Literature DB >> 24033136

Trophic cascades from wolves to grizzly bears in Yellowstone.

William J Ripple1, Robert L Beschta, Jennifer K Fortin, Charles T Robbins.   

Abstract

We explored multiple linkages among grey wolves (Canis lupus), elk (Cervus elaphus), berry-producing shrubs and grizzly bears (Ursus arctos) in Yellowstone National Park. We hypothesized competition between elk and grizzly bears whereby, in the absence of wolves, increases in elk numbers would increase browsing on berry-producing shrubs and decrease fruit availability to grizzly bears. After wolves were reintroduced and with a reduced elk population, we hypothesized there would be an increase in the establishment of berry-producing shrubs, such as serviceberry (Amelanchier alnifolia), which is a major berry-producing plant. We also hypothesized that the percentage fruit in the grizzly bear diet would be greater after than before wolf reintroduction. We compared the frequency of fruit in grizzly bear scats to elk densities prior to wolf reintroduction during a time of increasing elk densities (1968-1987). For a period after wolf reintroduction, we calculated the percentage fruit in grizzly bear scat by month based on scats collected in 2007-2009 (n = 778 scats) and compared these results to scat data collected before wolf reintroduction. Additionally, we developed an age structure for serviceberry showing the origination year of stems in a northern range study area. We found that over a 19-year period, the percentage frequency of fruit in the grizzly diet (6231 scats) was inversely correlated (P < 0·001) with elk population size. The average percentage fruit in grizzly bear scats was higher after wolf reintroduction in July (0·3% vs. 5·9%) and August (7·8% vs. 14·6%) than before. All measured serviceberry stems accessible to ungulates originated since wolf reintroduction, while protected serviceberry growing in a nearby ungulate exclosure originated both before and after wolf reintroduction. Moreover, in recent years, browsing of serviceberry outside of the exclosure decreased while their heights increased. Overall, these results are consistent with a trophic cascade involving increased predation by wolves and other large carnivores on elk, a reduced and redistributed elk population, decreased herbivory and increased production of plant-based foods that may aid threatened grizzly bears.
© 2013 The Authors. Journal of Animal Ecology © 2013 British Ecological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bears; berry-producing shrubs; competition; endangered species; forbs; predators; trophic interactions; ungulates

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24033136     DOI: 10.1111/1365-2656.12123

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Ecol        ISSN: 0021-8790            Impact factor:   5.091


  17 in total

1.  Changes in the relationship between zooplankton and phytoplankton biomasses across a eutrophication gradient.

Authors:  Lester L Yuan; Amina I Pollard
Journal:  Limnol Oceanogr       Date:  2018       Impact factor: 4.745

2.  Detecting grizzly bear use of ungulate carcasses using global positioning system telemetry and activity data.

Authors:  Michael R Ebinger; Mark A Haroldson; Frank T van Manen; Cecily M Costello; Daniel D Bjornlie; Daniel J Thompson; Kerry A Gunther; Jennifer K Fortin; Justin E Teisberg; Shannon R Pils; P J White; Steven L Cain; Paul C Cross
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2016-03-14       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Revealing cryptic interactions between large mammalian herbivores and plant-dwelling arthropods via DNA metabarcoding.

Authors:  Tali S Berman; Moshe Inbar
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2021-11-14       Impact factor: 6.431

4.  Is It Necessary Managing Carnivores to Reverse the Decline of Endangered Prey Species? Insights from a Removal Experiment of Mesocarnivores to Benefit Demographic Parameters of the Pyrenean Capercaillie.

Authors:  Rubén Moreno-Opo; Iván Afonso; José Jiménez; Mariana Fernández-Olalla; Jordi Canut; Diego García-Ferré; Josep Piqué; Francisco García; Job Roig; Jaime Muñoz-Igualada; Luis Mariano González; José Vicente López-Bao
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-10-21       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Assessing Nutritional Parameters of Brown Bear Diets among Ecosystems Gives Insight into Differences among Populations.

Authors:  Claudia López-Alfaro; Sean C P Coogan; Charles T Robbins; Jennifer K Fortin; Scott E Nielsen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-17       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Selecting the best stable isotope mixing model to estimate grizzly bear diets in the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem.

Authors:  John B Hopkins; Jake M Ferguson; Daniel B Tyers; Carolyn M Kurle
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-05-11       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  The geographical distribution of grey wolves (Canis lupus) in China: a systematic review.

Authors:  Lu Wang; Ya-Ping Ma; Qi-Jun Zhou; Ya-Ping Zhang; Peter Savolaimen; Guo-Dong Wang
Journal:  Zool Res       Date:  2016-11-18

8.  Climate change, biodiversity, ticks and tick-borne diseases: The butterfly effect.

Authors:  Filipe Dantas-Torres
Journal:  Int J Parasitol Parasites Wildl       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 2.674

9.  Limited spatial response to direct predation risk by African herbivores following predator reintroduction.

Authors:  Andrew B Davies; Craig J Tambling; Graham I H Kerley; Gregory P Asner
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2016-07-22       Impact factor: 2.912

10.  Prey use by dingoes in a contested landscape: Ecosystem service provider or biodiversity threat?

Authors:  Damian S Morrant; Christopher M Wurster; Christopher N Johnson; James R A Butler; Bradley C Congdon
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-09-21       Impact factor: 2.912

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.