Literature DB >> 24041244

An overview of the last 10 years of genetically engineered crop safety research.

Alessandro Nicolia1, Alberto Manzo, Fabio Veronesi, Daniele Rosellini.   

Abstract

The technology to produce genetically engineered (GE) plants is celebrating its 30th anniversary and one of the major achievements has been the development of GE crops. The safety of GE crops is crucial for their adoption and has been the object of intense research work often ignored in the public debate. We have reviewed the scientific literature on GE crop safety during the last 10 years, built a classified and manageable list of scientific papers, and analyzed the distribution and composition of the published literature. We selected original research papers, reviews, relevant opinions and reports addressing all the major issues that emerged in the debate on GE crops, trying to catch the scientific consensus that has matured since GE plants became widely cultivated worldwide. The scientific research conducted so far has not detected any significant hazards directly connected with the use of GE crops; however, the debate is still intense. An improvement in the efficacy of scientific communication could have a significant impact on the future of agricultural GE. Our collection of scientific records is available to researchers, communicators and teachers at all levels to help create an informed, balanced public perception on the important issue of GE use in agriculture.

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24041244     DOI: 10.3109/07388551.2013.823595

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Rev Biotechnol        ISSN: 0738-8551            Impact factor:   8.429


  57 in total

1.  US Competitiveness in Synthetic Biology.

Authors:  Gigi Kwik Gronvall
Journal:  Health Secur       Date:  2015 Nov-Dec

2.  Utilization of GC-MS untargeted metabolomics to assess the delayed response of glufosinate treatment of transgenic herbicide resistant (HR) buffalo grasses (Stenotaphrum secundatum L.).

Authors:  Siriwat Boonchaisri; Trevor Stevenson; Daniel A Dias
Journal:  Metabolomics       Date:  2020-01-27       Impact factor: 4.290

3.  Trends in global approvals of biotech crops (1992-2014).

Authors:  Rhodora R Aldemita; Ian Mari E Reaño; Renando O Solis; Randy A Hautea
Journal:  GM Crops Food       Date:  2015-06-03       Impact factor: 3.074

4.  Genetically engineered crops that fly under the US regulatory radar.

Authors:  Alex Camacho; Allen Van Deynze; Cecilia Chi-Ham; Alan B Bennett
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 54.908

5.  Conflict of interests and evidence base for GM crops food/feed safety research.

Authors:  Miguel A Sanchez
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 54.908

Review 6.  Why we need GMO crops in agriculture.

Authors:  Melvin J Oliver
Journal:  Mo Med       Date:  2014 Nov-Dec

7.  Regulation of genome edited technologies in India.

Authors:  Murali Krishna Chimata; Gyanesh Bharti
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 2.788

8.  Current risk assessment approaches for environmental and food and feed safety assessment.

Authors:  Jeffrey D Wolt
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 2.788

9.  Revisions to USDA biotechnology regulations: The SECURE rule.

Authors:  Neil E Hoffman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-04-30       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Measurement of lipid transfer proteins in genetically engineered maize using liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS).

Authors:  Ryan C Hill; Xiujuan Wang; Barry W Schafer; Satyalinga Srinivas Gampala; Rod A Herman
Journal:  GM Crops Food       Date:  2017-08-28       Impact factor: 3.074

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.