| Literature DB >> 24031401 |
Dalila Angélica Moliterno Duarte1, Aldemir Reginato Ribeiro, Ana Mércia Mendes Vasconcelos, Sylnei Barros Santos, Juliana Vital Domingos Silva, Patrícia Lúcia Arruda de Andrade, Lúcia Sadae Pereira da Costa de Arruda Falcão.
Abstract
The present study was carried out to evaluate the occurrence of Salmonellae in broiler chicken carcasses and to determine the antimicrobial resistance profile of the isolated strains. Twenty-five out of the 260 broiler chicken carcasses samples (9.6%) were positive for Salmonella. S. Enteritidis was the most frequent serovar. Nineteen Salmonella isolates were tested for antimicrobial resistance, and the results indicated that 94.7% were resistant to at least one antimicrobial agent. Resistance to streptomycin (73.7%), nitrofurantoin (52.3%), tetracycline (31.6%), and nalidixic acid (21%) were the prevalent amongst Salmonella strains tested.Entities:
Keywords: Salmonella; antimicrobial resistance; broiler chicken carcasses
Year: 2009 PMID: 24031401 PMCID: PMC3768528 DOI: 10.1590/S1517-838220090003000020
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Braz J Microbiol ISSN: 1517-8382 Impact factor: 2.476
Antimicrobial resistence in Salmonella strain isolated from broiler chicken carcasses
| Samples tested | Number of strains tested | Number of the resistance to antimicrobial agent | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amp. | C | Kan | Enr | Nor | Tet | Nal | CTX | Nit | Est | Gen | Cip | SXT | Pol B | AmC | ||
| 5 | - | - | 1 | - | - | 1 | - | - | 5 | 3 | - | - | - | - | - | |
| 3 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 3 | - | - | - | - | - | |
| 2 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 1 | - | 1 | 1 | - | - | - | - | - | |
| 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | - | - | 1 | - | - | - | 2 | - | - | 1 | - | 1 | |
| 1 | - | - | - | - | 1 | 1 | 1 | - | 1 | 1 | - | - | - | - | - | |
| 1 | - | - | - | - | - | 1 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| 1 | - | - | 1 | 1 | 1 | - | 1 | - | - | 1 | - | 1 | - | - | - | |
| 1 | 1 | - | 1 | - | - | 1 | - | - | 1 | 1 | - | - | - | - | 1 | |
| 1 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 1 | - | - | 1 | - | - | - | - | - | |
| 1 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 1 | 1 | - | - | - | - | - | |
| 1 | - | - | - | - | - | 1 | - | - | 1 | 1 | - | - | - | - | - | |
| Total | 19 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 6 | 4 | 0 | 10 | 14 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
Distribution of antimicrobial resistence patterns in Salmonella strains
| Patterns | |
|---|---|
| Susceptible | 1 |
| Est. | 3 |
| Nal | 1 |
| Nit | 2 |
| Est, Nal | 1 |
| Est, Nit | 3 |
| Est, Tet | 1 |
| Nit, Tet | 1 |
| Est, Kan, Nit | 1 |
| Est, Nit, Tet | 1 |
| Amp, AmC, Est, Kan | 1 |
| Est, Nal, Nor, Tet | 1 |
| Amp, AmC, C, Est, Kan, Nit, SXT, Tet | 1 |
| Cip, Enr, Est, Kan, Nal, Nor, Nit, Tet | 1 |
AMP: ampicilIN; AmC: amoxixilna + ácido clavulônico, CHL: chloramphenicol; CIP: ciprofloxacin;
ENR: enrofloxacin, STR: streptomycin; KAN: Kanamycin; NAL: nalidixic acid, NIT: nitrofurantoin;
NOR: norfloxacin, SXT: sulfametoxazol + trimetoprim, TET: tetracycline