Literature DB >> 24018535

Dose-finding design using mixed-effect proportional odds model for longitudinal graded toxicity data in phase I oncology clinical trials.

Adélaïde Doussau1, Rodolphe Thiébaut, Xavier Paoletti.   

Abstract

Phase I oncology clinical trials are designed to identify the optimal dose that will be recommended for phase II trials. This dose is typically defined as the dose associated with a certain probability of severe toxicity during the first cycle of treatment, although toxicity is repeatedly measured over cycles on an ordinal scale. We propose a new adaptive dose-finding design using longitudinal measurements of ordinal toxic adverse events, with proportional odds mixed-effect models. Likelihood-based inference is implemented. The optimal dose is then the dose producing a target rate of severe toxicity per cycle. This model can also be used to identify cumulative or late toxicities. The performances of this approach were compared with those of the continual reassessment method in a simulation study. Operating characteristics were evaluated in terms of correct identification of the target dose, distribution of the doses allocated and power to detect trends in the risk of toxicities over time. This approach was also used to reanalyse data from a phase I oncology trial. Use of a proportional odds mixed-effect model appears to be feasible in phase I dose-finding trials, increases the ability of selecting the correct dose and provides a tool to detect cumulative effects.
Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  continual reassessment method; dose finding; longitudinal; ordinal; proportional odds

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24018535     DOI: 10.1002/sim.5960

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  10 in total

Review 1.  Statistical controversies in clinical research: requiem for the 3 + 3 design for phase I trials.

Authors:  X Paoletti; M Ezzalfani; C Le Tourneau
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2015-06-18       Impact factor: 32.976

2.  Dose-finding designs for cumulative toxicities using multiple constraints.

Authors:  Shing M Lee; Moreno Ursino; Ying Kuen Cheung; Sarah Zohar
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2019-01-01       Impact factor: 5.899

3.  Adaptive Phase I clinical trial design using Markov models for conditional probability of toxicity.

Authors:  Laura L Fernandes; Jeremy M G Taylor; Susan Murray
Journal:  J Biopharm Stat       Date:  2015-06-22       Impact factor: 1.051

Review 4.  Challenges, opportunities, and innovative statistical designs for precision oncology trials.

Authors:  Jun Yin; Shihao Shen; Qian Shi
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2022-09

5.  Multivariate Markov models for the conditional probability of toxicity in phase II trials.

Authors:  Laura L Fernandes; Susan Murray; Jeremy M G Taylor
Journal:  Biom J       Date:  2015-08-07       Impact factor: 2.207

Review 6.  Early phase clinical trials to identify optimal dosing and safety.

Authors:  Natalie Cook; Aaron R Hansen; Lillian L Siu; Albiruni R Abdul Razak
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2014-08-14       Impact factor: 6.603

Review 7.  Innovations for phase I dose-finding designs in pediatric oncology clinical trials.

Authors:  Adelaide Doussau; Birgit Geoerger; Irene Jiménez; Xavier Paoletti
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2016-01-26       Impact factor: 2.226

8.  Challenges and Innovations in Phase I Dose-Finding Designs for Molecularly Targeted Agents and Cancer Immunotherapies.

Authors:  Jun Yin; Shihao Shen
Journal:  J Biom Biostat       Date:  2016-11-14

9.  Proportional odds assumption for modeling longitudinal ordinal multiple toxicity outcomes in dose finding studies of targeted agents: A pooled analysis of 54 studies.

Authors:  Damien Drubay; Laurence Collette; Xavier Paoletti
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials Commun       Date:  2020-01-25

10.  Pharmacogenetics-Guided Phase I Study of Capecitabine on an Intermittent Schedule in Patients with Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumours.

Authors:  Ross Andrew Soo; Nicholas Syn; Soo-Chin Lee; Lingzhi Wang; Xn-Yii Lim; Marie Loh; Sing-Huang Tan; Ying-Kiat Zee; Andrea Li-Ann Wong; Benjamin Chuah; Daniel Chan; Siew-Eng Lim; Boon-Cher Goh; Richie Soong; Wei-Peng Yong
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-06-14       Impact factor: 4.379

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.