Literature DB >> 34050018

Revisions to USDA biotechnology regulations: The SECURE rule.

Neil E Hoffman1.   

Abstract

In keeping with the directive in Executive Order 13874 (Modernizing the Regulatory Framework for Agricultural Biotechnology Products) to adopt regulatory approaches that are proportionate to risk and avoid arbitrary distinctions across like products, the US Department of Agriculture (USDA) revised its biotechnology regulations by promulgating the Sustainable, Ecological, Consistent, Uniform, Responsible, and Efficient (SECURE) rule. Specifically, the SECURE rule 1) establishes exemptions for plants modified by genetic engineering where the modification could otherwise have been made through conventional breeding, 2) uses risk posed by the introduced trait to determine whether an organism is regulated, rather than relying on whether the organism was developed using a plant pest, and 3) provides a mechanism for a rapid initial review to efficiently distinguish plants developed using genetic engineering that do not pose plausible pathways to increased plant pest risk from those that do. As a result of the focused oversight on potentially riskier crops developed using genetic engineering, USDA is expected to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of its oversight program. The reduced regulatory burden is expected to promote innovation by expanding the number and diversity of developers to include smaller businesses and academics and to increase the number and variety of traits being developed through biotechnology.

Keywords:  7CFR340; SECURE rule; biotechnology regulations; coordinated framework; genetically engineered plants

Year:  2021        PMID: 34050018      PMCID: PMC8179154          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2004841118

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  24 in total

1.  Coordinated framework for regulation of biotechnology; announcement of policy; notice for public comment.

Authors: 
Journal:  Fed Regist       Date:  1986-06-26

2.  How does scientific risk assessment of GM crops fit within the wider risk analysis?

Authors:  Katy L Johnson; Alan F Raybould; Malcolm D Hudson; Guy M Poppy
Journal:  Trends Plant Sci       Date:  2006-12-11       Impact factor: 18.313

Review 3.  Hybridization in Plants: Old Ideas, New Techniques.

Authors:  Benjamin E Goulet; Federico Roda; Robin Hopkins
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2016-11-28       Impact factor: 8.340

4.  Extensive intraspecific gene order and gene structural variations between Mo17 and other maize genomes.

Authors:  Silong Sun; Yingsi Zhou; Jian Chen; Junpeng Shi; Haiming Zhao; Hainan Zhao; Weibin Song; Mei Zhang; Yang Cui; Xiaomei Dong; Han Liu; Xuxu Ma; Yinping Jiao; Bo Wang; Xuehong Wei; Joshua C Stein; Jeff C Glaubitz; Fei Lu; Guoliang Yu; Chengzhi Liang; Kevin Fengler; Bailin Li; Antoni Rafalski; Patrick S Schnable; Doreen H Ware; Edward S Buckler; Jinsheng Lai
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2018-07-30       Impact factor: 38.330

Review 5.  CRISPR/Cas Genome Editing and Precision Plant Breeding in Agriculture.

Authors:  Kunling Chen; Yanpeng Wang; Rui Zhang; Huawei Zhang; Caixia Gao
Journal:  Annu Rev Plant Biol       Date:  2019-03-05       Impact factor: 26.379

Review 6.  Sub1 Rice: Engineering Rice for Climate Change.

Authors:  Kyle Emerick; Pamela C Ronald
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2019-12-02       Impact factor: 10.005

Review 7.  A literature review on the safety assessment of genetically modified plants.

Authors:  José L Domingo; Jordi Giné Bordonaba
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2011-02-05       Impact factor: 9.621

8.  CRISPR/Cas precision: do we need to worry about off-targeting in plants?

Authors:  Florian Hahn; Vladimir Nekrasov
Journal:  Plant Cell Rep       Date:  2018-11-13       Impact factor: 4.570

9.  Problem formulation in the environmental risk assessment for genetically modified plants.

Authors:  Jeffrey D Wolt; Paul Keese; Alan Raybould; Julie W Fitzpatrick; Moisés Burachik; Alan Gray; Stephen S Olin; Joachim Schiemann; Mark Sears; Felicia Wu
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2009-09-15       Impact factor: 2.788

10.  Genetic Alterations That Do or Do Not Occur Naturally; Consequences for Genome Edited Organisms in the Context of Regulatory Oversight.

Authors:  René Custers; Josep M Casacuberta; Dennis Eriksson; László Sági; Joachim Schiemann
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2019-01-16
View more
  5 in total

1.  Lessons for a SECURE Future: Evaluating Diversity in Crop Biotechnology Across Regulatory Regimes.

Authors:  Dalton R George; Eli D Hornstein; Carrie A Clower; Allison L Coomber; DeShae Dillard; Nassib Mugwanya; Daniela T Pezzini; Casey Rozowski
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-05-02

2.  Differences in barriers for controlled learning about safety between biotechnology and chemistry.

Authors:  Britte Bouchaut; Frank Hollmann; Lotte Asveld
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-07-14       Impact factor: 17.694

3.  Life 2.0-A CRISPR path to a sustainable planet.

Authors:  Dana Carroll; Barbara J Meyer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  Potato improvement through genetic engineering.

Authors:  María Del Mar Martínez-Prada; Shaun J Curtin; Juan J Gutiérrez-González
Journal:  GM Crops Food       Date:  2021-01-02       Impact factor: 3.118

5.  Impacts of the regulatory environment for gene editing on delivering beneficial products.

Authors:  Daniel Jenkins; Raymond Dobert; Ana Atanassova; Chloe Pavely
Journal:  In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Plant       Date:  2021-08-19       Impact factor: 2.252

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.