701

3.  Radiation quality and mutagenesis in human lymphoblastoid cells.

Authors:  Howard L Liber; Rupa Idate; Christy Warner; Susan M Bailey
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2014-09-03       Impact factor: 2.841

Review 4.  RecQ helicases: caretakers of the genome.

Authors:  Ian D Hickson
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 60.716

5.  The sirtuin SIRT6 deacetylates H3 K56Ac in vivo to promote genomic stability.

Authors:  Bo Yang; Bernadette M M Zwaans; Mark Eckersdorff; David B Lombard
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2009-08-22       Impact factor: 4.534

6.  Enhanced tumor formation in mice heterozygous for Blm mutation.

Authors:  Kathleen Heppner Goss; Mary A Risinger; Jennifer J Kordich; Maureen M Sanz; Joel E Straughen; Lisa E Slovek; Anthony J Capobianco; James German; Gregory P Boivin; Joanna Groden
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-09-20       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 7.  Causes and consequences of replication stress.

Authors:  Michelle K Zeman; Karlene A Cimprich
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 28.824

8.  Ionizing radiation induces delayed hyperrecombination in Mammalian cells.

Authors:  Lei Huang; Suzanne Grim; Leslie E Smith; Perry M Kim; Jac A Nickoloff; Olga G Goloubeva; William F Morgan
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 4.272

9.  Overexpression of mammalian Rad51 does not stimulate tumorigenesis while a dominant-negative Rad51 affects centrosome fragmentation, ploidy and stimulates tumorigenesis, in p53-defective CHO cells.

Authors:  Pascale Bertrand; Sarah Lambert; Christophe Joubert; Bernard S Lopez
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2003-10-23       Impact factor: 9.867

10.  Rosa26-GFP direct repeat (RaDR-GFP) mice reveal tissue- and age-dependence of homologous recombination in mammals in vivo.

Authors:  Michelle R Sukup-Jackson; Orsolya Kiraly; Jennifer E Kay; Li Na; Elizabeth A Rowland; Kelly E Winther; Danielle N Chow; Takafumi Kimoto; Tetsuya Matsuguchi; Vidya S Jonnalagadda; Vilena I Maklakova; Vijay R Singh; Dushan N Wadduwage; Jagath Rajapakse; Peter T C So; Lara S Collier; Bevin P Engelward
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2014-06-05       Impact factor: 5.917

View more
  3 in total

1.  Reduction of Delayed Homologous Recombination by Induction of Radioadaptive Response in RaDR-GFP Mice (Yonezawa Effect): An Old Player With a New Role.

Authors:  Cuihua Liu; Hirokazu Hirakawa; Kaoru Tanaka; Fazliana Mohd Saaya; Mitsuru Nenoi; Akira Fujimori; Bing Wang
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2019-03-04       Impact factor: 2.623

2.  Replication stress and FOXM1 drive radiation induced genomic instability and cell transformation.

Authors:  Zhentian Li; David S Yu; Paul W Doetsch; Erica Werner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-11-30       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 3.  Space Radiation Biology for "Living in Space".

Authors:  Satoshi Furukawa; Aiko Nagamatsu; Mitsuru Nenoi; Akira Fujimori; Shizuko Kakinuma; Takanori Katsube; Bing Wang; Chizuru Tsuruoka; Toshiyuki Shirai; Asako J Nakamura; Asako Sakaue-Sawano; Atsushi Miyawaki; Hiroshi Harada; Minoru Kobayashi; Junya Kobayashi; Takekazu Kunieda; Tomoo Funayama; Michiyo Suzuki; Tatsuo Miyamoto; Jun Hidema; Yukari Yoshida; Akihisa Takahashi
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2020-04-08       Impact factor: 3.411

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.