Literature DB >> 24026808

Eliminating host-mediated effects demonstrates Bt maize producing Cry1F has no adverse effects on the parasitoid Cotesia marginiventris.

Jun-Ce Tian1, Xiang-Ping Wang, Li-Ping Long, Jörg Romeis, Steven E Naranjo, Richard L Hellmich, Anthony M Shelton.   

Abstract

The fall armyworm, Spodoptera frugiperda (J. E. Smith) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae), is an important pest of maize in the United States and many tropical areas in the western hemisphere. In 2001, Herculex I(®) (Cry1F) maize was commercially planted in the United States to control Lepidoptera, including S. frugiperda. In 2006, a population of S. frugiperda was discovered in Puerto Rico that had evolved resistance to Cry1F maize in the field, making it the first well-documented case of an insect with field resistance to a plant producing protein from Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt). Using this resistant population, we conducted tri-trophic studies with a natural enemy of S. frugiperda. By using resistant S. frugiperda, we were able to overcome possible prey-mediated effects and avoid concerns about potential differences in laboratory- or field-derived Bt resistance. We used the Cry1F-resistant S. frugiperda to evaluate effects of Cry1F on Cotesia marginiventris (Cresson) (Hymenoptera: Braconidae), a larval endoparasitoid of S. frugiperda, over five generations. Our results clearly demonstrate that Cry1F maize does not affect development, parasitism, survivorship, sex ratio, longevity or fecundity of C. marginiventris when they parasitize Cry1F maize-fed S. frugiperda. Furthermore, the level of Cry1F protein in the leaves was strongly diluted when transferred from Bt maize to S. frugiperda and was not detected in larvae, cocoons or adults of C. marginiventris. Our results refute previous reports of C. marginiventris being harmed by Bt proteins and suggest that such results were caused by prey-mediated effects due to using Bt-susceptible lepidopteran hosts.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24026808     DOI: 10.1007/s11248-013-9748-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transgenic Res        ISSN: 0962-8819            Impact factor:   2.788


  22 in total

1.  Assessment of risk of insect-resistant transgenic crops to nontarget arthropods.

Authors:  Jörg Romeis; Detlef Bartsch; Franz Bigler; Marco P Candolfi; Marco M C Gielkens; Susan E Hartley; Richard L Hellmich; Joseph E Huesing; Paul C Jepson; Raymond Layton; Hector Quemada; Alan Raybould; Robyn I Rose; Joachim Schiemann; Mark K Sears; Anthony M Shelton; Jeremy Sweet; Zigfridas Vaituzis; Jeffrey D Wolt
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 54.908

2.  Setting the record straight: a rebuttal to an erroneous analysis on transgenic insecticidal crops and natural enemies.

Authors:  Anthony M Shelton; Steven E Naranjo; Jörg Romeis; Richard L Hellmich; Jeffrey D Wolt; Brian A Federici; Ramon Albajes; Franz Bigler; Elisabeth P J Burgess; Galen P Dively; Angharad M R Gatehouse; Louise A Malone; Richard Roush; Mark Sears; Frantisek Sehnal
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 2.788

3.  Appropriate analytical methods are necessary to assess nontarget effects of insecticidal proteins in GM crops through meta-analysis (response to Andow et al. 2009).

Authors:  Anthony M Shelton; Steven E Naranjo; Jörg Romeis; Richard L Hellmich; Jeffrey D Wolt; Brian A Federici; Ramon Albajes; Franz Bigler; Elisabeth P J Burgess; Galen P Dively; Angharad M R Gatehouse; Louise A Malone; Richard Roush; Mark Sears; Frantisek Sehnal; Natalie Ferry; Howard A Bell
Journal:  Environ Entomol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 2.377

4.  When bad science makes good headlines: Bt maize and regulatory bans.

Authors:  Jörg Romeis; Morven A McLean; Anthony M Shelton
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 54.908

Review 5.  Economic, ecological, food safety, and social consequences of the deployment of bt transgenic plants.

Authors:  A M Shelton; J-Z Zhao; R T Roush
Journal:  Annu Rev Entomol       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 19.686

6.  Discovery and characterization of field resistance to Bt maize: Spodoptera frugiperda (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in Puerto Rico.

Authors:  Nicholas P Storer; Jonathan M Babcock; Michele Schlenz; Thomas Meade; Gary D Thompson; James W Bing; Randy M Huckaba
Journal:  J Econ Entomol       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 2.381

Review 7.  Field-evolved insect resistance to Bt crops: definition, theory, and data.

Authors:  Bruce E Tabashnik; J B J Van Rensburg; Yves Carrière
Journal:  J Econ Entomol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 2.381

8.  A meta-analysis of effects of Bt cotton and maize on nontarget invertebrates.

Authors:  Michelle Marvier; Chanel McCreedy; James Regetz; Peter Kareiva
Journal:  Science       Date:  2007-06-08       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Effects of Bt plants on the development and survival of the parasitoid Cotesia plutellae (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) in susceptible and Bt-resistant larvae of the diamondback moth, Plutella xylostella (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae).

Authors:  Tanja H Schuler; Ian Denholm; Suzanne J Clark; C Neal Stewart; Guy M Poppy
Journal:  J Insect Physiol       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 2.354

10.  Using field-evolved resistance to Cry1F maize in a lepidopteran pest to demonstrate no adverse effects of Cry1F on one of its major predators.

Authors:  Jun-Ce Tian; Hilda L Collins; Jörg Romeis; Steven E Naranjo; Richard L Hellmich; Anthony M Shelton
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2012-02-29       Impact factor: 2.788

View more
  6 in total

1.  The interaction of two-spotted spider mites, Tetranychus urticae Koch, with Cry protein production and predation by Amblyseius andersoni (Chant) in Cry1Ac/Cry2Ab cotton and Cry1F maize.

Authors:  Yan-Yan Guo; Jun-Ce Tian; Wang-Peng Shi; Xue-Hui Dong; Jörg Romeis; Steven E Naranjo; Richard L Hellmich; Anthony M Shelton
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2015-11-06       Impact factor: 2.788

Review 2.  Transgenic maize event TC1507: Global status of food, feed, and environmental safety.

Authors:  Gajendra B Baktavachalam; Bryan Delaney; Tracey L Fisher; Gregory S Ladics; Raymond J Layton; Mary Eh Locke; Jean Schmidt; Jennifer A Anderson; Natalie N Weber; Rod A Herman; Steven L Evans
Journal:  GM Crops Food       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 3.074

3.  Biocontrol of the oriental armyworm, Mythimna separata, by the tachinid fly Exorista civilis is synergized by Cry1Ab protoxin.

Authors:  Xingfu Jiang; Lei Zhang; Haixia Yang; Thomas W Sappington; Yunxia Cheng; Li Zhi Luo
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-06-21       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Bt cotton producing Cry1Ac and Cry2Ab does not harm two parasitoids, Cotesia marginiventris and Copidosoma floridanum.

Authors:  Jun-Ce Tian; Xiang-Ping Wang; Yang Chen; Jörg Romeis; Steven E Naranjo; Richard L Hellmich; Ping Wang; Anthony M Shelton
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-01-10       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Assessing the effects of Cry1C rice and Cry2A rice to Pseudogonatopus flavifemur, a parasitoid of rice planthoppers.

Authors:  Jun-Ce Tian; Jörg Romeis; Kai Liu; Fa-Cheng Zhang; Xu-Song Zheng; Hong-Xing Xu; Gui-Hua Chen; Xiao-Chan He; Zhong-Xian Lu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-08-10       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 6.  Integration of Plant Defense Traits with Biological Control of Arthropod Pests: Challenges and Opportunities.

Authors:  Julie A Peterson; Paul J Ode; Camila Oliveira-Hofman; James D Harwood
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2016-11-30       Impact factor: 5.753

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.