Literature DB >> 31598005

Changes in the relationship between zooplankton and phytoplankton biomasses across a eutrophication gradient.

Lester L Yuan1, Amina I Pollard1.   

Abstract

The relationship between zooplankton biomass and phytoplankton biomass can provide insight into the structure and function of lake biological communities. We used a Bayesian network model to analyze a continental-scale data dataset to estimate changes in the relationship between zooplankton (Z) and phytoplankton (P) biomasses along a eutrophication gradient. The Bayesian network model allowed us to combine two different measurements of phytoplankton biomass (chlorophyll a concentration and directly observed biovolume) to improve the precision of estimates of true biomass within each sample. The model also allowed us to estimate separate relationships between P and zooplankton abundance and between P and mean individual zooplankton biomass and then to combine these two relationships into an estimate of seasonal mean zooplankton biomass. The resulting analysis indicated that seasonal mean zooplankton biomass increased proportionally with phytoplankton biomass in oligotrophic lakes, yielding a constant ratio between Z and P and suggested that bottom-up forces determined zooplankton biomass in these systems. In eutrophic lakes, seasonal mean zooplankton biomass was nearly constant with increases in phytoplankton biomass, yielding a decrease in the ratio between Z and P with increasing eutrophication. Bottom-up forces, as quantified by an increase in the proportion of cyanobacteria, accounted for approximately one fifth of the residual variance in the model as the relationship between Z and P changed from direct proportionality in oligotrophic lakes to the nearly constant value of Z observed in eutrophic lakes, suggesting that a combination of both top-down and bottom-up forces likely determined zooplankton biomass in eutrophic lakes.

Entities:  

Year:  2018        PMID: 31598005      PMCID: PMC6785050          DOI: 10.1002/lno.10955

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Limnol Oceanogr        ISSN: 0024-3590            Impact factor:   4.745


  10 in total

1.  A highly unsaturated fatty acid predicts carbon transfer between primary producers and consumers.

Authors:  D C Müller-Navarra; M T Brett; A M Liston; C R Goldman
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-01-06       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Global patterns in predator-prey size relationships reveal size dependency of trophic transfer efficiency.

Authors:  Carolyn Barnes; David Maxwell; Daniel C Reuman; Simon Jennings
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 5.499

3.  The predator-prey power law: Biomass scaling across terrestrial and aquatic biomes.

Authors:  Ian A Hatton; Kevin S McCann; John M Fryxell; T Jonathan Davies; Matteo Smerlak; Anthony R E Sinclair; Michel Loreau
Journal:  Science       Date:  2015-09-03       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Predation, Body Size, and Composition of Plankton.

Authors:  J L Brooks; S I Dodson
Journal:  Science       Date:  1965-10-01       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  The dry weight estimate of biomass in a selection of Cladocera, Copepoda and Rotifera from the plankton, periphyton and benthos of continental waters.

Authors:  Henri J Dumont; Isabella Van de Velde; Simonne Dumont
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1975-03       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Ecosystem ecology: size-based constraints on the pyramids of life.

Authors:  Rowan Trebilco; Julia K Baum; Anne K Salomon; Nicholas K Dulvy
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2013-04-24       Impact factor: 17.712

7.  Cyanobacteria dominance influences resource use efficiency and community turnover in phytoplankton and zooplankton communities.

Authors:  Christopher T Filstrup; Helmut Hillebrand; Adam J Heathcote; W Stanley Harpole; John A Downing
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2014-01-28       Impact factor: 9.492

8.  Impact of conservation areas on trophic interactions between apex predators and herbivores on coral reefs.

Authors:  Justin R Rizzari; Brock J Bergseth; Ashley J Frisch
Journal:  Conserv Biol       Date:  2014-09-03       Impact factor: 6.560

9.  Trophic cascades from wolves to grizzly bears in Yellowstone.

Authors:  William J Ripple; Robert L Beschta; Jennifer K Fortin; Charles T Robbins
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2013-09-04       Impact factor: 5.091

10.  Producer nutritional quality controls ecosystem trophic structure.

Authors:  Just Cebrian; Jonathan B Shurin; Elizabeth T Borer; Bradley J Cardinale; Jacqueline T Ngai; Melinda D Smith; William F Fagan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-03-20       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total
  2 in total

1.  Continental-scale effects of phytoplankton and non-phytoplankton turbidity on macrophyte occurrence in shallow lakes.

Authors:  Lester L Yuan
Journal:  Aquat Sci       Date:  2021       Impact factor: 2.744

2.  Spatial insurance in multi-trophic metacommunities.

Authors:  Romana Limberger; Alexandra Pitt; Martin W Hahn; Stephen A Wickham
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2019-08-08       Impact factor: 9.492

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.