Literature DB >> 26690379

US Competitiveness in Synthetic Biology.

Gigi Kwik Gronvall1.   

Abstract

Synthetic biology is an emerging technical field that aims to make biology easier to engineer; the field has applications in strategically important sectors for the US economy. While the United States currently leads in synthetic biology R&D, other nations are heavily investing in order to boost their economies, which will inevitably diminish the US leadership position. This outcome is not entirely negative--additional investments will expand markets--but it is critical that the US government take steps to remain competitive: There are applications from which the US population and economy may benefit; there are specific applications with importance for national defense; and US technical leadership will ensure that US experts have a leading role in synthetic biology governance, regulation, and oversight. Measures to increase competitiveness in S&T generally are broadly applicable for synthetic biology and should be pursued. However, the US government will also need to take action on fundamental issues that will affect the field's development, such as countering anti-GMO (genetically modified organism) sentiments and anti-GMO legislation. The United States should maintain its regulatory approach so that it is the product that is regulated, not the method used to create a product. At the same time, the United States needs to ensure that the regulatory framework is updated so that synthetic biology products do not fall into regulatory gaps. Finally, the United States needs to pay close attention to how synthetic biology applications may be governed internationally, such as through the Nagoya Protocol of the Convention on Biological Diversity, so that beneficial applications may be realized.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26690379      PMCID: PMC4685481          DOI: 10.1089/hs.2015.0046

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Secur        ISSN: 2326-5094


  14 in total

1.  Probing the limits of genetic recoding in essential genes.

Authors:  M J Lajoie; S Kosuri; J A Mosberg; C J Gregg; D Zhang; G M Church
Journal:  Science       Date:  2013-10-18       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 2.  An overview of the last 10 years of genetically engineered crop safety research.

Authors:  Alessandro Nicolia; Alberto Manzo; Fabio Veronesi; Daniele Rosellini
Journal:  Crit Rev Biotechnol       Date:  2013-09-16       Impact factor: 8.429

3.  Drugs: Regulate 'home-brew' opiates.

Authors:  Kenneth A Oye; J Chappell H Lawson; Tania Bubela
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2015-05-21       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Embryo editing sparks epic debate.

Authors:  David Cyranoski; Sara Reardon
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2015-04-30       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Gene editing poses challenges for journals.

Authors:  Daniel Cressey; David Cyranoski
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2015-04-30       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Shaping the future of synthetic biology.

Authors:  Todd Kuiken
Journal:  Science       Date:  2015-04-17       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Biotechnology. Regulating gene drives.

Authors:  Kenneth A Oye; Kevin Esvelt; Evan Appleton; Flaminia Catteruccia; George Church; Todd Kuiken; Shlomiya Bar-Yam Lightfoot; Julie McNamara; Andrea Smidler; James P Collins
Journal:  Science       Date:  2014-07-17       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  High-level semi-synthetic production of the potent antimalarial artemisinin.

Authors:  C J Paddon; P J Westfall; D J Pitera; K Benjamin; K Fisher; D McPhee; M D Leavell; A Tai; A Main; D Eng; D R Polichuk; K H Teoh; D W Reed; T Treynor; J Lenihan; M Fleck; S Bajad; G Dang; D Dengrove; D Diola; G Dorin; K W Ellens; S Fickes; J Galazzo; S P Gaucher; T Geistlinger; R Henry; M Hepp; T Horning; T Iqbal; H Jiang; L Kizer; B Lieu; D Melis; N Moss; R Regentin; S Secrest; H Tsuruta; R Vazquez; L F Westblade; L Xu; M Yu; Y Zhang; L Zhao; J Lievense; P S Covello; J D Keasling; K K Reiling; N S Renninger; J D Newman
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2013-04-10       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  CRISPR/Cas9-mediated gene editing in human tripronuclear zygotes.

Authors:  Puping Liang; Yanwen Xu; Xiya Zhang; Chenhui Ding; Rui Huang; Zhen Zhang; Jie Lv; Xiaowei Xie; Yuxi Chen; Yujing Li; Ying Sun; Yaofu Bai; Zhou Songyang; Wenbin Ma; Canquan Zhou; Junjiu Huang
Journal:  Protein Cell       Date:  2015-04-18       Impact factor: 14.870

10.  BIOSAFETY. Safeguarding gene drive experiments in the laboratory.

Authors:  Omar S Akbari; Hugo J Bellen; Ethan Bier; Simon L Bullock; Austin Burt; George M Church; Kevin R Cook; Peter Duchek; Owain R Edwards; Kevin M Esvelt; Valentino M Gantz; Kent G Golic; Scott J Gratz; Melissa M Harrison; Keith R Hayes; Anthony A James; Thomas C Kaufman; Juergen Knoblich; Harmit S Malik; Kathy A Matthews; Kate M O'Connor-Giles; Annette L Parks; Norbert Perrimon; Fillip Port; Steven Russell; Ryu Ueda; Jill Wildonger
Journal:  Science       Date:  2015-07-30       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  1 in total

1.  A transatlantic perspective on 20 emerging issues in biological engineering.

Authors:  Bonnie C Wintle; Christian R Boehm; Catherine Rhodes; Jennifer C Molloy; Piers Millett; Laura Adam; Rainer Breitling; Rob Carlson; Rocco Casagrande; Malcolm Dando; Robert Doubleday; Eric Drexler; Brett Edwards; Tom Ellis; Nicholas G Evans; Richard Hammond; Jim Haseloff; Linda Kahl; Todd Kuiken; Benjamin R Lichman; Colette A Matthewman; Johnathan A Napier; Seán S ÓhÉigeartaigh; Nicola J Patron; Edward Perello; Philip Shapira; Joyce Tait; Eriko Takano; William J Sutherland
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2017-11-14       Impact factor: 8.140

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.