Literature DB >> 24026069

Radiographic evaluation of INBONE total ankle arthroplasty: a retrospective analysis of 30 cases.

Abhijit Datir1, Minzhi Xing, Aparna Kakarala, Michael R Terk, Sameh A Labib.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this work were to retrospectively describe the radiographic assessment of INBONE total ankle arthroplasty in 30 patients using validated linear and angular measurements and to correlate these findings with the final surgical outcome over a 2-year follow-up period.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty consecutive patients (21 females, nine males; mean age, 64.8 years) underwent INBONE total ankle arthroplasty during 2007-2011. After IRB approval, a retrospective pre- and post-operative radiographic analysis was performed using validated linear and angular measurements. The pre- and post-operative assessment included the tibial angle, talar angle, tibial slope, and coronal deformity. Post-operative measurements also included the talocalcaneal angle, joint space height, talar height, lateral tibial component angle, lateral talar component angle, and anteroposterior tibial component angle. The post-operative bone loss, subluxation, positioning, and subsidence were also assessed. Statistical analysis was performed using two-sample t test and Fisher's exact test.
RESULTS: Out of 30 patients, 23 had a successful clinical outcome with intact prosthesis at a 2-year follow-up. The only variables with significant correlation (p < 0.05) to the post-surgical outcome were the lateral talar component angle (p = 0.002) and the mean difference between pre- and post-operative tibial slope (p = 0.001). The coronal deformity had significant mean difference between pre- and post-operative values (p < 0.001); however, it lacked a significant correlation to the final surgical outcome. None of the categorical variables had a significant correlation with post-surgical outcome.
CONCLUSIONS: In our retrospective study, only the lateral talar component angle and the mean difference between the pre- and post-operative tibial slope had significant correlation with post-surgical outcome in INBONE ankle arthroplasty. These measurements may be helpful in radiographic assessment of the INBONE ankle arthroplasty.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24026069     DOI: 10.1007/s00256-013-1718-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Skeletal Radiol        ISSN: 0364-2348            Impact factor:   2.199


  15 in total

Review 1.  Design features of current total ankle replacements: implants and instrumentation.

Authors:  Andrea Cracchiolo; James K Deorio
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 3.020

2.  Cost-effectiveness analysis of total ankle arthroplasty.

Authors:  Nelson F SooHoo; Gerald Kominski
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 5.284

3.  Midterm results of the Salto Total Ankle Prosthesis.

Authors:  M Bonnin; T Judet; J A Colombier; F Buscayret; N Graveleau; P Piriou
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Ankle replacement versus arthrodesis: a comparative gait analysis study.

Authors:  Philippe Piriou; Paul Culpan; Mark Mullins; Jean-Noel Cardon; Delphine Pozzi; Thierry Judet
Journal:  Foot Ankle Int       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 2.827

5.  Total ankle arthroplasty: a unique design. Two to twelve-year follow-up.

Authors:  M T Pyevich; C L Saltzman; J J Callaghan; F G Alvine
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  Total ankle arthroplasty with the Agility prosthesis: clinical and radiographic evaluation.

Authors:  Franz J Kopp; Mihir M Patel; Jonathan T Deland; Martin J O'Malley
Journal:  Foot Ankle Int       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 2.827

7.  Gait analysis and functional outcomes following ankle arthrodesis for isolated ankle arthritis.

Authors:  Rhys Thomas; Tim R Daniels; Kim Parker
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  Comparison of reoperation rates following ankle arthrodesis and total ankle arthroplasty.

Authors:  Nelson F SooHoo; David S Zingmond; Clifford Y Ko
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  New Jersey low contact stress total ankle replacement: biomechanical rationale and review of 23 cementless cases.

Authors:  F F Buechel; M J Pappas; L J Iorio
Journal:  Foot Ankle       Date:  1988-06

10.  Prospective controlled trial of STAR total ankle replacement versus ankle fusion: initial results.

Authors:  Charles L Saltzman; Roger A Mann; Jeanette E Ahrens; Annunziato Amendola; Robert B Anderson; Gregory C Berlet; James W Brodsky; Loretta B Chou; Thomas O Clanton; Jonathan T Deland; James K Deorio; Greg A Horton; Thomas H Lee; Jeffrey A Mann; James A Nunley; David B Thordarson; Arthur K Walling; Keith L Wapner; Michael J Coughlin
Journal:  Foot Ankle Int       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 2.827

View more
  2 in total

1.  Sagittal Tibiotalar Alignment May Not Affect Functional Outcomes in Fixed-Bearing Total Ankle Replacement: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Natalie M Nielsen; Guilherme H Saito; Austin E Sanders; Scott J Ellis; Carolyn M Sofka; Constantine A Demetracopoulos
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2019-11-22

2.  Reliability of the Radiographic Sagittal and Frontal Tibiotalar Alignment after Ankle Arthrodesis.

Authors:  Madeleine Willegger; Johannes Holinka; Elena Nemecek; Peter Bock; Axel Hugo Wanivenhaus; Reinhard Windhager; Reinhard Schuh
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-04-28       Impact factor: 3.240

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.