Literature DB >> 29548582

Definitive chemoradiotherapy versus neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery for stage II to III esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Arianna Barbetta1, Meier Hsu2, Kay See Tan2, Dessislava Stefanova1, Koby Herman1, Prasad S Adusumilli1, Manjit S Bains1, Matthew J Bott1, James M Isbell1, Yelena Y Janjigian3, Geoffrey Y Ku3, Bernard J Park1, Abraham J Wu4, David R Jones1, Daniela Molena5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Definitive chemoradiotherapy (CRT) remains the most commonly used treatment for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), because of perceptions that esophagectomy offers an unclear survival advantage. We compare recurrence, overall survival (OS), and disease-free survival (DFS) in patients treated with definitive CRT or neoadjuvant CRT followed by surgery (trimodality).
METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of patients with stage II and III SCC of the middle and distal esophagus in patients who completed CRT. Treatment groups were matched (1:1) on covariates using a propensity score-matching approach. The effect of trimodality treatment, compared with definitive CRT, on OS, DFS, and site-specific recurrence was evaluated as a time-dependent variable and analyzed using Cox regression with a gamma frailty term for matched units.
RESULTS: We included 232 patients treated between 2000 and 2016: 124 (53%) with definitive CRT and 108 (47%) with trimodality. Trimodality was used less frequently over time (61% before 2009 and 29% after 2009; P < .0001). After matching, each group contained 56 patients. Median OS and DFS were 3.1 and 1.8 years for trimodality versus 2.3 and 1.0 years for CRT. Surgery was independently associated with improved OS (hazard ratio, 0.57; 95% confidence interval, 0.34-0.97; P = .039) and DFS (hazard ratio, 0.51; 95% confidence interval, 0.32-0.83; P = .007).
CONCLUSIONS: CRT followed by surgery might decrease local recurrence and increase DFS and OS in patients with esophageal SCC. Until better tools to select patients with pathological complete response are available, surgery should remain an integral component of the treatment of locally advanced esophageal SCC.
Copyright © 2018 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  definitive chemoradiotherapy; esophageal squamous cell carcinoma; esophagectomy, recurrence; neoadjuvant treatment; pathological complete response; trimodality treatment

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29548582      PMCID: PMC5960990          DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2018.01.086

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg        ISSN: 0022-5223            Impact factor:   5.209


  31 in total

1.  Validating recommendations for coronary angiography following acute myocardial infarction in the elderly: a matched analysis using propensity scores.

Authors:  S T Normand; M B Landrum; E Guadagnoli; J Z Ayanian; T J Ryan; P D Cleary; B J McNeil
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 6.437

2.  Transthoracic versus transhiatal esophagectomy: a prospective study of 945 patients.

Authors:  Jeffrey Rentz; David Bull; David Harpole; Stephen Bailey; Leigh Neumayer; Theodore Pappas; Barbara Krasnicka; William Henderson; Jennifer Daley; Shukri Khuri
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 5.209

3.  Salvage esophagectomy after definitive chemoradiotherapy for thoracic esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Hiroshi Miyata; Makoto Yamasaki; Shuji Takiguchi; Kiyokazu Nakajima; Yoshiyuki Fujiwara; Toshiro Nishida; Masaki Mori; Yuichiro Doki
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2009-11-01       Impact factor: 3.454

4.  Phase 2 trial of induction and concurrent chemoradiotherapy with weekly irinotecan and cisplatin followed by surgery for esophageal cancer.

Authors:  David H Ilson; Bruce D Minsky; Geoffrey Y Ku; Valerie Rusch; Nabil Rizk; Manish Shah; David P Kelsen; Marinela Capanu; Laura Tang; Jenny Campbell; Manjit Bains
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2011-10-11       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  Modern 5-year survival of resectable esophageal adenocarcinoma: single institution experience with 263 patients.

Authors:  Giuseppe Portale; Jeffrey A Hagen; Jeffrey H Peters; Linda S Chan; Steven R DeMeester; Tasha A K Gandamihardja; Tom R DeMeester
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 6.113

6.  A comprehensive evaluation for aspiration after esophagectomy reduces the incidence of postoperative pneumonia.

Authors:  Mark F Berry; B Zane Atkins; Betty C Tong; David H Harpole; Thomas A D'Amico; Mark W Onaitis
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2010-09-29       Impact factor: 5.209

7.  A non-parametric graphical representation of the relationship between survival and the occurrence of an event: application to responder versus non-responder bias.

Authors:  R Simon; R W Makuch
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1984 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.373

Review 8.  Salvage esophagectomy.

Authors:  Wayne L Hofstetter
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 2.895

9.  Optimal caliper widths for propensity-score matching when estimating differences in means and differences in proportions in observational studies.

Authors:  Peter C Austin
Journal:  Pharm Stat       Date:  2011 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.894

10.  Neoadjuvant chemoradiation followed by surgery versus surgery alone for patients with adenocarcinoma or squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus (CROSS).

Authors:  M van Heijl; J J B van Lanschot; L B Koppert; M I van Berge Henegouwen; K Muller; E W Steyerberg; H van Dekken; B P L Wijnhoven; H W Tilanus; D J Richel; O R C Busch; J F Bartelsman; C C E Koning; G J Offerhaus; A van der Gaast
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2008-11-26       Impact factor: 2.102

View more
  7 in total

1.  Patterns and risk of recurrence in patients with esophageal cancer with a pathologic complete response after chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery.

Authors:  Arianna Barbetta; Smita Sihag; Tamar Nobel; Meier Hsu; Kay See Tan; Manjit Bains; David R Jones; Daniela Molena
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2018-11-24       Impact factor: 5.209

Review 2.  Update on Management of Squamous Cell Esophageal Cancer.

Authors:  John K Waters; Scott I Reznik
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2022-02-10       Impact factor: 5.075

Review 3.  [Complete response after neoadjuvant therapy for esophageal cancer : Implications for surgery].

Authors:  Julian Hipp; Michael Thomaschewski; Richard Hummel; Jens Hoeppner
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2021-10-01       Impact factor: 0.955

4.  Does the lymph node yield affect survival in patients with esophageal cancer receiving neoadjuvant therapy plus esophagectomy? A systematic review and updated meta-analysis.

Authors:  Donglai Chen; Yiming Mao; Yuhang Xue; Yonghua Sang; Desen Liu; Yongbing Chen
Journal:  EClinicalMedicine       Date:  2020-07-31

5.  Minimal invasive versus open esophagectomy for patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma after neoadjuvant treatments.

Authors:  Dongni Chen; Weidong Wang; Junxian Mo; Qiannan Ren; Huikai Miao; Youfang Chen; Zhesheng Wen
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2021-02-09       Impact factor: 4.430

6.  Primary gross tumor volume is prognostic and suggests treatment in upper esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Yuanmei Chen; Qiuyuan Huang; Junqiang Chen; Yu Lin; Xinyi Huang; Qifeng Wang; Yong Yang; Bijuan Chen; Yuling Ye; Binglin Zheng; Rong Qi; Yushan Chen; Yuanji Xu
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2021-10-21       Impact factor: 4.430

7.  Efficacy and safety of radiotherapy/chemoradiotherapy combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors for locally advanced stages of esophageal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jing Wu; Rong Deng; Tingting Ni; Qin Zhong; Fei Tang; Yan Li; Yu Zhang
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-08-03       Impact factor: 5.738

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.