Literature DB >> 24036635

Reliability of exclusively NOESY-based automated resonance assignment and structure determination of proteins.

Elena Schmidt1, Peter Güntert.   

Abstract

Protein structure determination by NMR can in principle be speeded up both by reducing the measurement time on the NMR spectrometer and by a more efficient analysis of the spectra. Here we study the reliability of protein structure determination based on a single type of spectra, namely nuclear Overhauser effect spectroscopy (NOESY), using a fully automated procedure for the sequence-specific resonance assignment with the recently introduced FLYA algorithm, followed by combined automated NOE distance restraint assignment and structure calculation with CYANA. This NOESY-FLYA method was applied to eight proteins with 63-160 residues for which resonance assignments and solution structures had previously been determined by the Northeast Structural Genomics Consortium (NESG), and unrefined and refined NOESY data sets have been made available for the Critical Assessment of Automated Structure Determination of Proteins by NMR project. Using only peak lists from three-dimensional (13)C- or (15)N-resolved NOESY spectra as input, the FLYA algorithm yielded for the eight proteins 91-98 % correct backbone and side-chain assignments if manually refined peak lists are used, and 64-96 % correct assignments based on raw peak lists. Subsequent structure calculations with CYANA then produced structures with root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) values to the manually determined reference structures of 0.8-2.0 Å if refined peak lists are used. With raw peak lists, calculations for 4 proteins converged resulting in RMSDs to the reference structure of 0.8-2.8 Å, whereas no convergence was obtained for the four other proteins (two of which did already not converge with the correct manual resonance assignments given as input). These results show that, given high-quality experimental NOESY peak lists, the chemical shift assignments can be uncovered, without any recourse to traditional through-bond type assignment experiments, to an extent that is sufficient for calculating accurate three-dimensional structures.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24036635     DOI: 10.1007/s10858-013-9779-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomol NMR        ISSN: 0925-2738            Impact factor:   2.835


  29 in total

1.  Influence of the completeness of chemical shift assignments on NMR structures obtained with automated NOE assignment.

Authors:  JunGoo Jee; Peter Güntert
Journal:  J Struct Funct Genomics       Date:  2003

2.  Protein NMR structure determination with automated NOE assignment using the new software CANDID and the torsion angle dynamics algorithm DYANA.

Authors:  Torsten Herrmann; Peter Güntert; Kurt Wüthrich
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2002-05-24       Impact factor: 5.469

Review 3.  Automation of NMR structure determination of proteins.

Authors:  Amanda S Altieri; R Andrew Byrd
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 6.809

4.  Efficient computation of three-dimensional protein structures in solution from nuclear magnetic resonance data using the program DIANA and the supporting programs CALIBA, HABAS and GLOMSA.

Authors:  P Güntert; W Braun; K Wüthrich
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1991-02-05       Impact factor: 5.469

5.  Exclusively NOESY-based automated NMR assignment and structure determination of proteins.

Authors:  Teppei Ikeya; Jun-Goo Jee; Yoshiki Shigemitsu; Junpei Hamatsu; Masaki Mishima; Yutaka Ito; Masatsune Kainosho; Peter Güntert
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  2011-03-30       Impact factor: 2.835

6.  Floating stereospecific assignment revisited: application to an 18 kDa protein and comparison with J-coupling data.

Authors:  R H Folmer; C W Hilbers; R N Konings; M Nilges
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 2.835

7.  The program XEASY for computer-supported NMR spectral analysis of biological macromolecules.

Authors:  C Bartels; T H Xia; M Billeter; P Güntert; K Wüthrich
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 2.835

8.  Torsion angle dynamics for NMR structure calculation with the new program DYANA.

Authors:  P Güntert; C Mumenthaler; K Wüthrich
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1997-10-17       Impact factor: 5.469

9.  Fully automated sequence-specific resonance assignments of hetero- nuclear protein spectra.

Authors:  Daniel Malmodin; Christina H M Papavoine; Martin Billeter
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 2.835

10.  Principles for designing ideal protein structures.

Authors:  Nobuyasu Koga; Rie Tatsumi-Koga; Gaohua Liu; Rong Xiao; Thomas B Acton; Gaetano T Montelione; David Baker
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-11-08       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  9 in total

1.  Systematic evaluation of combined automated NOE assignment and structure calculation with CYANA.

Authors:  Lena Buchner; Peter Güntert
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  2015-03-22       Impact factor: 2.835

2.  Combined automated NOE assignment and structure calculation with CYANA.

Authors:  Peter Güntert; Lena Buchner
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  2015-03-24       Impact factor: 2.835

3.  Peak picking multidimensional NMR spectra with the contour geometry based algorithm CYPICK.

Authors:  Julia M Würz; Peter Güntert
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  2017-02-03       Impact factor: 2.835

4.  Reliable resonance assignments of selected residues of proteins with known structure based on empirical NMR chemical shift prediction.

Authors:  Da-Wei Li; Dan Meng; Rafael Brüschweiler
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  2015-03-07       Impact factor: 2.229

5.  APSY-NMR for protein backbone assignment in high-throughput structural biology.

Authors:  Samit Kumar Dutta; Pedro Serrano; Andrew Proudfoot; Michael Geralt; Bill Pedrini; Torsten Herrmann; Kurt Wüthrich
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  2014-11-27       Impact factor: 2.835

6.  An extended combinatorial 15N, 13Cα, and 13C' labeling approach to protein backbone resonance assignment.

Authors:  Frank Löhr; Franz Tumulka; Christoph Bock; Rupert Abele; Volker Dötsch
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  2015-05-08       Impact factor: 2.835

7.  Improved in-cell structure determination of proteins at near-physiological concentration.

Authors:  Teppei Ikeya; Tomomi Hanashima; Saori Hosoya; Manato Shimazaki; Shiro Ikeda; Masaki Mishima; Peter Güntert; Yutaka Ito
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-12-02       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  NMR Assignment of Methyl Groups in Immobilized Proteins Using Multiple-Bond 13C Homonuclear Transfers, Proton Detection, and Very Fast MAS.

Authors:  Piotr Paluch; Rafal Augustyniak; Mai-Liis Org; Kalju Vanatalu; Ats Kaldma; Ago Samoson; Jan Stanek
Journal:  Front Mol Biosci       Date:  2022-03-29

9.  Automatic structure-based NMR methyl resonance assignment in large proteins.

Authors:  Iva Pritišanac; Julia M Würz; T Reid Alderson; Peter Güntert
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2019-10-29       Impact factor: 14.919

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.