| Literature DB >> 24039726 |
Katja Witzel1, Franziska S Hanschen, Monika Schreiner, Angelika Krumbein, Silke Ruppel, Rita Grosch.
Abstract
The soil-borne fungal pathogen Verticillium longisporum is able to penetrate the root of a number of plant species and spread systemically via the xylem. Fumigation of Verticillium contaminated soil with Brassica green manure is used as an environmentally friendly method for crop protection. Here we present a study focused on the potential role of glucosinolates and their breakdown products of the model plant Arabidopsis thaliana in suppressing growth of V. longisporum. For this purpose we analysed the glucosinolate composition of the leaves and roots of a set of 19 key accessions of A. thaliana. The effect of volatile glucosinolate hydrolysis products on the in vitro growth of the pathogen was tested by exposing the fungus to hydrated lyophilized plant tissue. Volatiles released from leaf tissue were more effective than from root tissue in suppressing mycelial growth of V. longisporum. The accessions varied in their efficacy, with the most effective suppressing mycelial growth by 90%. An analysis of glucosinolate profiles and their enzymatic degradation products revealed a correlation between fungal growth inhibition and the concentration of alkenyl glucosinolates, particularly 2-propenyl (2Prop) glucosinolate, respectively its hydrolysis products. Exposure of the fungus to purified 2Prop glucosinolate revealed that its suppressive activity was correlated with its concentration. Spiking of 2Prop glucosinolate to leaf material of one of the least effective A. thaliana accessions led to fungal growth suppression. It is suggested that much of the inhibitory effect observed for the tested accessions can be explained by the accumulation of 2Prop glucosinolate.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 24039726 PMCID: PMC3764120 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0071877
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Figure 1Relative growth of Verticillium longisporum 43-3 on PDA at 25°C for four days when exposed to volatiles emitted from 19 Arabidopsis thaliana accessions.
Red bars represent mycelial growth in the absence of plant tissue and black bars represent (A) leaf and (B) root tissue. Data represent the mean of five replicates, and the error bar represents the standard error. Significant differences between the control mycelia and those exposed to plant material are indicated by asterisks (*: p<0.05, **: p<0.01, ***: p<0.001). (C) The effect on the in vitro growth of V. longisporum 43-3 of leaf volatiles emitted from the three most suppressive accessions after four days of exposure. The red circle indicates a diameter of 1.6 cm.
Figure 2Total concentration of aliphatic and indole glucosinolates in a range of Arabidopsis thaliana accessions.
Bars represent the cumulative total of each glucosinolate class in (A) leaf tissue and (B) root tissue, and error bars represent standard deviation.
Figure 3Hierarchical clustering of the glucosinolate composition of the leaf tissue of a range of Arabidopsis thaliana accessions.
Each column represents one accession and each row the concentration of glucosinolates (µmol g−1 DW) using colour coding.
Breakdown products formed by hydrolysis of glucosinolates in the leaf tissue of selected Arabidopsis thaliana accessions.
| Bur-0 | Can-0 | Hi-0 | Kn-0 | Ler-0 | Po-0 | Rsch-4 | Wil-2 | Wu-0 | Zu-0 | |
| Alkenyl hydrolysis products | ||||||||||
| 2Prop-CN | 0.05±0.05 | 0.12±0.03 | 0.06±0.00 | n.d. | n.d. | 0.05±0.03 | n.d. | n.d. | 0.16±0.10 | n.d. |
| 2Prop-ITC | 5.30±0.84 | 9.21±1.47 | 19.74±0.51 | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. | 16.60±6.04 | 2.39±0.31 |
| 2Prop-EPT | 0.54±0.36 | 1.06±0.13 | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. | 1.12±0.87 | 0.17±0.11 |
| 3But-CN | 0.16±0.07 | n.d. | 0.16±0.02 | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. | 0.18±0.04 |
| 3But-ITC | 6.82±0.78 | 0.25±0.04 | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. | 6.44±1.00 |
| 3But-EPT | 0.65±0.38 | 0.02±0.00 | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. | 0.29±0.18 |
| 4Pent-ITC | 0.30±0.06 | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. | 0.27±0.02 |
| Hydroxyalkenyl hydrolysis products | ||||||||||
| Epi2OH3But-EPT | 0.04±0.05 | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. | 0.49±0.26 |
| OZT | 0.19±0.23 | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. | 2.63±0.35 |
| Methylthioalkyl hydrolysis products | ||||||||||
| 3MTP-CN | n.d. | 0.05±0.01 | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. |
| 3MTP-ITC | n.d. | 0.45±0.14 | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. | 0.09±0.04 | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. |
| 4MTB-ITC | n.d. | 0.08±0.03 | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. | 0.17±0.04 | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. |
| 8MTO-CN | n.d. | 0.03±0.00 | n.d. | 0.47±0.11 | n.d. | 0.02±0.02 | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. |
| 8MTO-ITC | 0.14±0.03 | 0.64±0.05 | 0.14±0.05 | n.d. | 0.21±0.10 | 0.48±0.08 | 0.36±0.13 | 0.09±0.02 | 0.40±0.15 | 0.35±0.02 |
| Methylsulfinylalkyl hydrolysis products | ||||||||||
| 3MSOP-ITC | n.d. | 0.37±0.11 | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. | 0.29±0.04 | 0.15±0.26 | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. |
| 4MSOB-ITC | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. | 2.54±0.31 | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. |
| 8MSOO-CN | 0.22±0.10 | 0.32±0.02 | n.d. | 0.17±0.02 | n.d. | 0.15±0.01 | 0.11±0.03 | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. |
| 8MSOO-ITC | 0.54±0.13 | 0.27±0.01 | 0.16±0.04 | 0.84±0.25 | 0.29±0.23 | 0.51±0.03 | 0.43±0.21 | 0.30±0.03 | n.d. | 0.17±0.11 |
| Hydroxyalkyl hydrolysis products | ||||||||||
| 3OHP-CN | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. | 0.76±0.05 | 0.70±0.28 | 0.74±0.48 | 0.76±0.21 | n.d. | n.d. |
| 3OHP-ITC | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. | 44.34±1.96 | 38.93±2.28 | 13.00±2.32 | 37.17±12.79 | 32.31±0.23 | n.d. | n.d. |
Quantities shown in µmol g−1 DW, derived from the mean of three batches of plants (each n = 50) and two technical replicates per sample. Errors denote standard deviation.
2Prop-CN: 3-butenenitrile, 2Prop-ITC: 2-propenyl ITC, 2Prop-EPT: 3,4-epithiobutylnitrile, 3But-CN: 4-pentenenitrile, 3But-ITC: 3-butenyl ITC, 3But-EPT: 4,5-epithiopentylnitrile, 4Pent-ITC: 4-pentenyl ITC, 2OH3But-EPT: 3-hydroxy-4,5-epithiopentylnitrile, OZT: 5-vinyl-1,3-oxazolidine-2-thione, 3MTP-CN: 4-(methylthio)butylnitrile, 3MTP-ITC: 3-(methylthio)propyl ITC, 4MTB-ITC: 4-(methylthio)butyl ITC, 8MTO-CN: 9-(methylthio)nonylnitrile, 8MTO-ITC: 8-(methylthio)octyl ITC, 3MSOP-ITC: 3-(methylsulfinyl)propyl ITC, 4MSOB-ITC: 4-(methylsulfinyl)butyl ITC, 8MSOO-CN: 9-(methylsulfinyl)nonyl ITC, 8MSOO-ITC: 8-(methylsulfinyl)octyl ITC, 3-OHP-CN: 4-hydroxybutylnitrile, 3-OHP-ITC: 3-hydroxypropyl ITC. n.d. not detected.
Figure 4Fungitoxicity of 2Prop-ITC on growth of Verticillium longisporum 43-3.
Effect of hydrolysed 2Prop glucosinolate on the in vitro growth of V. longisporum 43-3 was demonstrated using the biofumigation assay (A). Data represent the mean of five technical replicates per biological sample and error bars represent the standard error. Significant differences between the control mycelia and those exposed to 2Prop-ITC are indicated by asterisks (*: p<0.001). The formation of 2Prop-ITC through myrosinase-driven glucosinolate breakdown was verified by GC-MS analysis (B). GC-MS chromatograms display the product of hydrolysed 2Prop glucosinolate (black) in comparison to the hydrolysed fraction accession Wu-0 (green line).
Figure 5The effect of increased 2Prop glucosinolate concentrations in the low 2Prop glucosinolate accumulating Arabidopsis thaliana accession Oy-0 on the growth of Verticillium longisporum 43-3.
Data represent the mean of five technical replicates per biological sample and error bars represent the standard error. Significant differences between the control mycelia and those exposed to Oy-0 volatiles spiked with 2Prop glucosinolate are indicated by asterisks (*: p<0.001).
Figure 6Systemic spread of Verticillium longisporum 43-3, VD-1 and V. dahliae GU060637 within the leaf and root of Arabidopsis thaliana accessions Ler-0 and Bur-0, as measured by qRT-PCR, five weeks after inoculation.
Data represent the mean of three batches consisting of five plants each, measured in technical triplicates via qRT-PCR. Bars denote standard deviations. Significant differences between Ler-0 and Bur-0 are indicated by asterisks (*: p<0.001).