| Literature DB >> 24040123 |
Bao-Tao Liu1, Qiu-E Yang, Liang Li, Jian Sun, Xiao-Ping Liao, Liang-Xing Fang, Shou-Shen Yang, Hui Deng, Ya-Hong Liu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The association of PMQR and ESBLs in negative-bacteria isolates has been of great concern. The present study was performed to investigate the prevalence of co-transferability of oqxAB and bla CTX-M genes among the 696 Escherichia coli (E. coli) isolates from food-producing animals in South China, and to characterize these plasmids.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 24040123 PMCID: PMC3767592 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0073947
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Distribution of ESBL genes among 429 PMQR-positive E. coli isolates of food-producing animals.
| PMQR genes (total number of isolates) | Origin (No. of isolates) | ESBL genes | No. of isolates producing ESBLs | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| |||
|
| Avian (91) |
| 18 | |
|
| 15 | |||
|
|
| 2 | ||
| Swine (116) |
| 12 | ||
|
| 9 | |||
|
|
| 2 | ||
|
| Avian (19) |
| 15 | |
|
| 2 | |||
|
|
| 1 | ||
| Swine (20) |
| 6 | ||
|
| 2 | |||
|
|
| 1 | ||
|
| Avian (17) |
| 3 | |
|
| 4 | |||
| Swine (23) |
| 3 | ||
|
| 1 | |||
|
| Avian (10) |
| 1 | |
| Swine (22) |
| 7 | ||
|
| 1 | |||
|
| Avian (4) |
| 1 | |
| Swine (6) |
| 2 | ||
|
| 1 | |||
|
| Swine (3) |
| 1 | |
|
| Avian (3) |
| 2 | |
|
| 1 | |||
|
| Avian (1) | 0 | ||
| Swine (2) | 0 | |||
|
| Avian (1) | 0 | ||
| Swine (1) | 0 | |||
|
| Avian (1) | 0 | ||
| Swine (5) |
| 4 | ||
|
| Swine (2) | 0 | ||
|
| Avian (8) |
| 3 | |
| Swine (7) |
| 5 | ||
|
| 1 | |||
|
| Avian (8) |
| 6 | |
|
| 1 | |||
| Swine (1) |
| 1 | ||
|
| Avian (2) |
| 1 | |
| Swine (1) |
| 1 | ||
|
| Avian (7) |
| 1 | |
| Swine (6) |
| 3 | ||
|
| Avian (1) |
| 1 | |
| Swine (3) |
| 1 | ||
|
| 1 | |||
|
|
| 1 | ||
|
| Avian (3) |
| 1 | |
| Swine (3) |
| 1 | ||
|
| 1 | |||
|
| Swine (2) | 0 | ||
|
| Avian (1) |
| 1 | |
|
| Avian (16) |
| 2 | |
|
| 4 | |||
| Swine (14) |
| 4 | ||
|
|
| 1 | ||
Distribution of CTX-M subgroups and alleles amongst Escherichia coli isolates from different animal sources.
| origin | ESBL(s) gene | No. of isolates | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| ||
| avian |
| 21 | |
| avian |
| 16 | |
| avian |
| 5 | |
| avian |
| 3 | |
| avian |
| 1 | |
| avian |
|
| 1 |
| avian |
| 18 | |
| avian |
| 1 | |
| avian |
| 1 | |
| swine |
| 15 | |
| swine |
| 11 | |
| swine |
| 4 | |
| swine |
| 3 | |
| swine |
| 2 | |
| swine |
| 2 | |
| swine |
| 1 | |
| swine |
|
| 4 |
| swine |
| 6 | |
| swine |
| 1 | |
| swine |
| 1 | |
Characteristics of the 18 E. coli transconjugants with plasmids harboring both oqxAB and bla CTX-M-1G/9G
| Strain | Origin | Year | genes | MICs | Other resistance profiles | Plasmid replicon type |
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NAL | CIP | CTX | |||||||
| A6T | Duck | 2007 |
| 32 | 0.06 | 256 | AMP,TET, CTI | F2:A-:B- | E |
| 42-2T | Duck | 2010 |
| 8 | 0.06 | 64 | AMP, CHL, FFC, TET, CTI | F33:A-:B- | A1 |
| FS5E1DT | Goose | 2012 |
| 8 | 0.06 | 64 | AMP, CHL, FFC, TET, CTI | F33:A-:B- | A1 |
| FS6J2CT | Chicken | 2012 |
| 64 | 0.125 | 16 | AMP, CHL,TET, DOX, CTI | F14:A-:B-N | B |
| CBJ3CT | Chicken | 2012 |
| 32 | 0.06 | 16 | AMP, CHL, FFC, GEN, CTI | HI2, N | F3 |
| FS1Z4ST | Pig | 2012 |
| 32 | 0.125 | 8 | AMP, CHL, FFC, TET GEN, KAN, CTI | HI2 | F1 |
| FS3Z3CT | Pig | 2012 |
| 8 | 0.06 | 128 | AMP, CHL,TET, DOX, CTI | F18:A-:B1 | C |
| FS3Z3GT | Pig | 2012 |
| 8 | 0.06 | 128 | AMP, CHL, TET, DOX, FFC, GEN, CTI | F18:A-:B1 | NA |
| A78T | Duck | 2007 |
| 32 | 0.25 | 64 | AMP, CHL, TET, FFC, GEN, AMK, CTI | HI2 F2:A-:B- | F4 |
| 7ganT | Pig | 2010 |
| 64 | 0.25 | 64 | AMP, CHL, TET, DOX, FFC, CTI | NT | G |
| 70zuT | Pig | 2010 |
| 16 | 0.125 | 16 | AMP, CHL, GEN, CTI | F43:A-:B16 | NA |
| 5weiT | Pig | 2010 |
| 64 | 0.25 | 16 | AMP, CHL, TET, DOX, FFC, GEN, CTI | F2:A-:B- | NA |
| A64T | Duck | 2007 |
| 32 | 0.25 | 32 | AMP, CHL, TET, DOX, FFC, AMK, GEN, CTI | HI2 F2:A-:B- | F5 |
| 2YG4T | Duck | 2011 |
| 64 | 0.25 | 2 | AMP, CHL, TET, FFC, CTI, GEN | HI2 | F2 |
| FS9Y1CT | Duck | 2012 |
| 64 | 0.25 | 32 | AMP, CHL, DOX, TET, CTI | F33:A-:B-N | NA |
| FS2Y1XT | Duck | 2012 |
| 64 | 0.06 | 16 | AMP, CHL, DOX, TET, FFC, CTI | F33:A-:B- | A2 |
| 33-2T | Duck | 2010 |
| 64 | 0.125 | 32 | AMP, CHL, DOX, TET, FFC, GEN, CTI | F18:A-:B1 | D |
| 45-6T | Duck | 2010 |
| 32 | 0.125 | 32 | AMP, CHL, DOX, TET, FFC, GEN, CTI | HI2 | F1 |
| C600 | 4 | 0.015 | 0.125 | ||||||
a RFLP patterns differing by only a few bands (n=1 ~ 3) were assigned to the same RFLP profile. NA, not analysed.
AMP, ampicillin; CTX, cefotaxime; CTI, ceftiofur; AMK, amikacin; GEN, gentamicin; FFC, florfenicol; CHL, chloramphenicol; TET, tetracycline; DOX, doxycycline; NAL, nalidixic acid; CIP, ciprofloxacin;.
Figure 1Plasmid analysis of transconjugants carrying oqxAB and bla CTX-M.
(A) S1 nuclease-PFGE (B) Southern blot hybridization with the oqxAB probe. Lane 1-18: 45-6T, FS1Z4ST, a78T, CBJ3CT, a64T, 2YG4T, FS5E1DT, 42-2-2T, FS9Y1CT, A6T, 70zuT, FS3Z3GT, FS2Y1XT, FS6J2CT, 33-2T, 5weiT, FS3Z3CT, 7ganT; Lane M: lambda ladder PFG Marker. (C) Southern blot hybridization with the bla CTX-M-9G probe (D) Southern blot hybridization with the bla CTX-M-1G probe (E) Southern blot hybridization with the floR probe.
Figure 2EcoRI restriction digestion profiles of plasmids co-harboring oqxAB-bla CTX-M group genes from transconjugants containing only one plasmid.
Lanes 1–14: A6T, 42-2T, FS5E1DT, FS2Y1XT, FS6J2CT, 7ganT, 33-2T, FS3Z3CT, 45-6T, 2YG4T, A64T, A78T, FS1Z4S, and CBJ3CT; Lane M1: λ-HindIII marker; Lane M2: DL15000.