Literature DB >> 18588590

Predictors of antidepressant response to fluvoxamine obtained using the three-factor structures of the Montgomery and Asberg Depression Rating Scale for major depressive disorders in Japanese patients.

Hisashi Higuchi1, Kazuhiro Sato, Keizo Yoshida, Hitoshi Takahashi, Mitsuhiro Kamata, Koichi Otani, Noboru Yamaguchi.   

Abstract

AIMS: Fluvoxamine, a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor, is widely used to treat major depression. However, the symptomatological predictors of the response to fluvoxamine have not been studied.
METHODS: This study included 100 Japanese patients who fulfilled the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM)-IV criteria for the diagnosis of major depressive disorders and whose score on the Montgomery and Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) was 21 or higher. Eighty-one patients were included. Patients with a pretreatment MADRS score of >or=31 were defined as 'severe' (n = 32) and the rest were defined as 'non-severe' (n = 49). The three-factor model of MADRS was used for analysis: the first factor was defined by three items, the second factor was defined by four items, and the third factor was defined by three items representing dysphoria, retardation, and vegetative symptoms, respectively. Fluvoxamine (100-200 mg/day) was administered twice daily for 6 weeks.
RESULTS: In the non-severe patients, the mean factor 3 score of the non-responders at pretreatment was significantly higher than that of the responders. However, a significant difference was observed in the mean factor 3 scores from 1 week onwards between the non-severe responders and non-responders. Furthermore, the fluvoxamine response rate in the severe patients was 75% and higher than that of the non-severe patients (65.3%).
CONCLUSIONS: This study suggested that a low factor 3 score at pretreatment was a good predictor of the response to fluvoxamine in non-severe patients. The marked efficacy of fluvoxamine in the treatment of severe patients was also confirmed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18588590     DOI: 10.1111/j.1440-1819.2008.01797.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychiatry Clin Neurosci        ISSN: 1323-1316            Impact factor:   5.188


  5 in total

Review 1.  Psychomotor retardation in depression: biological underpinnings, measurement, and treatment.

Authors:  Jeylan S Buyukdura; Shawn M McClintock; Paul E Croarkin
Journal:  Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2010-10-31       Impact factor: 5.067

Review 2.  Genetic endophenotypes for insomnia of major depressive disorder and treatment-induced insomnia.

Authors:  Ibrahim Mohammed Badamasi; Munn Sann Lye; Normala Ibrahim; Johnson Stanslas
Journal:  J Neural Transm (Vienna)       Date:  2019-05-18       Impact factor: 3.575

3.  The structure of the Montgomery-Åsberg depression rating scale over the course of treatment for depression.

Authors:  Lena C Quilty; Jennifer J Robinson; Jean-Pierre Rolland; Filip De Fruyt; Frédéric Rouillon; R Michael Bagby
Journal:  Int J Methods Psychiatr Res       Date:  2013-08-19       Impact factor: 4.035

4.  A cluster model of temperament as an indicator of antidepressant response and symptom severity in major depression.

Authors:  Vesa Paavonen; Olli Kampman; Ari Illi; Merja Viikki; Eija Setälä-Soikkeli; Esa Leinonen
Journal:  Psychiatry Investig       Date:  2014-01-21       Impact factor: 2.505

5.  Association between serotonin transporter polymorphisms (5-HTTLPR) and the MADRS Dysphoria, Retardation, and Vegetative Subscale scores in the treatment of depression.

Authors:  Hitoshi Takahashi; Hisashi Higuchi; Kazuhiro Sato; Mitsuhiro Kamata; Keizo Yoshida; Katsuji Nishimura
Journal:  Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat       Date:  2017-06-07       Impact factor: 2.570

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.