Literature DB >> 24029833

Inter and intra-rater reliability of mobile device goniometer in measuring lumbar flexion range of motion.

Nilima Bedekar1, Mayuri Suryawanshi1, Savita Rairikar1, Parag Sancheti2, Ashok Shyam2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Evaluation of range of motion (ROM) is integral part of assessment of musculoskeletal system. This is required in health fitness and pathological conditions; also it is used as an objective outcome measure. Several methods are described to check spinal flexion range of motion. Different methods for measuring spine ranges have their advantages and disadvantages. Hence, a new device was introduced in this study using the method of dual inclinometer to measure lumbar spine flexion range of motion (ROM).
OBJECTIVES: To determine Intra and Inter-rater reliability of mobile device goniometer in measuring lumbar flexion range of motion.
METHOD: iPod mobile device with goniometer software was used. The part being measure i.e the back of the subject was suitably exposed. Subject was standing with feet shoulder width apart. Spinous process of second sacral vertebra S2 and T12 were located, these were used as the reference points and readings were taken. Three readings were taken for each: inter-rater reliability as well as the intra-rater reliability. Sufficient rest was given between each flexion movement.
RESULTS: Intra-rater reliability using ICC was r=0.920 and inter-rater r=0.812 at CI 95%. Validity r=0.95.
CONCLUSION: Mobile device goniometer has high intra-rater reliability. The inter-rater reliability was moderate. This device can be used to assess range of motion of spine flexion, representing uni-planar movement.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Reliability; iTune goniometer; mobile device; range of motion

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24029833     DOI: 10.3233/BMR-130431

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil        ISSN: 1053-8127            Impact factor:   1.398


  6 in total

1.  Smartphone assessment of knee flexion compared to radiographic standards.

Authors:  Matthew J Dietz; Daniel Sprando; Andrew E Hanselman; Michael D Regier; Benjamin M Frye
Journal:  Knee       Date:  2017-02-05       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Are lumbar multifidus fatigue and transversus abdominis activation similar in patients with lumbar disc herniation and healthy controls? A case control study.

Authors:  Luiz Armando Vidal Ramos; Fábio Jorge Renovato França; Bianca Callegari; Thomaz Nogueira Burke; Maurício Oliveira Magalhães; Amélia Pasqual Marques
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-01-14       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Reliability and validity of clinically accessible smartphone applications to measure joint range of motion: A systematic review.

Authors:  Justin W L Keogh; Alistair Cox; Sarah Anderson; Bernard Liew; Alicia Olsen; Ben Schram; James Furness
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-05-08       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Somatosensory and Motor Differences between Physically Active Patients with Chronic Low Back Pain and Asymptomatic Individuals.

Authors:  Juan Nieto-García; Luis Suso-Martí; Roy La Touche; Mónica Grande-Alonso
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2019-08-23       Impact factor: 2.430

Review 5.  Current Status and Future Directions of mHealth Interventions for Health System Strengthening in India: Systematic Review.

Authors:  Abhinav Bassi; Oommen John; Devarsetty Praveen; Pallab K Maulik; Rajmohan Panda; Vivekanand Jha
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2018-10-26       Impact factor: 4.773

6.  Relationship between healthcare seeking and pain expansion in patients with nonspecific chronic low back pain.

Authors:  Mónica Grande-Alonso; Daniel Muñoz-García; Ferran Cuenca-Martínez; Laura Delgado-Sanz; María Prieto-Aldana; Roy La Touche; Alfonso Gil-Martínez
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2020-03-09       Impact factor: 2.984

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.