Literature DB >> 15053721

Evaluating the impact of partial factorial invariance on selection in two populations.

Roger E Millsap1, Oi-Man Kwok.   

Abstract

Studies of factorial invariance examine whether a common factor model holds across multiple populations with identical parameter values. Partial factorial invariance exists when some, but not all, parameters are invariant. The literature on factorial invariance is unclear about what should be done if partial invariance is found. One approach to this problem evaluates the impact of partial invariance on accuracy of selection on the basis of a composite of the measures whose factor structure is being studied. Assuming a single-factor model holds, accuracy of selection using the composite is evaluated under varying degrees of partial invariance. A variety of examples are presented with discussion of extensions and limitations. (c) 2004 APA, all rights reserved

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15053721     DOI: 10.1037/1082-989X.9.1.93

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Methods        ISSN: 1082-989X


  67 in total

1.  Modeling trait and state variation using multilevel factor analysis with PANAS daily diary data.

Authors:  Erin L Merz; Scott C Roesch
Journal:  J Res Pers       Date:  2011-02-01

2.  Comparing Latent Means Without Mean Structure Models: A Projection-Based Approach.

Authors:  Lifang Deng; Ke-Hai Yuan
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  2015-12-10       Impact factor: 2.500

3.  Confirmatory factor analysis and measurement invariance of the Child Feeding Questionnaire in low-income Hispanic and African-American mothers with preschool-age children.

Authors:  Angela Kong; Ganga Vijayasiri; Marian L Fitzgibbon; Linda A Schiffer; Richard T Campbell
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2015-02-26       Impact factor: 3.868

4.  Quantifying the impact of partial measurement invariance in diagnostic research: An application to addiction research.

Authors:  Mark H C Lai; George B Richardson; Hio Wa Mak
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2018-11-22       Impact factor: 3.913

Review 5.  Do self-report instruments allow meaningful comparisons across diverse population groups? Testing measurement invariance using the confirmatory factor analysis framework.

Authors:  Steven E Gregorich
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 2.983

6.  The (Lack of) Replication of Self-Reported Mindfulness as a Mechanism of Change in Mindfulness-Based Relapse Prevention for Substance Use Disorders.

Authors:  Yu-Yu Hsiao; Davood Tofighi; Eric S Kruger; M Lee Van Horn; David P MacKinnon; Katie Witkiewitz
Journal:  Mindfulness (N Y)       Date:  2018-09-05

7.  Measuring illness behavior in patients with systemic sclerosis.

Authors:  Erin L Merz; Vanessa L Malcarne; Scott C Roesch; Roozbeh Sharif; Brock E Harper; Hilda T Draeger; Emilio B Gonzalez; Deepthi K Nair; Terry A McNearney; Shervin Assassi; Maureen D Mayes
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 4.794

8.  Examining Gender Differences in Neurocognitive Functioning Across Adulthood.

Authors:  Karen L Siedlecki; Francesca Falzarano; Timothy A Salthouse
Journal:  J Int Neuropsychol Soc       Date:  2019-08-05       Impact factor: 2.892

9.  Measurement Invariance Conventions and Reporting: The State of the Art and Future Directions for Psychological Research.

Authors:  Diane L Putnick; Marc H Bornstein
Journal:  Dev Rev       Date:  2016-06-29

10.  MEASUREMENT EQUIVALENCE OF NEIGHBORHOOD QUALITY MEASURES FOR EUROPEAN AMERICAN AND MEXICAN AMERICAN FAMILIES.

Authors:  Su Yeong Kim; Rajni Nair; George P Knight; Mark W Roosa; Kimberly A Updegraff
Journal:  J Community Psychol       Date:  2008-12-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.