Literature DB >> 24022791

Quantifying the reliability of image replication studies: the image intraclass correlation coefficient (I2C2).

H Shou, A Eloyan, S Lee, V Zipunnikov, A N Crainiceanu, N B Nebel, B Caffo, M A Lindquist, C M Crainiceanu.   

Abstract

This article proposes the image intraclass correlation (I2C2) coefficient as a global measure of reliability for imaging studies. The I2C2 generalizes the classic intraclass correlation (ICC) coefficient to the case when the data of interest are images, thereby providing a measure that is both intuitive and convenient. Drawing a connection with classical measurement error models for replication experiments, the I2C2 can be computed quickly, even in high-dimensional imaging studies. A nonparametric bootstrap procedure is introduced to quantify the variability of the I2C2 estimator. Furthermore, a Monte Carlo permutation is utilized to test reproducibility versus a zero I2C2, representing complete lack of reproducibility. Methodologies are applied to three replication studies arising from different brain imaging modalities and settings: regional analysis of volumes in normalized space imaging for characterizing brain morphology, seed-voxel brain activation maps based on resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), and fractional anisotropy in an area surrounding the corpus callosum via diffusion tensor imaging. Notably, resting-state fMRI brain activation maps are found to have low reliability, ranging from .2 to .4. Software and data are available to provide easy access to the proposed methods.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24022791      PMCID: PMC3869880          DOI: 10.3758/s13415-013-0196-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci        ISSN: 1530-7026            Impact factor:   3.282


  34 in total

1.  The quantitative evaluation of functional neuroimaging experiments: the NPAIRS data analysis framework.

Authors:  Stephen C Strother; Jon Anderson; Lars Kai Hansen; Ulrik Kjems; Rafal Kustra; John Sidtis; Sally Frutiger; Suraj Muley; Stephen LaConte; David Rottenberg
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  Negative edges and soft thresholding in complex network analysis of resting state functional connectivity data.

Authors:  Adam J Schwarz; John McGonigle
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2010-12-29       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  The human brain is intrinsically organized into dynamic, anticorrelated functional networks.

Authors:  Michael D Fox; Abraham Z Snyder; Justin L Vincent; Maurizio Corbetta; David C Van Essen; Marcus E Raichle
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-06-23       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Longitudinal changes in diffusion tensor-based quantitative MRI in multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  D M Harrison; B S Caffo; N Shiee; J A D Farrell; P-L Bazin; S K Farrell; J N Ratchford; P A Calabresi; D S Reich
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2011-01-11       Impact factor: 9.910

5.  MULTILEVEL FUNCTIONAL PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS.

Authors:  Chong-Zhi Di; Ciprian M Crainiceanu; Brian S Caffo; Naresh M Punjabi
Journal:  Ann Appl Stat       Date:  2009-03-01       Impact factor: 2.083

6.  Automated vs. conventional tractography in multiple sclerosis: variability and correlation with disability.

Authors:  Daniel S Reich; Arzu Ozturk; Peter A Calabresi; Susumu Mori
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2009-11-26       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  Group independent component analysis reveals consistent resting-state networks across multiple sessions.

Authors:  Sharon Chen; Thomas J Ross; Wang Zhan; Carol S Myers; Keh-Shih Chuang; Stephen J Heishman; Elliot A Stein; Yihong Yang
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2008-08-18       Impact factor: 3.252

8.  The oscillating brain: complex and reliable.

Authors:  Xi-Nian Zuo; Adriana Di Martino; Clare Kelly; Zarrar E Shehzad; Dylan G Gee; Donald F Klein; F Xavier Castellanos; Bharat B Biswal; Michael P Milham
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2009-09-24       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  Complex organization of human primary motor cortex: a high-resolution fMRI study.

Authors:  Jeffrey D Meier; Tyson N Aflalo; Sabine Kastner; Michael S A Graziano
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-08-06       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Bootstrap-based inference on the difference in the means of two correlated functional processes.

Authors:  Ciprian M Crainiceanu; Ana-Maria Staicu; Shubankar Ray; Naresh Punjabi
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2012-08-01       Impact factor: 2.373

View more
  37 in total

1.  The Healthy Brain Network Serial Scanning Initiative: a resource for evaluating inter-individual differences and their reliabilities across scan conditions and sessions.

Authors:  David O'Connor; Natan Vega Potler; Meagan Kovacs; Ting Xu; Lei Ai; John Pellman; Tamara Vanderwal; Lucas C Parra; Samantha Cohen; Satrajit Ghosh; Jasmine Escalera; Natalie Grant-Villegas; Yael Osman; Anastasia Bui; R Cameron Craddock; Michael P Milham
Journal:  Gigascience       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 6.524

2.  A longitudinal human phantom reliability study of multi-center T1-weighted, DTI, and resting state fMRI data.

Authors:  Colin Hawco; Joseph D Viviano; Sofia Chavez; Erin W Dickie; Navona Calarco; Peter Kochunov; Miklos Argyelan; Jessica A Turner; Anil K Malhotra; Robert W Buchanan; Aristotle N Voineskos
Journal:  Psychiatry Res Neuroimaging       Date:  2018-06-09       Impact factor: 2.376

3.  Evaluating fMRI-Based Estimation of Eye Gaze During Naturalistic Viewing.

Authors:  Jake Son; Lei Ai; Ryan Lim; Ting Xu; Stanley Colcombe; Alexandre Rosa Franco; Jessica Cloud; Stephen LaConte; Jonathan Lisinski; Arno Klein; R Cameron Craddock; Michael Milham
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2020-03-14       Impact factor: 5.357

4.  Multivariate approaches improve the reliability and validity of functional connectivity and prediction of individual behaviors.

Authors:  Kwangsun Yoo; Monica D Rosenberg; Stephanie Noble; Dustin Scheinost; R Todd Constable; Marvin M Chun
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2019-04-27       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Comparing test-retest reliability of dynamic functional connectivity methods.

Authors:  Ann S Choe; Mary Beth Nebel; Anita D Barber; Jessica R Cohen; Yuting Xu; James J Pekar; Brian Caffo; Martin A Lindquist
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2017-07-05       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  Estimating a graphical intra-class correlation coefficient (GICC) using multivariate probit-linear mixed models.

Authors:  Chen Yue; Shaojie Chen; Haris I Sair; Raag Airan; Brian S Caffo
Journal:  Comput Stat Data Anal       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 1.681

7.  Intraclass correlation: Improved modeling approaches and applications for neuroimaging.

Authors:  Gang Chen; Paul A Taylor; Simone P Haller; Katharina Kircanski; Joel Stoddard; Daniel S Pine; Ellen Leibenluft; Melissa A Brotman; Robert W Cox
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2017-12-07       Impact factor: 5.038

8.  Improved estimation of subject-level functional connectivity using full and partial correlation with empirical Bayes shrinkage.

Authors:  Amanda F Mejia; Mary Beth Nebel; Anita D Barber; Ann S Choe; James J Pekar; Brian S Caffo; Martin A Lindquist
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2018-02-14       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  Shrinkage prediction of seed-voxel brain connectivity using resting state fMRI.

Authors:  Haochang Shou; Ani Eloyan; Mary Beth Nebel; Amanda Mejia; James J Pekar; Stewart Mostofsky; Brian Caffo; Martin A Lindquist; Ciprian M Crainiceanu
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2014-05-29       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  Reproducibility and reliability of anti-3-[¹⁸F]FACBC uptake measurements in background structures and malignant lesions on follow-up PET-CT in prostate carcinoma: an exploratory analysis.

Authors:  Oluwaseun A Odewole; Oyeladun A Oyenuga; Funmilayo Tade; Bital Savir-Baruch; Peter T Nieh; Viraj Master; Zhengjia Chen; Xiaojing Wang; Ashesh B Jani; Leah M Bellamy; Raghuveer K Halkar; Mark M Goodman; David M Schuster
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 3.488

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.