Literature DB >> 24023730

Different factors associated with CTX-M-producing ST131 and non-ST131 Escherichia coli clinical isolates.

Marie-Hélène Nicolas-Chanoine1, Jérôme Robert, Marie Vigan, Cédric Laouénan, Sylvain Brisse, France Mentré, Vincent Jarlier.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To determine factors associated with CTX-M-producing ST131 Escherichia coli which is the worldwide predominant lineage among CTX-M-producing E. coli isolates.
METHODS: Consecutive inpatients with a clinical sample positive for CTX-M-producing E. coli and considered as cases in a previous 8-month (2008-2009) case-control study performed in ten university hospitals in the Paris area were included in the present sub-population study. Patients with a CTX-M-producing ST131 E. coli clinical isolate were compared with those with a CTX-M-producing non-ST131 E. coli clinical isolate with regard to 66 variables. Variables were first compared using univariate logistic regression, then a multivariate analysis using a backward selection with variables with p-value <0.1 in univariate analysis was carried out.
RESULTS: Fifty-five patients with a CTX-M-producing ST131 E. coli clinical isolate were compared to 97 patients with a CTX-producing non-ST131 E. coli clinical isolate. Multivariate analysis showed that only previous residence in long term care facilities (OR=4.4; 95% CI=1.3-14.7) was positively associated with a CTX-M-producing ST131 E. coli isolate. However, it also showed that regular consumption of poultry products (OR=0.2; 95% CI=0.1-0.6), having had at least one device in the preceding 6 months (OR=0.3; 95% CI=0.1-0.7) and stay in ICU (OR=0.2; 95% CI=0.05-0.8) were negatively associated with isolation of CTX-M-producing ST131 E. coli from clinical samples.
CONCLUSIONS: This study provides more insight into the epidemiological features of ST131 and non-ST131 E. coli producing CTX-M enzymes. It shows, for the first time, that isolation of CTX-M-producing ST131 E. coli from clinical samples is not linked to consumption of various foods and confirms that residence in long term care facilities is a predictor of these isolates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24023730      PMCID: PMC3762868          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0072191

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


Introduction

The polyclonal structure of Escherichia coli from clinical and commensal human isolates, and from environmental isolates has clearly been shown by studies recently carried out in the Netherlands (clinical and commensal human isolates and chicken meat isolates), England (clinical isolates) and France (clinical and commensal isolates) on the basis of sequence types (ST) [1]–[5]. However, some E. coli lineages were identified as predominant in the five above cited studies independent of the source of the isolate or the production of extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL). In particular, E. coli ST131 was predominant among the clinical and commensal human isolates, producers of ESBL or not. In contrast, it was not identified in ESBL-producing E. coli isolated from chicken meat in the Netherlands. The absence of clone ST131 has also been confirmed recently in Spain among the E. coli isolates contaminating raw chicken meat [6] although another previous Spanish study had found that 7% of retail chicken samples were contaminated by E. coli ST131 [7]. Vincent et al. also had identified E. coli ST131 from retail chicken samples in Canada but at a significant lower prevalence (0.4%) than in Spain [8]. In contrast, isolates of ST10, comprising ESBL and non-ESBL producers, were frequent both among the clinical and commensal human isolates as well as among the meat isolates [1], [2], [4], [5], [8]. As shown by the Dutch, Canadian and French studies, the recognized avian pathogenic E. coli ST117 was another predominant lineage among the clinical and meat isolates [1], [5], [9]. On the other hand, although CTX-M-15 was shown to be the predominant CTX-M enzyme (46%) among the French clinical isolates, it should be stressed that CTX-M-1 was the only ESBL found in the ST117 clinical isolates in France and was the predominant ESBL found among the ST117 meat isolates in the Netherlands [1], [5]. These reports suggest that epidemiological differences exist between CTX-M-producing strains of ST131 and non-ST131 clones. Therefore, we sought to analyse characteristics associated with CTX-M-producing E. coli ST131 isolated from clinical samples by performing a sub-population analysis of data collected during a case-control study carried out from November 2008 to June 2009 to determine factors independently associated with a clinical sample positive for a CTX-M-producing E. coli isolate in ten hospitals of the Paris area [10]. The analysis of the population structure of CTX-M-producing E. coli and non-ESBL-producing E. coli isolates which was performed in addition to the case-control study, was also used as a basis for the present study [1].

Materials and Methods

Ethics Statement

Written informed consent was obtained from all adult participants and from parents for child participants. The study and the consent procedure were approved by the Ethics Committee of the Groupe Hospitalier Universitaire Nord (Institutional review board N°IRB00006477).

Study Design and Participants

All consecutive inpatients with a clinical sample positive for CTX-M-producing E. coli and considered as cases in a previous 8-month (2008–2009) case-control study performed in ten university hospitals in the Paris area were included in the present sub-population study [10]. Patients with a clinical sample positive for CTX-M-producing ST131 E. coli (n = 55) were compared with those with a clinical sample positive for CTX-M-producing non-ST131 E. coli (n = 97) with regard to 66 characteristics collected during the case-control study, including basic demographic data, patient’s lifestyle (housing, travel abroad, diet, pet, sport practice…), medical history (hospitalisation and invasive devices in the preceding six months, antibiotic in the preceding month, co-morbidity…) and data on the current hospitalisation (hospitalisation wards, invasive devices, antibiotic regimens …). The 97 non-ST131 E. coli isolates displayed 51 ST types of which 38 were displayed by a single isolate and 13 by several isolates: 14 isolates for ST10, 7 for ST167 and ST648, 4 for ST88 and ST410, 3 for ST38, ST93, ST117, ST354, ST405, ST617 and ST1284 and 2 for ST44 [1].

Statistical Analysis

Variables were first compared using univariate logistic regression and odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were estimated. We next used a multivariate analysis using a backward selection with variables with p-value <0.1 in univariate analysis. P-values were assessed at the 0.05 level. All statistical analyses were performed with SAS software, version 9.3 (SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina).

Results

A total of 55 patients with a CTX-M-producing ST131 E. coli clinical isolate were compared to 97 patients with a CTX-M-producing non-ST131 E. coli clinical isolate with regard to the 66 variables studied (Tables 1, 2 and 3). In univariate analysis, patients harbouring E. coli ST131 were more likely than those harbouring non-ST131 E. coli to be aged >65 years (OR = 2.2; 95% CI = 1.1–4.3) and >80 years (OR = 3.8; 95% CI = 1.8–7.7) (Table 1). Among factors focusing on patient’s lifestyle (Table 1), living in collective housing (OR = 3.9; 95% CI = 1.6–9.3) and being functionally dependent before hospitalisation (OR = 4.3; 95% CI = 2.1–8.8) were significantly associated with a ST131 E. coli clinical isolate. On the opposite, consumption of poultry at least twice a week was inversely associated with a ST131 E. coli clinical isolate (OR = 0.3; 95% CI = 0.1–0.7) (Table 1). Patients with a ST131 E. coli clinical isolate were more likely than others to have been in long term care facilities (LTCF) between admission and study inclusion (OR = 2.8; 95% CI = 1.2–6.3), and to have a urinary tract infection during the current hospitalisation (OR = 2.2; 95% CI = 1.0–4.6) (Table 3). On the opposite, patients with a ST131 E. coli clinical isolate were less likely to have surgery in the last month (OR = 0.4; 95% CI = 0.2–0.9) (Table 2), to have been in intensive care unit (ICU) (OR = 0.3; 95% IC = 0.1–0.9), and to have invasive devices within the week prior inclusion (OR = 0.2; 95% CI = 0.1–0.5), notably a urinary catheter (OR = 0.3; 95% CI = 0.1–0.6), and intravascular devices (OR = 0.2; 95% CI = 0.1–0.5) (Table 3).
Table 1

Univariate and multivariate analyses of demographic and lifestyle factors associated with a CTX-M-producing ST131 or non-ST131 E. coli clinical isolate.

Univariate analysisMultivariate analysis
CharacteristicST131 (n = 55)Non-ST131 (n = 97)Odds ratioP valueOdds ratioP value
No. (%)No. (%)(95% CI)(95% CI)
Demographic data
Age (mean ± SD) in years70.2±25.860.5±24.01.0 (1.0–1.0)0.02
Age <15 years3 (5.4)6 (6.2)0.9 (0.2–3.6)0.8
Age ≥ 65 years37 (67.3)47 (48.5)2.2 (1.1–4.3)0.03
Age ≥80 years28 (50.9)21 (21.7)3.8 (1.8–7.7)0.0003
Female41 (74.6)58 (59.8)2.0 (1.0–4.1)0.07
Country of birth outside of Europe15 (27.3)36 (37.1)0.6 (0.3–1.3)0.2
Living in a country outside of Europe1 (1.8)10 (10.3)0.2 (0.02–1.3)0.09
Lifestyle
Collective housing17 (30.9)10 (10.3)3.9 (1.6–9.3)0.002
Individual housing (>2 household members)11 (20.0)33 (34.0)0.5 (0.2–1.1)0.07
Live alone13 (23.6)21 (21.7)1.1 (0.5–2.5)0.8
Functionally dependent before hospitalisation29 (52.7)20 (20.6)4.3 (2.1–8.8)<0.0001
Patients not working43 (78.2)64 (66.0)1.8 (0.9–4.0)0.12
Retired patients37 (67.3)51 (52.6)1.9 (0.9–3.7)0.08
Consumption of:
- ≥7 raw vegetables/week26 (68.4)59 (69.4)1.0 (0.4–2.2)0.9
- poultry ≥ twice a week15 (39.5)56 (66.7)0.3 (0.1–0.7)0.0060.2 (0.1–0.6)0.002
- beef ≥ twice a week21 (55.3)57 (67.9)0.6 (0.3–1.3)0.2
Consumption of raw meat9 (16.4)28 (28.9)0.5 (0.2–1.1)0.09
Community meal29 (52.7)52 (53.6)1.0 (0.5–1.9)0.9
Practice of a sport3 (5.5)8 (8.3)0.6 (0.2–2.5)0.5
Pets or livestock5 (9.1)14 (14.4)0.6 (0.2–1.7)0.3
Travel abroad in the preceding 6 months3 (5.5)14 (14.4)0.3 (0.09–1.2)0.1
Table 2

Univariate and multivariate analyses of medical history-related factors associated with a CTX-M-producing ST131 or non-ST131 E. coli clinical isolate.

Univariate analysisMultivariate analysis
CharacteristicST131 (n = 55)Non-ST131 (n = 97)Odds ratioP valueOdds ratioP value
No. (%)No. (%)(95% CI)(95% CI)
In the preceding 6 months
- hospitalised34 (61.8)63 (65.0)0.9 (0.4–1.7)0.7
- hospitalised ≥10 days19 (34.6)42 (43.3)0.7 (0.3–1.4)0.3
- hospitalised <10 days15 (27.3)21 (21.7)1.4 (0.6–2.9)0.4
- hospitalised outside of France1 (1.8)7 (7.2)0.2 (0.03–2.0)0.2
- at least one invasive device30 (54.6)66 (68.0)0.6 (0.3–1.1)0.10.3 (0.1–0.7)0.01
• urine drainage16 (29.6)31 (32.3)0.9 (0.4–1.8)0.7
• mechanical ventilation3 (5.6)10 (10.4)0.5 (0.1–1.9)0.3
• intravascular devices29 (53.7)62 (64.6)0.6 (0.3–1.3)0.2
• colonoscopy, endoscopy9 (17.3)28 (30.4)0.5 (0.2–1.1)0.09
Surgery during the last month10 (18.2)34 (35.4)0.4 (0.2–0.9)0.03
Prothesis within the last year2 (3.7)8 (8.3)0.4 (0.09–2.1)0.3
Antibiotic in the month preceding hospitalisation16 (29.1)37 (38.1)0.7 (0.3–1.4)0.3
- cotrimoxazole2 (3.6)8 (8.3)0.4 (0.09–2.1)0.3
- fluoroquinolones4 (7.3)7 (7.2)1.0 (0.3–3.6)1.0
- extended spectrum cephalosporins4 (7.3)7 (7.2)1.0 (0.3–3.6)1.0
- penicillins6 (10.9)11 (11.3)1.0 (0.3–2.7)0.9
- ≥5 days9 (16.4)22 (22.7)0.7 (0.3–1.6)0.4
Nursing or physiotherapy before hospitalisation9 (16.4)17 (17.5)0.9 (0.4–2.2)0.9
At least one co-morbidity33 (60.0)57 (58.8)1.1 (0.5–2.1)0.9
- recurrent urinary tract or chronic skin infections18 (32.7)21 (21.7)1.8 (0.8–3.7)0.1
- obstructive bronchial pulmonary disease2 (3.6)5 (5.2)0.7 (0.1–3.7)0.7
- cancer10 (18.2)27 (27.8)0.6 (0.3–1.3)0.2
- diabetes12 (21.8)22 (22.7)0.9 (0.4–2.1)0.9
Table 3

Univariate and multivariate analyses of current hospitalisation-related factors associated with a CTX-M-producing ST131 or non-ST131 E. coli clinical isolate.

Univariate analysisMultivariate analysis
CharacteristicST131 (n = 55)Non-ST131 (n = 97)Odds ratioP valueOdds ratioP value
No. (%)No. (%)(95% CI)(95% CI)
Transferred from another hospital32 (25.5)18 (18.6)1.5 (0.7–3.3)0.3
Mc Cabe score 211 (21.6)23 (27.1)0.7 (0.3–1.7)0.5
Immunocompromised15 (27.3)36 (37.1)0.6 (0.3–1.3)0.2
Between admission and inclusion
- Ward
• ICU4 (7.3)27 (27.8)0.3 (0.1–0.9)0.2 (0.05–0.8)0.02
• LTCF21 (38.2)14 (14.4)2.8 (1.2–6.3)0.0009* 4.4 (1.3–14.7)0.02
• Others30 (54.5)56 (57.8)11
- Invasive device during the last week33 (60.0)84 (86.6)0.2 (0.1–0.5)0.0003
• urine drainage11 (20.0)45 (46.4)0.3 (0.1–0.6)0.002
• mechanical ventilation5 (10.6)19 (20.0)0.5 (0.2–1.4)0.2
• intravascular devices31 (56.4)81 (84.4)0.2 (0.1–0.5)0.0003
- Antibiotic receipt24 (43.6)57 (58.8)0.5 (0.3–1.1)0.07
• cotrimoxazole3 (5.5)6 (6.2)0.9 (0.2–3.6)0.9
• fluoroquinolones7 (12.7)10 (10.3)1.3 (0.5–3.5)0.7
• penicillins10 (18.2)26 (26.8)0.6 (0.3–1.4)0.2
• extended spectrum cephalosporins6 (10.9)12 (12.4)0.9 (0.3–2.5)0.8
• aminoglycosides2 (3.6)11 (11.3)0.3 (0.06–1.4)0.1
• carbapenems1 (1.8)8 (8.3)0.2 (0.03–1.7)0.14
• ≥5 days13 (23.6)35 (36.1)0.5 (0.3–1.2)0.1
Specimen and infection data
- specimen sampled after 48 h of hospitalisation35 (63.6)51 (52.6)1.6 (0.8–3.1)0.2
- specimen sampled after >10 days of hospitalisation21 (38.2)35 (36.1)1.1 (0.6–2.2)0.8
- urine sample39 (70.9)58 (59.8)1.6 (0.8–3.3)0.2
- urinary tract infection42 (76.4)58 (59.8)2.2 (1.0–4.6)0.04

ICU; intensive care unit, LCTF; long term care facility,

P value resulting from the analysis of the variable “ward” classified into 3 categories, ie ICU, LCTF and others.

ICU; intensive care unit, LCTF; long term care facility, P value resulting from the analysis of the variable “ward” classified into 3 categories, ie ICU, LCTF and others. In multivariate analysis, only previous residence in LTCF (OR = 4.4; 95% CI = 1.3–14.7) remained positively associated with E. coli ST131 (Table 3). However, consumption of poultry at least twice a week (OR = 0.2; 95% CI = 0.1–0.6) (Table 1), having had at least one device in the preceding 6 months (OR = 0.3; 95% CI = 0.1–0.7) (Table 2), and hospitalisation in ICU (OR = 0.2; 95% CI = 0.05–0.8) (Table 3) were, independently, inversely associated with isolation of E. coli ST131 from clinical samples.

Discussion

E. coli ST131 has been shown to be a worldwide predominant clone among extra-intestinal pathogenic isolates but also among the human commensal flora [2], [4], [10]–[12]. Interestingly, it was found to be almost the only lineage among clinical isolates of group B2 E. coli that produced CTX-M enzymes [1]. It displayed a higher ability to colonize the digestive tract and a lower level of virulence in various animal models in comparison with reference group B2 urinary pathogenic E. coli strains (CFT053, J536 and HT7) [13]–[15]. Therefore, better knowing the epidemiology of clone ST131, which appears to be a very peculiar group B2 lineage, especially among isolates producing CTX-M enzymes, is of interest due to its worldwide success. The present prospective study investigated which factors among 66 studied were associated with those of ST131 E. coli clinical isolates that produce CTX-M enzymes. Among the various types of food products analysed, it was found, for the first time, that consumption of poultry meat at least twice a week is a factor inversely associated with isolation of a CTX-M-producing ST131 E. coli clinical isolate among the CTX-M-producing E. coli clinical isolates. In other words, it means that consumption of poultry meat was associated with isolation of CTX-M-producing E. coli that did not belong to ST131. This finding is of importance with regard to the debate on the potential food-borne source of E. coli ST131, notably those producing CTX-M enzymes [8], [16]. Poultry meat was suggested as a source of E. coli ST131 on the basis of two studies published in 2010 because E. coli ST131 has been isolated from poultry meat samples [7], [8]. The most recent studies conducted in the Netherlands and in Spain challenged this hypothesis as they failed to isolate CTX-M-producing E coli ST131 from chicken meat samples [3], [6]. Overall, the results of our study are in accordance with the fact that E. coli ST131 has not been identified among ESBL-producing E. coli isolated from retail chicken meat on the contrary to other lineage [3], [5], [6], [17]. Although, there are very few studies on the population structure of ESBL-producing E. coli isolates from poultry meat, it is noteworthy that, among the CTX-M-producing non ST131 E. coli clinical isolates, some dominant clonal groups (ST10, ST117 and ST354) are commonly identified from chicken meat [3], [8], [18]. Interestingly, ST167 and ST648, the two highest dominant clonal groups after ST10 among the CTX-M-producing non-ST131 E. coli clinical isolates had been identified among ESBL-producing E. coli isolates from Spanish poultry farms and from birds of prey from Germany and Mongolia [19], [20]. In summary, the dominant non-ST131 clonal groups in our population are clonal groups commonly identified in avian populations. The only factor positively associated with isolation of CTX-M-producing E. coli ST131 from clinical samples was residence in LTCF before inclusion in the study. Rooney et al. showed that a high proportion of people living in such settings in England had digestive tract colonization with ESBL-producing E. coli ST131 [21]. Of note, the first identification of CTX-M-15-producing E. coli ST131 in France was achieved from patients in LTCFs [22], [23]. More recently, Banerjee et al. conducted a retrospective study in all healthcare settings in Olmsted County (Minnesota) and found that LTCF residence was a factor independently associated with E. coli ST131 [24]. Overall, three studies conducted in three different developed countries have found a link between LTCF residence and E. coli ST131. This might suggest that human cross-transmission is a key factor in the dissemination of CTX-M-producing E. coli ST131. Although the proportion of hospital-acquired (isolation after 48 h of hospitalisation) CTX-M-producing ST131 and non-ST131 E. coli isolates was high and not significantly different (63.6% vs 56.2%: P = 0.2) and the patients infected by either E. coli ST131 or E. coli non-ST131 did not differ with regard to Mac Cabe score, we found that presence of invasive devices in the preceding six months and stay in ICU before study inclusion were inversely associated with isolation of CTX-M-producing E. coli ST131. It suggests that isolation of CTX-M-producing non-ST131 E. coli from clinical samples is more likely to be healthcare-related. Such results seem to be in contradiction with those obtained by Banerjee et al. [24]. Indeed, they found that E. coli ST131 is linked to healthcare and hospital acquisition. However, we noted that this link was identified by Banerjee et al in the univariate and not in the multivariate analysis that they carried out. Finally, we were not able to link travel abroad, notably in Africa and India, to isolation of CTX-M-producing E. coli ST131 from clinical samples probably because of the lack of power regarding this association in our study [25]. In conclusion, this study provides more insight into the epidemiological features of ST131 and non-ST131 E. coli producing CTX-M enzymes. It shows, for the first time, that isolation of CTX-M-producing E. coli ST131 from clinical samples was not linked to consumption of specific foods and confirms that residence in long term care facilities is linked to these isolates. Further studies are required to know whether our results are also relevant for E. coli ST131 not producing CTX-M enzymes.
  25 in total

1.  Comparison of ESBL contamination in organic and conventional retail chicken meat.

Authors:  James Cohen Stuart; Thijs van den Munckhof; Guido Voets; Jelle Scharringa; Ad Fluit; Maurine Leverstein-Van Hall
Journal:  Int J Food Microbiol       Date:  2012-01-03       Impact factor: 5.277

2.  Colonization of returning travelers with CTX-M-producing Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Gisele Peirano; Kevin B Laupland; Daniel B Gregson; Johann D D Pitout
Journal:  J Travel Med       Date:  2011-08-15       Impact factor: 8.490

3.  Recent emergence of clonal group O25b:K1:H4-B2-ST131 ibeA strains among Escherichia coli poultry isolates, including CTX-M-9-producing strains, and comparison with clinical human isolates.

Authors:  Azucena Mora; Alexandra Herrera; Rosalia Mamani; Cecilia López; María Pilar Alonso; Jesús E Blanco; Miguel Blanco; Ghizlane Dahbi; Fernando García-Garrote; Julia María Pita; Amparo Coira; María Isabel Bernárdez; Jorge Blanco
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2010-09-03       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Cephalosporin resistance mechanisms in Escherichia coli isolated from raw chicken imported into the UK.

Authors:  Hiran Dhanji; Niamh M Murphy; Michel Doumith; Sema Durmus; Susanne Surman Lee; Russell Hope; Neil Woodford; David M Livermore
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2010-10-01       Impact factor: 5.790

Review 5.  Escherichia coli O25b-ST131: a pandemic, multiresistant, community-associated strain.

Authors:  Benjamin A Rogers; Hanna E Sidjabat; David L Paterson
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2010-11-16       Impact factor: 5.790

6.  Population structure, virulence potential and antibiotic susceptibility of uropathogenic Escherichia coli from Northwest England.

Authors:  Tarek M Gibreel; Andrew R Dodgson; John Cheesbrough; Andrew J Fox; Frederick J Bolton; Mathew Upton
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2011-10-25       Impact factor: 5.790

7.  Nursing homes as a reservoir of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-producing ciprofloxacin-resistant Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Paul J Rooney; Maureen C O'Leary; Anne C Loughrey; Mark McCalmont; Brian Smyth; Philip Donaghy; Motasim Badri; Neil Woodford; Edi Karisik; David M Livermore
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2009-06-23       Impact factor: 5.790

8.  Patient's origin and lifestyle associated with CTX-M-producing Escherichia coli: a case-control-control study.

Authors:  Marie-Hélène Nicolas-Chanoine; Vincent Jarlier; Jérôme Robert; Guillaume Arlet; Laurence Drieux; Véronique Leflon-Guibout; Cédric Laouénan; Béatrice Larroque; Valérie Caro; France Mentré
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-01-27       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Extended-spectrum β-lactamase genes of Escherichia coli in chicken meat and humans, The Netherlands.

Authors:  Ilse Overdevest; Ina Willemsen; Martine Rijnsburger; Andrew Eustace; Li Xu; Peter Hawkey; Max Heck; Paul Savelkoul; Christina Vandenbroucke-Grauls; Kim van der Zwaluw; Xander Huijsdens; Jan Kluytmans
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 6.883

10.  Food reservoir for Escherichia coli causing urinary tract infections.

Authors:  Caroline Vincent; Patrick Boerlin; Danielle Daignault; Charles M Dozois; Lucie Dutil; Chrissi Galanakis; Richard J Reid-Smith; Pierre Paul Tellier; Patricia A Tellis; Kim Ziebell; Amee R Manges
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 6.883

View more
  11 in total

Review 1.  Escherichia coli ST131, an intriguing clonal group.

Authors:  Marie-Hélène Nicolas-Chanoine; Xavier Bertrand; Jean-Yves Madec
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 26.132

Review 2.  A new clone sweeps clean: the enigmatic emergence of Escherichia coli sequence type 131.

Authors:  Ritu Banerjee; James R Johnson
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2014-05-27       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Independent Host Factors and Bacterial Genetic Determinants of the Emergence and Dominance of Escherichia coli Sequence Type 131 CTX-M-27 in a Community Pediatric Cohort Study.

Authors:  André Birgy; Corinne Levy; Marie-Hélène Nicolas-Chanoine; Aurélie Cointe; Claire A Hobson; Mélanie Magnan; Stéphane Bechet; Philippe Bidet; Robert Cohen; Stéphane Bonacorsi
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2019-06-24       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Genomic and Phenotypic Analysis of an ESBL-Producing E. coli ST1159 Clonal Lineage From Wild Birds in Mongolia.

Authors:  Peter Schierack; Stefan E Heiden; Muhammad Moman Khan; Lena Nikolaus; Rafal Kolenda; Michael Stubbe; Davaa Lkhagvasuren; Stefan Rödiger; Sebastian Guenther; Katharina Schaufler
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2020-07-21       Impact factor: 5.640

5.  Genotypic and phenotypic profiles of Escherichia coli isolates belonging to clinical sequence type 131 (ST131), clinical non-ST131, and fecal non-ST131 lineages from India.

Authors:  Arif Hussain; Amit Ranjan; Nishant Nandanwar; Anshu Babbar; Savita Jadhav; Niyaz Ahmed
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2014-09-22       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  Long-Term Care Facilities Are Reservoirs for Antimicrobial-Resistant Sequence Type 131 Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Mary J Burgess; James R Johnson; Stephen B Porter; Brian Johnston; Connie Clabots; Brian D Lahr; James R Uhl; Ritu Banerjee
Journal:  Open Forum Infect Dis       Date:  2015-02-17       Impact factor: 3.835

7.  Epidemiology of CTX-M-type extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-producing nosocomial -Escherichia coli infection in China.

Authors:  Huiqing Shi; Fengjun Sun; Jianhong Chen; Qianyi Ou; Wei Feng; Xiaolan Yong; Peiyuan Xia
Journal:  Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob       Date:  2015-01-16       Impact factor: 3.944

Review 8.  Epidemic potential of Escherichia coli ST131 and Klebsiella pneumoniae ST258: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  M J D Dautzenberg; M R Haverkate; M J M Bonten; M C J Bootsma
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-03-17       Impact factor: 2.692

9.  Clonal diversity, virulence genes content and subclone status of Escherichia coli sequence type 131: comparative analysis of E. coli ST131 and non-ST131 isolates from Iran.

Authors:  Zoya Hojabri; Narges Darabi; Maedeh Arab; Fereshteh Saffari; Omid Pajand
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2019-05-30       Impact factor: 3.605

10.  Genomic surveillance of Escherichia coli ST131 identifies local expansion and serial replacement of subclones.

Authors:  Catherine Ludden; Arun Gonzales Decano; Dorota Jamrozy; Derek Pickard; Dearbhaile Morris; Julian Parkhill; Sharon J Peacock; Martin Cormican; Tim Downing
Journal:  Microb Genom       Date:  2020-03-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.