Literature DB >> 21474702

Distress in the radiology waiting room.

Nicole Flory1, Elvira V Lang.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess the level of distress in women awaiting radiologic procedures.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this institutional review board-approved and HIPAA-compliant study, 214 women between 18 and 86 (mean, 47.9) years of age completed the State Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI), Impact of Events Scale (IES), Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D), and Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) immediately prior to their procedures. One hundred twelve women awaited breast biopsy; 42, hepatic chemoembolization for cancer; and 60, uterine fibroid embolization. Data were analyzed with multivariate analysis of variance and post hoc Tukey tests. Results are reported as means and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).
RESULTS: All three patient groups experienced abnormally high mean PSS, IES, and CES-D scores, but only the breast biopsy group had highly abnormal anxiety levels. Breast biopsy patients had a significantly higher mean STAI score of 48 (95% CI: 45, 50) than did women awaiting hepatic chemoembolization (mean score, 26; 95% CI: 22, 29; P < .001) and fibroid embolization (mean score, 24; 95% CI: 21, 27; P < .001). IES ratings did not differ significantly among the groups, with a mean score of 26 (95% CI: 23, 29) for breast biopsy patients, 23 (95% CI: 18, 28) for hepatic chemoembolization patients, and 23 (95% CI: 18, 27) for fibroid embolization patients. The CES-D score did not differ significantly among breast biopsy (mean score, 15; 95% CI: 13, 17), hepatic chemoembolization (mean score, 14; 95% CI: 11, 18), and fibroid embolization (mean score, 12; 95% CI: 9, 15) patients. PSS ratings of breast biopsy patients were significantly higher (mean score, 18; 95% CI: 16, 19) than those of hepatic chemoembolization patients (mean, 15; 95% CI: 13, 17; P < .01), but they were not significantly different from those of women awaiting fibroid embolization (mean, 16; 95% CI: 14, 18; P = .23).
CONCLUSION: Uncertainty of diagnosis can be associated with greater stress than is awaiting more invasive and potentially risky treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21474702      PMCID: PMC3121015          DOI: 10.1148/radiol.11102211

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  35 in total

1.  An analysis of nursing diagnoses for patients undergoing procedures in a Brazilian interventional radiology suite.

Authors:  Liza de Souza Viegas; Ruth Natalia Teresa Turrini; Josinete Aparecida da Silva Bastos Cerullo
Journal:  AORN J       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 0.676

2.  Emotional support for patients with cancer who are undergoing CT: semistructured interviews of patients at a cancer institute.

Authors:  J R Peteet; P C Stomper; D M Ross; V Cotton; P Truesdell; W Moczynski
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 3.  Stress, social support, and the buffering hypothesis.

Authors:  S Cohen; T A Wills
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 17.737

4.  A global measure of perceived stress.

Authors:  S Cohen; T Kamarck; R Mermelstein
Journal:  J Health Soc Behav       Date:  1983-12

5.  Quantifying and predicting recovery after heart surgery.

Authors:  C D Jenkins; B A Stanton; R T Jono
Journal:  Psychosom Med       Date:  1994 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.312

6.  Perceived uncertainty and stress in illness.

Authors:  M H Mishel
Journal:  Res Nurs Health       Date:  1984-09       Impact factor: 2.228

7.  Anxiety, information, interpersonal impacts, and adjustment to a stressful health care situation.

Authors:  S M Auerbach; M F Martelli; L G Mercuri
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1983-06

8.  Anxiety in surgical patients.

Authors:  M Johnston
Journal:  Psychol Med       Date:  1980-02       Impact factor: 7.723

9.  Psychosocial morbidity in patients awaiting breast biopsy.

Authors:  A V Hughson; A F Cooper; C S McArdle; D C Smith
Journal:  J Psychosom Res       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 3.006

10.  Psychologic preparation for cardiac catheterization.

Authors:  K O Anderson; F T Masur
Journal:  Heart Lung       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 2.210

View more
  25 in total

1.  Direct communication between radiologists and patients following imaging examinations. Should radiologists rethink their patient care?

Authors:  Andreas Gutzeit; Regine Heiland; Sonja Sudarski; Johannes M Froehlich; Klaus Hergan; Matthias Meissnitzer; Sebastian Kos; Peter Bertke; Orpheus Kolokythas; Dow M Koh
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-06-25       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Meditative music listening to reduce state anxiety in patients during the uptake phase before positron emission tomography (PET) scans.

Authors:  Wen-Li Lee; Huei-Chuan Sung; Shu-Hsin Liu; Shu-Min Chang
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-11-29       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Helping Children Cope with Medical Tests and Interventions.

Authors:  Elvira V Lang; Jacqueline Viegas; Chris Bleeker; Jörgen Bruhn; Geffen Geert-Jan van
Journal:  J Radiol Nurs       Date:  2017-03

4.  Anxiety reduction and emotional self-care using the U-technique in radiology departments.

Authors:  Alberto Martinez Lorca; Roberto Aguado Romo; Manuela Martinez Lorca; Maria Carmen Zabala Baños
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2017-07-27       Impact factor: 3.039

5.  Does Patient Satisfaction Drive Volumes in Outpatient Magnetic Resonance Imaging?

Authors:  Amna A Ajam; Elvira V Lang; Xuan V Nguyen
Journal:  Curr Probl Diagn Radiol       Date:  2021-11-11

6.  Effects of Patients' Affect on Adverse Procedural Events during Image-Guided Interventions.

Authors:  Nadja Kadom; Xuan V Nguyen; Mark P Jensen; Elvira V Lang
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 3.464

7.  A Better Patient Experience Through Better Communication.

Authors:  Elvira V Lang
Journal:  J Radiol Nurs       Date:  2012-12-01

8.  Relationship between anxiety level and radiological investigation. Comparison among different diagnostic imaging exams in a prospective single-center study.

Authors:  Giuseppe Lo Re; Rossella De Luca; Filippa Muscarneri; Patrizia Dorangricchia; Dario Picone; Federica Vernuccio; Sergio Salerno; Giuseppe La Tona; Antonio Pinto; Massimo Midiri; Antonio Russo; Roberto Lagalla; Giuseppe Cicero
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2016-06-22       Impact factor: 3.469

9.  Percutaneous breast biopsy: effect on short-term quality of life.

Authors:  Kathryn L Humphrey; Janie M Lee; Karen Donelan; Chung Y Kong; Olubunmi Williams; Omosalewa Itauma; Elkan F Halpern; Beverly J Gerade; Elizabeth A Rafferty; J Shannon Swan
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2013-11-11       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Improved wait time intervals for prostate cancer patients in a multidisciplinary rapid diagnostic unit compared to a community-based referral pattern.

Authors:  Perakaa Sethukavalan; Liying Zhang; Vibhuti Jethava; Christiaan Stevens; Stanley Flax; Roger Buckley; Susan Bondy; Andrew Loblaw
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2013 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.862

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.