Literature DB >> 25446264

The effect of inlet waveforms on computational hemodynamics of patient-specific intracranial aneurysms.

J Xiang1, A H Siddiqui2, H Meng3.   

Abstract

Due to the lack of patient-specific inlet flow waveform measurements, most computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations of intracranial aneurysms usually employ waveforms that are not patient-specific as inlet boundary conditions for the computational model. The current study examined how this assumption affects the predicted hemodynamics in patient-specific aneurysm geometries. We examined wall shear stress (WSS) and oscillatory shear index (OSI), the two most widely studied hemodynamic quantities that have been shown to predict aneurysm rupture, as well as maximal WSS (MWSS), energy loss (EL) and pressure loss coefficient (PLc). Sixteen pulsatile CFD simulations were carried out on four typical saccular aneurysms using 4 different waveforms and an identical inflow rate as inlet boundary conditions. Our results demonstrated that under the same mean inflow rate, different waveforms produced almost identical WSS distributions and WSS magnitudes, similar OSI distributions but drastically different OSI magnitudes. The OSI magnitude is correlated with the pulsatility index of the waveform. Furthermore, there is a linear relationship between aneurysm-averaged OSI values calculated from one waveform and those calculated from another waveform. In addition, different waveforms produced similar MWSS, EL and PLc in each aneurysm. In conclusion, inlet waveform has minimal effects on WSS, OSI distribution, MWSS, EL and PLc and a strong effect on OSI magnitude, but aneurysm-averaged OSI from different waveforms has a strong linear correlation with each other across different aneurysms, indicating that for the same aneurysm cohort, different waveforms can consistently stratify (rank) OSI of aneurysms.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Boundary condition; Computational flow dynamics; Inlet waveform; Intracranial aneurysm; Oscillatory shear index; Wall shear stress

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25446264      PMCID: PMC4261154          DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2014.09.034

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  49 in total

1.  Computational fluid dynamics in aneurysm research: critical reflections, future directions.

Authors:  A M Robertson; P N Watton
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2012-05-31       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Stratification of a population of intracranial aneurysms using blood flow metrics.

Authors:  Rohini Retarekar; Manasi Ramachandran; Benjamin Berkowitz; Robert E Harbaugh; David Hasan; Robert H Rosenwasser; Christopher S Ogilvy; Madhavan L Raghavan
Journal:  Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin       Date:  2014-02-07       Impact factor: 1.763

3.  Quantitative characterization of the hemodynamic environment in ruptured and unruptured brain aneurysms.

Authors:  J R Cebral; F Mut; J Weir; C Putman
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2010-12-02       Impact factor: 3.825

4.  Hemodynamic analysis of growing intracranial aneurysms arising from a posterior inferior cerebellar artery.

Authors:  Shin-Ichiro Sugiyama; Hui Meng; Kenichi Funamoto; Takashi Inoue; Miki Fujimura; Toshio Nakayama; Shunsuke Omodaka; Hiroaki Shimizu; Akira Takahashi; Teiji Tominaga
Journal:  World Neurosurg       Date:  2011-11-01       Impact factor: 2.104

5.  On the relative importance of rheology for image-based CFD models of the carotid bifurcation.

Authors:  Sang-Wook Lee; David A Steinman
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 2.097

6.  Prevalence and risk of rupture of intracranial aneurysms: a systematic review.

Authors:  G J Rinkel; M Djibuti; A Algra; J van Gijn
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 7.914

7.  Newtonian viscosity model could overestimate wall shear stress in intracranial aneurysm domes and underestimate rupture risk.

Authors:  Jianping Xiang; Markus Tremmel; John Kolega; Elad I Levy; Sabareesh K Natarajan; Hui Meng
Journal:  J Neurointerv Surg       Date:  2011-09-19       Impact factor: 5.836

8.  Computational approach to quantifying hemodynamic forces in giant cerebral aneurysms.

Authors:  Liang-Der Jou; Christopher M Quick; William L Young; Michael T Lawton; Randall Higashida; Alastair Martin; David Saloner
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 3.825

9.  Computational replicas: anatomic reconstructions of cerebral vessels as volume numerical grids at three-dimensional angiography.

Authors:  Tamer Hassan; Eugene V Timofeev; Tsutomu Saito; Hiroaki Shimizu; Masayuki Ezura; Teiji Tominaga; Akira Takahashi; Kazuyoshi Takayama
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 3.825

10.  Mortality rates after subarachnoid hemorrhage: variations according to hospital case volume in 18 states.

Authors:  DeWitte T Cross; David L Tirschwell; Mary Ann Clark; Dan Tuden; Colin P Derdeyn; Christopher J Moran; Ralph G Dacey
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 5.115

View more
  10 in total

1.  A non-dimensional parameter for classification of the flow in intracranial aneurysms. I. Simplified geometries.

Authors:  Hafez Asgharzadeh; Iman Borazjani
Journal:  Phys Fluids (1994)       Date:  2019-03-26       Impact factor: 3.521

2.  A non-dimensional parameter for classification of the flow in intracranial aneurysms. II. Patient-specific geometries.

Authors:  Hafez Asgharzadeh; Hossein Asadi; Hui Meng; Iman Borazjani
Journal:  Phys Fluids (1994)       Date:  2019-03-26       Impact factor: 3.521

3.  A Newton-Krylov method with an approximate analytical Jacobian for implicit solution of Navier-Stokes equations on staggered overset-curvilinear grids with immersed boundaries.

Authors:  Hafez Asgharzadeh; Iman Borazjani
Journal:  J Comput Phys       Date:  2016-11-25       Impact factor: 3.553

4.  A Simple Flow Classification Parameter Can Discriminate Rupture Status in Intracranial Aneurysms.

Authors:  Hafez Asgharzadeh; Ali Shahmohammadi; Nicole Varble; Elad I Levy; Hui Meng; Iman Borazjani
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2020-10-15       Impact factor: 4.654

5.  Initial Clinical Experience with AView-A Clinical Computational Platform for Intracranial Aneurysm Morphology, Hemodynamics, and Treatment Management.

Authors:  Jianping Xiang; Nicole Varble; Jason M Davies; Ansaar T Rai; Kenichi Kono; Shin-Ichiro Sugiyama; Mandy J Binning; Rabih G Tawk; Hoon Choi; Andrew J Ringer; Kenneth V Snyder; Elad I Levy; L Nelson Hopkins; Adnan H Siddiqui; Hui Meng
Journal:  World Neurosurg       Date:  2017-09-15       Impact factor: 2.104

6.  Quantification of near-wall hemodynamic risk factors in large-scale cerebral arterial trees.

Authors:  Mahsa Ghaffari; Ali Alaraj; Xinjian Du; Xiaohong Joe Zhou; Fady T Charbel; Andreas A Linninger
Journal:  Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng       Date:  2018-05-23       Impact factor: 2.747

7.  The Morphological and Hemodynamic Characteristics of the Intraoperative Ruptured Aneurysm.

Authors:  Qingyuan Liu; Pengjun Jiang; Jun Wu; Bin Gao; Shuo Wang
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2019-03-26       Impact factor: 4.677

8.  Rebleeding of Ruptured Intracranial Aneurysm After Admission: A Multidimensional Nomogram Model to Risk Assessment.

Authors:  Qingyuan Liu; Yi Yang; Junhua Yang; Maogui Li; Shuzhe Yang; Nuochuan Wang; Jun Wu; Pengjun Jiang; Shuo Wang
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2021-09-01       Impact factor: 5.750

9.  Effects of Pulsatile Flow Rate and Shunt Ratio in Bifurcated Distal Arteries on Hemodynamic Characteristics Involved in Two Patient-Specific Internal Carotid Artery Sidewall Aneurysms: A Numerical Study.

Authors:  Hang Yi; Mark Johnson; Luke C Bramlage; Bryan Ludwig; Zifeng Yang
Journal:  Bioengineering (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-18

10.  A Dissipation Function-Based Method for Calculating the Energy Loss of Intracranial Aneurysms.

Authors:  Xiao Mo; Hongshi Yu; Rong Chen; Zhenpeng Chen; Haiyun Li
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2021-07-08       Impact factor: 4.003

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.