Literature DB >> 11564274

Controversies in prostate cancer radiotherapy: consensus development.

H Lukka1, P Warde, T Pickles, G Morton, M Brundage, L Souhami.   

Abstract

The GU Radiation Oncologists of Canada (GUROC) had a consensus meeting in November 2000 to discuss and develop consensus on four controversial areas: risk assessment of localized prostate cancer, conformal radiotherapy, role of brachytherapy in prostate cancer and combined hormonal therapy and radiotherapy for prostate cancer. The meeting was a success and resulted in consensus being achieved on a number of areas. The group agreed on three risk groupings: low risk, intermediate risk and high risk localized prostate cancer based on clinical stage, Gleason score and PSA level. The participants agreed that based on available toxicity data from randomized controlled trials, conformal treatment techniques should be offered to patients receiving prostatic radiotherapy. Consensus was reached on the role of dose escalation in each of the three risk groups and is summarized in the article. At present there is insufficient evidence from randomized clinical trials to recommend the use of brachytherapy over current other standard therapy (radical prostatectomy or external beam radiotherapy). Non randomized published studies show promising short and intermediate term results. Where ever possible patients should be approached about participation in ongoing RCT's evaluating brachytherapy versus current other standard therapy. Outside a clinical trial the participants felt permanent seed implants should be considered an acceptable treatment option for appropriate patients with low risk prostate cancer. Based on randomized controlled trials the group agreed that patients with high risk disease should be treated with prolonged (up to 2-3 years) adjuvant hormonal therapy. Part of this hormonal treatment may be given in a neoadjuvant fashion. The group agreed that adjuvant hormones should not be routinely used in low and intermediate risk patients. Neoadjuvant hormones have been demonstrated to improve outcome in patients with bulky tumors. The role of neoadjuvant hormones in other patients with intermediate and low risk prostate cancer is unclear and will be clarified with the publication of recently completed studies. The consensus meeting strongly endorsed continued accrual to current studies investigating clinically relevant questions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11564274

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Urol        ISSN: 1195-9479            Impact factor:   1.344


  24 in total

1.  Combining radiation therapy and androgen deprivation for localized prostate cancer-a critical review.

Authors:  A Dal Pra; F L Cury; L Souhami
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 3.677

2.  Adjuvant radiotherapy following radical prostatectomy: Genito-Urinary Radiation Oncologists of Canada Consensus Statement.

Authors:  Tom Pickles; Scott Morgan; Gerard Morton; Louis Souhami; Padraig Warde; Himu Lukka
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 3.  High dose rate prostate brachytherapy: an overview of the rationale, experience and emerging applications in the treatment of prostate cancer.

Authors:  A Challapalli; E Jones; C Harvey; G O Hellawell; S A Mangar
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  The management of high-risk, locally advanced, prostate cancer radiation therapy.

Authors:  Swetha Sridharan; Padraig Warde
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 1.862

5.  Canadian prostate brachytherapy in 2012.

Authors:  Mira Keyes; Juanita Crook; W James Morris; Gerard Morton; Tom Pickles; Nawaid Usmani; Eric Vigneault
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2013 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 6.  Treatment options for localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Mira Keyes; Juanita Crook; Gerard Morton; Eric Vigneault; Nawaid Usmani; W James Morris
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 3.275

7.  External validation of the ProCaRS nomograms and comparison of existing risk-stratification tools for localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  David Tiberi; George Rodrigues; Tom Pickles; Jim Morris; Juanita Crook; Andre-Guy Martin; Fabio Cury; Charles Catton; Himu Lukka; Andrew Warner; Daniel Taussky
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2017 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.862

8.  Image guided dose escalated prostate radiotherapy: still room to improve.

Authors:  Jarad M Martin; Andrew Bayley; Robert Bristow; Peter Chung; Mary Gospodarowicz; Cynthia Menard; Michael Milosevic; Tara Rosewall; Padraig R Warde; Charles N Catton
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2009-11-03       Impact factor: 3.481

9.  The importance of local control in high-risk locally advanced prostate cancer.

Authors:  S Sridharan; P Warde
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 3.677

10.  Recommendations by Canadian urologists and radiation oncologists for the treatment of clinically localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Andrew Pearce; Chris Newcomb; Siraj Husain
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 1.862

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.