Literature DB >> 14649302

Influence of the completeness of chemical shift assignments on NMR structures obtained with automated NOE assignment.

JunGoo Jee1, Peter Güntert.   

Abstract

Reliable automated NOE assignment and structure calculation on the basis of a largely complete, assigned input chemical shift list and a list of unassigned NOESY cross peaks has recently become feasible for routine NMR protein structure calculation and has been shown to yield results that are equivalent to those of the conventional, manual approach. However, these algorithms rely on the availability of a virtually complete list of the chemical shifts. This paper investigates the influence of incomplete chemical shift assignments on the reliability of NMR structures obtained with automated NOESY cross peak assignment. The program CYANA was used for combined automated NOESY assignment with the CANDID algorithm and structure calculations with torsion angle dynamics at various degrees of completeness of the chemical shift assignment which was simulated by random omission of entries in the experimental 1H chemical shift lists that had been used for the earlier, conventional structure determinations of two proteins. Sets of structure calculations were performed choosing the omitted chemical shifts randomly among all assigned hydrogen atoms, or among aromatic hydrogen atoms. For comparison, automated NOESY assignment and structure calculations were performed with the complete experimental chemical shift but under random omission of NOESY cross peaks. When heteronuclear-resolved three-dimensional NOESY spectra are available the current CANDID algorithm yields in the absence of up to about 10% of the experimental 1H chemical shifts reliable NOE assignments and three-dimensional structures that deviate by less than 2 A from the reference structure obtained using all experimental chemical shift assignments. In contrast, the algorithm can accommodate the omission of up to 50% of the cross peaks in heteronuclear- resolved NOESY spectra without producing structures with a RMSD of more than 2 A to the reference structure. When only homonuclear NOESY spectra are available, the algorithm is slightly more susceptible to missing data and can tolerate the absence of up to about 7% of the experimental 1H chemical shifts or of up to 30% of the NOESY peaks.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14649302     DOI: 10.1023/a:1026122726574

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Struct Funct Genomics        ISSN: 1345-711X


  16 in total

Review 1.  Automated analysis of NMR assignments and structures for proteins.

Authors:  H N Moseley; G T Montelione
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 6.809

2.  Variability in automated assignment of NOESY spectra and three-dimensional structure determination: a test case on three small disulfide-bonded proteins.

Authors:  P Savarin; S Zinn-Justin; B Gilquin
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 2.835

3.  Automated assignment of ambiguous nuclear overhauser effects with ARIA.

Authors:  J P Linge; S I O'Donoghue; M Nilges
Journal:  Methods Enzymol       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 1.600

4.  Protein NMR structure determination with automated NOE assignment using the new software CANDID and the torsion angle dynamics algorithm DYANA.

Authors:  Torsten Herrmann; Peter Güntert; Kurt Wüthrich
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2002-05-24       Impact factor: 5.469

5.  Efficient computation of three-dimensional protein structures in solution from nuclear magnetic resonance data using the program DIANA and the supporting programs CALIBA, HABAS and GLOMSA.

Authors:  P Güntert; W Braun; K Wüthrich
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1991-02-05       Impact factor: 5.469

6.  Automated combined assignment of NOESY spectra and three-dimensional protein structure determination.

Authors:  C Mumenthaler; P Güntert; W Braun; K Wüthrich
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 2.835

7.  Ancestral beta gamma-crystallin precursor structure in a yeast killer toxin.

Authors:  W Antuch; P Güntert; K Wüthrich
Journal:  Nat Struct Biol       Date:  1996-08

8.  MOLMOL: a program for display and analysis of macromolecular structures.

Authors:  R Koradi; M Billeter; K Wüthrich
Journal:  J Mol Graph       Date:  1996-02

9.  Automated assignment of simulated and experimental NOESY spectra of proteins by feedback filtering and self-correcting distance geometry.

Authors:  C Mumenthaler; W Braun
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1995-12-01       Impact factor: 5.469

10.  Torsion angle dynamics for NMR structure calculation with the new program DYANA.

Authors:  P Güntert; C Mumenthaler; K Wüthrich
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1997-10-17       Impact factor: 5.469

View more
  38 in total

1.  Structural basis for the recognition of nucleophosmin-anaplastic lymphoma kinase oncoprotein by the phosphotyrosine binding domain of Suc1-associated neurotrophic factor-induced tyrosine-phosphorylated target-2.

Authors:  Seizo Koshiba; Hua Li; Yoko Motoda; Tadashi Tomizawa; Takuma Kasai; Naoya Tochio; Takashi Yabuki; Takushi Harada; Satoru Watanabe; Akiko Tanaka; Mikako Shirouzu; Takanori Kigawa; Tadashi Yamamoto; Shigeyuki Yokoyama
Journal:  J Struct Funct Genomics       Date:  2010-05-08

2.  Structure and mutagenesis studies of the C-terminal region of licensing factor Cdt1 enable the identification of key residues for binding to replicative helicase Mcm proteins.

Authors:  Jungoo Jee; Takeshi Mizuno; Katsuhiko Kamada; Hidehito Tochio; Yasumasa Chiba; Ken-Ichiro Yanagi; Gentaro Yasuda; Hidekazu Hiroaki; Fumio Hanaoka; Masahiro Shirakawa
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2010-03-24       Impact factor: 5.157

3.  Advances in Nuclear Magnetic Resonance for Drug Discovery.

Authors:  Robert Powers
Journal:  Expert Opin Drug Discov       Date:  2009-10-01       Impact factor: 6.098

4.  Influence of chemical shift tolerances on NMR structure calculations using ARIA protocols for assigning NOE data.

Authors:  Michele Fossi; Jens Linge; Dirk Labudde; Dietmar Leitner; Michael Nilges; Hartmut Oschkinat
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 2.835

5.  Automated protein NMR structure determination using wavelet de-noised NOESY spectra.

Authors:  Felician Dancea; Ulrich Günther
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 2.835

6.  Solution structure of the kinase-associated domain 1 of mouse microtubule-associated protein/microtubule affinity-regulating kinase 3.

Authors:  Naoya Tochio; Seizo Koshiba; Naohiro Kobayashi; Makoto Inoue; Takashi Yabuki; Masaaki Aoki; Eiko Seki; Takayoshi Matsuda; Yasuko Tomo; Yoko Motoda; Atsuo Kobayashi; Akiko Tanaka; Yoshihide Hayashizaki; Takaho Terada; Mikako Shirouzu; Takanori Kigawa; Shigeyuki Yokoyama
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 6.725

7.  Structure, interactions, and dynamics of the RING domain from human TRAF6.

Authors:  Pascal Mercier; Michael J Lewis; D Duong Hau; Linda F Saltibus; Wei Xiao; Leo Spyracopoulos
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2007-02-27       Impact factor: 6.725

8.  KUJIRA, a package of integrated modules for systematic and interactive analysis of NMR data directed to high-throughput NMR structure studies.

Authors:  Naohiro Kobayashi; Junji Iwahara; Seizo Koshiba; Tadashi Tomizawa; Naoya Tochio; Peter Güntert; Takanori Kigawa; Shigeyuki Yokoyama
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  2007-07-18       Impact factor: 2.835

9.  Structural basis of the collagen-binding mode of discoidin domain receptor 2.

Authors:  Osamu Ichikawa; Masanori Osawa; Noritaka Nishida; Naoki Goshima; Nobuo Nomura; Ichio Shimada
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2007-08-16       Impact factor: 11.598

10.  Automated assignment of NMR chemical shifts using peak-particle dynamics simulation with the DYNASSIGN algorithm.

Authors:  Roland Schmucki; Shigeyuki Yokoyama; Peter Güntert
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  2008-11-26       Impact factor: 2.835

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.