Literature DB >> 18768710

Design features of current total ankle replacements: implants and instrumentation.

Andrea Cracchiolo1, James K Deorio.   

Abstract

Development of total ankle replacements began nearly 40 years ago. The initial devices were cemented and highly constrained, and they eventually failed. These were followed by second-generation cementless ankle implants with a fixed (two-component design) or mobile (three-component design) polyethylene bearing. Currently, four ankle replacements are approved by the US Food and Drug Administration. These four-Agility, INBONE, Salto-Talaris, and Eclipse-are two-component designs; the Scandinavian Total Ankle Replacement, a three-part mobile-bearing design, has been recommended for approval by the FDA. It is anticipated to arrive in the US market in late 2008. Although interest in total ankle replacements is increasing, midterm clinical results to date are few and often have not been validated by independent practitioners. In addition, no level I or II studies have been published. Therefore, the design rationale for these implants and instruments should be carefully evaluated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18768710

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg        ISSN: 1067-151X            Impact factor:   3.020


  17 in total

1.  Radiographic evaluation of INBONE total ankle arthroplasty: a retrospective analysis of 30 cases.

Authors:  Abhijit Datir; Minzhi Xing; Aparna Kakarala; Michael R Terk; Sameh A Labib
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2013-09-12       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Position of the prosthesis components in total ankle replacement and the effect on motion at the replaced joint.

Authors:  Francesco Cenni; Alberto Leardini; Andrea Cheli; Fabio Catani; Claudio Belvedere; Matteo Romagnoli; Sandro Giannini
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2011-07-26       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Are There Differences in Gait Mechanics in Patients With A Fixed Versus Mobile Bearing Total Ankle Arthroplasty? A Randomized Trial.

Authors:  Robin M Queen; Christopher T Franck; Daniel Schmitt; Samuel B Adams
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-06-06       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Total ankle replacement compatible with ligament function produces mobility, good clinical scores, and low complication rates: an early clinical assessment.

Authors:  Sandro Giannini; Matteo Romagnoli; John J O'Connor; Francesco Malerba; Alberto Leardini
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-06-18       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  The scandinavian total ankle replacement: survivorship at 5 and 8 years comparable to other series.

Authors:  Alexia Karantana; Sally Hobson; Sunil Dhar
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-07-16       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 6.  How successful are current ankle replacements?: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Nikolaos Gougoulias; Anil Khanna; Nicola Maffulli
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-07-18       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Total ankle arthroplasty in end-stage ankle arthritis.

Authors:  Constantine A Demetracopoulos; James P Halloran; Paul Maloof; Samuel B Adams; Selene G Parekh
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2013-12

8.  Total Ankle Arthroplasty with a Modern Fixed-Bearing System: The Salto Talaris Prosthesis.

Authors:  Karl M Schweitzer; Samuel B Adams; Mark E Easley; James K DeOrio; James A Nunley
Journal:  JBJS Essent Surg Tech       Date:  2013-09-25

9.  When is it Safe to Drive After Total Ankle Arthroplasty?

Authors:  Elizabeth L McDonald; David I Pedowitz; Rachel J Shakked; Daniel J Fuchs; Brian S Winters; Joseph N Daniel; Steven M Raikin
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 4.755

10.  Trends in total ankle arthroplasty and revisions in the Medicare database.

Authors:  Tsun Yee Law; Karim G Sabeh; Samuel Rosas; Zachary Hubbard; Sarah Altajar; Martin W Roche
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2018-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.