Literature DB >> 24038301

The structure of the Montgomery-Åsberg depression rating scale over the course of treatment for depression.

Lena C Quilty1, Jennifer J Robinson, Jean-Pierre Rolland, Filip De Fruyt, Frédéric Rouillon, R Michael Bagby.   

Abstract

The Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) is a widely used clinician-rated measure of depressive severity. Empirical support for the factor structure of the MADRS is mixed; further, the comparison of MADRS scores within and between patients requires the demonstration of consistent instrument properties. The objective of the current investigation was to evaluate MADRS factor structure as well as MADRS factorial invariance across time and gender. The MADRS was administered to 821 depressed outpatients participating in a large-scale effectiveness study of combined pharmacotherapy and psychotherapy for depression. Treatment outcome did not differ across treatment groups. Factor structure and invariance was evaluated via confirmatory factor analysis. A four-factor model consisting of Sadness, Negative Thoughts, Detachment and Neurovegetative symptoms demonstrated a good fit to the data. This four-factor structure was invariant across time and gender. A hierarchical model, in which these four factors served as indicators of a general depression factor, was also supported. A limitation of the current study is the lack of comprehensive characterization of patient clinical features; results need to be replicated in more severely depressed or treatment refractory patients. Overall, evidence supported the use of the MADRS total score as well as subscales focused on affective, cognitive, social and somatic aspects of depression in male and female outpatients.
Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  assessment; confirmatory factor analysis; gender invariance; major depression

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24038301      PMCID: PMC6878407          DOI: 10.1002/mpr.1388

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Methods Psychiatr Res        ISSN: 1049-8931            Impact factor:   4.035


  31 in total

1.  Evaluating the impact of partial factorial invariance on selection in two populations.

Authors:  Roger E Millsap; Oi-Man Kwok
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2004-03

2.  Factor analysis of the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale.

Authors:  W E Craighead; D D Evans
Journal:  Depression       Date:  1996

3.  Apathy and depressed mood in acquired brain damage: relationship to lesion localization and psychophysiological reactivity.

Authors:  S Andersson; J M Krogstad; A Finset
Journal:  Psychol Med       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 7.723

4.  Clinical relevance of depressive symptom improvement in bipolar I depressed patients.

Authors:  Doug Williamson; Eileen Brown; Roy H Perlis; Jonna Ahl; Robert W Baker; Mauricio Tohen
Journal:  J Affect Disord       Date:  2006-03-24       Impact factor: 4.839

5.  Component structure of the positive and negative syndrome scale (PANSS) in patients with recent-onset schizophrenia and spectrum disorders.

Authors:  J E Wolthaus; P M Dingemans; A H Schene; D H Linszen; H Knegtering; E A Holthausen; W Cahn; R Hijman
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 4.530

6.  Factor analysis of the Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale in 251 bipolar II and 306 unipolar depressed outpatients.

Authors:  F Benazzi
Journal:  Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 5.067

Review 7.  The Hamilton Depression Rating Scale: has the gold standard become a lead weight?

Authors:  R Michael Bagby; Andrew G Ryder; Deborah R Schuller; Margarita B Marshall
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 18.112

8.  Predictors of antidepressant response to fluvoxamine obtained using the three-factor structures of the Montgomery and Asberg Depression Rating Scale for major depressive disorders in Japanese patients.

Authors:  Hisashi Higuchi; Kazuhiro Sato; Keizo Yoshida; Hitoshi Takahashi; Mitsuhiro Kamata; Koichi Otani; Noboru Yamaguchi
Journal:  Psychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 5.188

9.  A three-factor analytic model of the MADRS in geriatric depression.

Authors:  R D Parker; Elizabeth P Flint; Hayden B Bosworth; Carl F Pieper; David C Steffens
Journal:  Int J Geriatr Psychiatry       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 3.485

10.  Rating depression severity in the elderly physically ill patient: reliability and factor structure of the Hamilton and the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scales.

Authors:  M F Hammond
Journal:  Int J Geriatr Psychiatry       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 3.485

View more
  8 in total

1.  Use of Clinical Global Impressions-Severity (CGI-S) to Assess Response to Antidepressant Treatment in Patients with Treatment-Resistant Depression.

Authors:  Joachim Morrens; Maju Mathews; Vanina Popova; Stephane Borentain; Benoit Rive; Beatriz Gonzalez Martin Moro; Carol Jamieson; Qiaoyi Zhang
Journal:  Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat       Date:  2022-06-07       Impact factor: 2.989

2.  Cross-sectional networks of depressive symptoms before and after antidepressant medication treatment.

Authors:  Fionneke M Bos; Eiko I Fried; Steven D Hollon; Laura F Bringmann; Sona Dimidjian; Robert J DeRubeis; Claudi L H Bockting
Journal:  Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol       Date:  2018-04-07       Impact factor: 4.328

Review 3.  Clinical Efficacy of Ketamine for Treatment-resistant Depression.

Authors:  Sosipatros Bratsos; Sohag N Saleh
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2019-07-22

4.  Testing for response shift in treatment evaluation of change in self-reported psychopathology amongst secondary psychiatric care outpatients.

Authors:  Ingrid V E Carlier; Wessel A van Eeden; Kim de Jong; Erik J Giltay; Martijn S van Noorden; Christina van der Feltz-Cornelis; Frans G Zitman; Henk Kelderman; Albert M van Hemert
Journal:  Int J Methods Psychiatr Res       Date:  2019-06-17       Impact factor: 4.035

5.  SIGMA-VB: Validity and reliability of the Brazilian Portuguese version of the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale using the Structured Interview Guide for the MADRS.

Authors:  Fernando Fernandes; Adriana Carneiro; Rodolfo N Campos; Marcio G Soeiro-de-Souza; Vivian B Barros; Ricardo A Moreno
Journal:  Braz J Psychiatry       Date:  2019-02-18       Impact factor: 2.697

6.  N-Acetylcysteine as a novel rapidly acting anti-suicidal agent: A pilot naturalistic study in the emergency setting.

Authors:  Davinder Hans; Anthony Rengel; Jaspreet Hans; Darryl Bassett; Sean Hood
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-01-28       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Changes in alcohol consumption after treatment for depression: a secondary analysis of the Swedish randomised controlled study REGASSA.

Authors:  Catharina Strid; Mats Hallgren; Yvonne Forsell; Martin Kraepelien; Agneta Öjehagen
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-11-10       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  The Influence of Probiotic Supplementation on Depressive Symptoms, Inflammation, and Oxidative Stress Parameters and Fecal Microbiota in Patients with Depression Depending on Metabolic Syndrome Comorbidity-PRO-DEMET Randomized Study Protocol.

Authors:  Oliwia Gawlik-Kotelnicka; Anna Skowrońska; Aleksandra Margulska; Karolina H Czarnecka-Chrebelska; Igor Łoniewski; Karolina Skonieczna-Żydecka; Dominik Strzelecki
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-03-24       Impact factor: 4.241

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.