Literature DB >> 24033404

Clinical tools do not predict pathological complete response in patients with esophageal squamous cell cancer treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy.

D Molena1, H H Sun, A S Badr, B Mungo, I S Sarkaria, P S Adusumilli, M S Bains, V W Rusch, D H Ilson, N P Rizk.   

Abstract

Chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma is associated with high rates of pathological complete response. A pathological complete response is recognized to be an important predictor of improved survival, to the extent that observation rather than surgery is advocated by some in patients with presumed pathological complete response based on their clinical response. The goal of this study was to look at the ability of clinical variables to predict pathological complete response after chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. We reviewed retrospectively patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma who underwent chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery and compared those with pathological complete response to patients with residual disease. Between January 1996 and December 2010, 116 patients met inclusion criteria. Fifty-six percent of patients had a pathological complete response and a median survival of 128.1 months versus 28.4 months in patients with residual disease. When compared with patients with residual disease, patients with a pathological complete response had a lower post-neoadjuvant positron emission tomography (PET) maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), a larger decrease in PET SUVmax, a less thick tumor on post-chemoradiotherapy computed tomography and a higher rate of normal appearing post-chemoradiotherapy endoscopy with benign biopsy of the tumor bed. However, none of these characteristics alone was able to correctly identify patients with a pathological complete response, and none has significant specificity. Although the rate of pathological complete response after chemoradiotherapy is high in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, the ability of identifying patients with pathological complete response is limited. A reduction of the PET SUVmax by >70%, a normal appearing endoscopic examination, and no residual disease on biopsy all were seen in >65% of the patients with a pathological complete response. Even if these findings were unable to confirm the absence of residual disease in the primary tumor, they can help guide expectant management in high-risk patients.
© 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. and the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus.

Entities:  

Keywords:  chemoradiotherapy; clinical predictors; esophageal cancer; survival

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24033404     DOI: 10.1111/dote.12126

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Esophagus        ISSN: 1120-8694            Impact factor:   3.429


  10 in total

1.  Neutrophil to Lymphocyte Ratio as Predictor of Treatment Response in Esophageal Squamous Cell Cancer.

Authors:  Arianna Barbetta; Tamar B Nobel; Smita Sihag; Meier Hsu; Kay See Tan; Manjit S Bains; James M Isbell; Yelena Y Janjigian; Abraham J Wu; Matthew J Bott; David R Jones; Daniela Molena
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2018-05-05       Impact factor: 4.330

Review 2.  Clinical tools to predict outcomes in patients with esophageal cancer treated with definitive chemoradiation: are we there yet?

Authors:  Abraham J Wu; Karyn A Goodman
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2015-02

Review 3.  [Importance of PET in surgery of esophageal cancer].

Authors:  K Ott; T Schmidt; F Lordick; K Herrmann
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 0.955

4.  Impact of CT-assessed changes in tumor size after neoadjuvant chemotherapy on pathological response and survival of patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Sohei Matsumoto; Kohei Wakatsuki; Hiroshi Nakade; Tomohiro Kunishige; Shintaro Miyao; Akinori Tsujimoto; Takanari Tatsumi; Masayuki Sho
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2022-01-06       Impact factor: 3.445

5.  Definitive chemoradiotherapy versus neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery for stage II to III esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Arianna Barbetta; Meier Hsu; Kay See Tan; Dessislava Stefanova; Koby Herman; Prasad S Adusumilli; Manjit S Bains; Matthew J Bott; James M Isbell; Yelena Y Janjigian; Geoffrey Y Ku; Bernard J Park; Abraham J Wu; David R Jones; Daniela Molena
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2018-02-15       Impact factor: 5.209

Review 6.  Endoscopic and Imaging Predictors of Complete Pathologic Response After Chemoradiation for Esophageal Cancer.

Authors:  Guneesh S Uberoi; Angad S Uberoi; Manoop S Bhutani
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2017-10-06

7.  Editorial on "Can CT-PET and endoscopic assessment post-neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy predict residual disease in esophageal cancer".

Authors:  Chia-Ju Liu; Wei Lu
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 3.005

8.  Factors associated with false-negative endoscopic biopsy results after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Yin-Kai Chao; Chi-Ju Yeh; Mu-Hsien Lee; Yu-Wen Wen; Hsien-Kun Chang; Chen-Kan Tseng; Yun-Hen Liu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 1.889

9.  A 17-molecule set as a predictor of complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy with docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil in esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Hajime Fujishima; Shoichi Fumoto; Tomotaka Shibata; Kohei Nishiki; Yoshiyuki Tsukamoto; Tsuyoshi Etoh; Masatsugu Moriyama; Norio Shiraishi; Masafumi Inomata
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-11-14       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Advantageous factors of R0 curative conversion esophagectomy and the optimal extent of lymphadenectomy after induction therapy for cT4b thoracic esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Yu Ohkura; Masaki Ueno; Harushi Udagawa
Journal:  Ann Gastroenterol Surg       Date:  2020-12-11
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.