Literature DB >> 24032058

Improved wait time intervals for prostate cancer patients in a multidisciplinary rapid diagnostic unit compared to a community-based referral pattern.

Perakaa Sethukavalan1, Liying Zhang, Vibhuti Jethava, Christiaan Stevens, Stanley Flax, Roger Buckley, Susan Bondy, Andrew Loblaw.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Wait times in cancer diagnosis and treatment may significantly affect a patient's treatment outcome, prognosis and quality of life. The purpose of this study was to capture wait time intervals for patients with prostate cancer treated with radiotherapy (RT) at the Odette Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada and to compare patients diagnosed in a rapid diagnostic unit (RDU) versus the usual community referral process.
METHODS: Patients agreed to participate in the study during their RT planning sessions. A semi-structured interview and chart abstraction was conducted to record key wait time milestones.
RESULTS: A total of 87 patients participated in the study: 44 RDU patients and 43 community patients. The median overall wait time intervals from suspicion of prostate cancer to RT was 138 and 183 days, respectively (p = 0.046). There were statistically significant differences observed for other key wait time intervals favouring the RDU cohort: suspicion to decision-to-treat (DTT; p = 0.012), urologist visit to diagnosis (p = 0.0094), diagnosis to DTT (p = 0.018), and diagnosis to treatment (p = 0.016). Risk category and Gleason sum was independently predictive of longer intervals from diagnosis to DTT.
INTERPRETATION: Wait time intervals from suspicion to treatment are significantly shorter for prostate cancer patients in 2011 to 2012 than in 2003 when patients were diagnosed and referred in the community setting. A prostate-specific RDU further reduced a number of key wait time intervals supporting more multidisciplinary RDUs for common diseases. Further work needs to be done to identify why delays are occurring and to develop new processes to minimize delays.

Entities:  

Year:  2013        PMID: 24032058      PMCID: PMC3758939          DOI: 10.5489/cuaj.181

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J        ISSN: 1911-6470            Impact factor:   1.862


  9 in total

1.  The impact of a delay in initiating radiation therapy on prostate-specific antigen outcome for patients with clinically localized prostate carcinoma.

Authors:  Paul L Nguyen; Richard Whittington; Sophia Koo; Delray Schultz; Kerri B Cote; Marian Loffredo; Elizabeth McMahon; Andrew A Renshaw; John E Tomaszewski; Anthony V D'Amico
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2005-05-15       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer.

Authors:  James Mohler; Robert R Bahnson; Barry Boston; J Erik Busby; Anthony D'Amico; James A Eastham; Charles A Enke; Daniel George; Eric Mark Horwitz; Robert P Huben; Philip Kantoff; Mark Kawachi; Michael Kuettel; Paul H Lange; Gary Macvicar; Elizabeth R Plimack; Julio M Pow-Sang; Mack Roach; Eric Rohren; Bruce J Roth; Dennis C Shrieve; Matthew R Smith; Sandy Srinivas; Przemyslaw Twardowski; Patrick C Walsh
Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 11.908

Review 3.  Controversies in prostate cancer radiotherapy: consensus development.

Authors:  H Lukka; P Warde; T Pickles; G Morton; M Brundage; L Souhami
Journal:  Can J Urol       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 1.344

4.  Development of indicators of the quality of radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Brita Danielson; Michael Brundage; Robert Pearcey; Brenda Bass; Tom Pickles; Jean-Paul Bahary; Kimberley Foley; William Mackillop
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2011-03-30       Impact factor: 6.280

5.  External irradiation with or without long-term androgen suppression for prostate cancer with high metastatic risk: 10-year results of an EORTC randomised study.

Authors:  Michel Bolla; Geertjan Van Tienhoven; Padraig Warde; Jean Bernard Dubois; René-Olivier Mirimanoff; Guy Storme; Jacques Bernier; Abraham Kuten; Cora Sternberg; Ignace Billiet; José Lopez Torecilla; Raphael Pfeffer; Carmel Lino Cutajar; Theodore Van der Kwast; Laurence Collette
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2010-10-07       Impact factor: 41.316

6.  Dramatic increase in prostate cancer cases by 2021.

Authors:  Harvey Quon; Andrew Loblaw; Robert Nam
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2011-04-20       Impact factor: 5.588

7.  Wait times in prostate cancer diagnosis and radiation treatment.

Authors:  Christiaan Stevens; Susan J Bondy; D Andrew Loblaw
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 1.862

8.  Distress in the radiology waiting room.

Authors:  Nicole Flory; Elvira V Lang
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2011-04-07       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  A prospective study of peri-diagnostic and surgical wait times for patients with presumptive colorectal, lung, or prostate cancer.

Authors:  E Grunfeld; J M Watters; R Urquhart; K O'Rourke; J Jaffey; D E Maziak; C Morash; D Patel; W K Evans
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2008-12-16       Impact factor: 7.640

  9 in total
  2 in total

1.  Is faster enough? Wait time intervals in prostate cancer treatment.

Authors:  Chris Morash
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2013 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.862

2.  Diagnosis, referral, and primary treatment decisions in newly diagnosed prostate cancer patients in a multidisciplinary diagnostic assessment program.

Authors:  David Guy; Gabriella Ghanem; Andrew Loblaw; Roger Buckley; Beverly Persaud; Patrick Cheung; Hans Chung; Cyril Danjoux; Gerard Morton; Jeff Noakes; Les Spevack; David Hajek; Stanley Flax
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2016 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.862

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.