PURPOSE: In this study, the authors examined diagnostic and intervention services for children identified with hearing loss (HL) after the newborn period. METHOD: The authors compared ages at service delivery and length of delays between service delivery steps for 57 later-identified children with HL and 193 children who referred for assessment from the newborn hearing screen (NHS). For only later-identified children, regression models were used to investigate relationships among predictor variables and dependent variables related to service delivery. RESULTS: Children who referred from the NHS received follow-up services at younger ages than later-identified children. Later-identified children had significantly longer delays from HL confirmation to entry into early intervention, compared to children who referred from the NHS. For later-identified children, degree of HL predicted ages at follow-up clinical services. Children with more severe HL received services at younger ages compared to children with milder HL. Gender predicted the length of the delay from confirmation to entry into early intervention, with girls demonstrating shorter delays. CONCLUSIONS: The current results lend support to the need for ongoing hearing monitoring programs after the neonatal period, particularly when children enter early intervention programs because of language/developmental delays.
PURPOSE: In this study, the authors examined diagnostic and intervention services for children identified with hearing loss (HL) after the newborn period. METHOD: The authors compared ages at service delivery and length of delays between service delivery steps for 57 later-identified children with HL and 193 children who referred for assessment from the newborn hearing screen (NHS). For only later-identified children, regression models were used to investigate relationships among predictor variables and dependent variables related to service delivery. RESULTS:Children who referred from the NHS received follow-up services at younger ages than later-identified children. Later-identified children had significantly longer delays from HL confirmation to entry into early intervention, compared to children who referred from the NHS. For later-identified children, degree of HL predicted ages at follow-up clinical services. Children with more severe HL received services at younger ages compared to children with milder HL. Gender predicted the length of the delay from confirmation to entry into early intervention, with girls demonstrating shorter delays. CONCLUSIONS: The current results lend support to the need for ongoing hearing monitoring programs after the neonatal period, particularly when children enter early intervention programs because of language/developmental delays.
Authors: J Bamford; H Fortnum; K Bristow; J Smith; G Vamvakas; L Davies; R Taylor; P Watkin; S Fonseca; A Davis; S Hind Journal: Health Technol Assess Date: 2007-08 Impact factor: 4.014
Authors: Colin R Kennedy; Donna C McCann; Michael J Campbell; Catherine M Law; Mark Mullee; Stavros Petrou; Peter Watkin; Sarah Worsfold; Ho Ming Yuen; Jim Stevenson Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2006-05-18 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Ryan W McCreery; Elizabeth A Walker; Derek J Stiles; Meredith Spratford; Jacob J Oleson; Dawna E Lewis Journal: Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch Date: 2020-01-08 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: Elizabeth A Walker; Lenore Holte; Ryan W McCreery; Meredith Spratford; Thomas Page; Mary Pat Moeller Journal: J Speech Lang Hear Res Date: 2015-10 Impact factor: 2.297
Authors: Ryan W McCreery; Elizabeth A Walker; Meredith Spratford; Ruth Bentler; Lenore Holte; Patricia Roush; Jacob Oleson; John Van Buren; Mary Pat Moeller Journal: Ear Hear Date: 2015 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 3.570
Authors: Elizabeth A Walker; Meredith Spratford; Sophie E Ambrose; Lenore Holte; Jacob Oleson Journal: Am J Audiol Date: 2017-03-01 Impact factor: 1.493