Literature DB >> 24018019

Robotic and laparoscopic radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: long-term oncologic outcomes.

Devon C Snow-Lisy1, Steven C Campbell, Inderbir S Gill, Adrian V Hernandez, Amr Fergany, Jihad Kaouk, Georges-Pascal Haber.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Extended oncologic outcomes after minimally invasive cystectomy have not been previously reported.
OBJECTIVE: To report outcomes of robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) and laparoscopic radical cystectomy (LRC) for bladder cancer (BCa) at up to 12-yr follow-up. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: All 121 patients undergoing RARC or LRC for BCa between December 1999 and September 2008 at a tertiary referral center were retrospectively evaluated from a prospectively maintained database. INTERVENTION: RARC or LRC. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Primary end points were overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and recurrence-free survival (RFS) calculated using Kaplan-Meier curves. Secondary end points were survival analysis by number of lymph nodes (LNs) and type of procedure. Surgical outcomes, including complications, were analyzed. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Most tumors were muscle invasive (≥ pT2; n=81; 67%) urothelial carcinomas (n=102; 84%). Extended LN dissection was performed in 98 patients (81%), with a median of 14 nodes removed (interquartile range [IQR]: 8-18). Twenty-four patients (20%) had node-positive disease (N1: 10 [8%]; N2: 14 [12%]). Eight patients (6.6%) had positive soft tissue margins. Median follow-up was 5.5 yr (mean: 5.9; IQR: 4.2-8.2; range: 0.13-12.1). At last follow-up, 58 patients (48%) had no evidence of disease, 3 (2%) were alive with recurrence, 59 (49%) had died, and status was unknown in 1. Twenty-eight patients (23%) died from cancer-specific causes, 20 (17%) from unrelated causes, and 11 (9%) from unknown causes. The 10-yr actuarial OS, CSS, and RFS rates were 35%, 63%, and 54%, respectively. At last follow-up, OS for pT0, pTis/a, pT1, pT2, and pT3 versus pT4 was 67%, 73%, 53%, 50%, and 16% versus 0%, respectively (p=0.02). At last follow-up, CSS for pT0, pTis/a, pT1, pT2, and pT3 versus pT4 was 100%, 91%, 74%, 77%, and 56% versus 0%, respectively (p=0.03).
CONCLUSIONS: The longest oncologic outcomes following RARC and LRC for BCa reported demonstrates results similar to those reported for open RC. Continued analysis and direct randomized comparison between techniques is necessary.
Copyright © 2013. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bladder neoplasm; Laparoscopy; Minimally invasive; Robotic assisted; Urinary diversion

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24018019     DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.08.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Urol        ISSN: 0302-2838            Impact factor:   20.096


  39 in total

Review 1.  The Role of Robotics in the Invasive Management of Bladder Cancer.

Authors:  Pramit Khetrapal; Wei Shen Tan; Benjamin Lamb; Melanie Tan; Hilary Baker; James Thompson; Ashwin Sridhar; John D Kelly; Tim Briggs
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 3.092

2.  Robotic Intracorporeal Continent Cutaneous Urinary Diversion: Primary Description.

Authors:  Alvin C Goh; Monty A Aghazadeh; Ross E Krasnow; Alexander W Pastuszak; Julie N Stewart; Brian J Miles
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2015-02-05       Impact factor: 2.942

3.  Peri-operative efficacy and long-term survival benefit of robotic-assisted radical cystectomy in septuagenarian patients compared with younger patients: a nationwide multi-institutional study in Japan.

Authors:  Hideto Iwamoto; Shuichi Morizane; Takuya Koie; Ryoichi Shiroki; Mutsushi Kawakita; Tatsuo Gondo; Kazumasa Matsumoto; Tomonori Habuchi; Hiroshi Sunada; Yusuke Endo; Hisashi Noma; Atsushi Takenaka; Hiroomi Kanayama
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2019-05-23       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 4.  Intracorporeal versus extracorporeal urinary diversion following robot-assisted radical cystectomy: a meta-analysis, cumulative analysis, and systematic review.

Authors:  Karthik Tanneru; Seyed Behzad Jazayeri; Jatinder Kumar; Muhammad Umar Alam; Daniel Norez; Sabine Nguyen; Soroush Bazargani; Hariharan Palayapalayam Ganapathi; Mark Bandyk; Robert Marino; Shahriar Koochekpour; Shiva Gautam; K C Balaji; Joseph Costa
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2020-11-22

5.  Are we really seeking for equivalence?-The virtue of the robot is in technology.

Authors:  Aldo Brassetti; Riccardo Mastroianni; Giuseppe Simone
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2019-12

6.  Surgical and pathological outcomes of robotic-assisted radical cystectomy for bladder cancer in the community setting.

Authors:  E M DiLizia; F Sadeghi
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2017-08-23

7.  The morbidity of laparoscopic radical cystectomy: analysis of postoperative complications in a multicenter cohort by the European Association of Urology (EAU)-Section of Uro-Technology.

Authors:  Simone Albisinni; Marco Oderda; Laurent Fossion; Virginia Varca; Jens Rassweiler; Xavier Cathelineau; Piotr Chlosta; Alexandre De la Taille; Franco Gaboardi; Thierry Piechaud; Peter Rimington; Laurent Salomon; Rafael Sanchez-Salas; Jens-Uwe Stolzenburg; Dogu Teber; Roland Van Velthoven
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-07-02       Impact factor: 4.226

8.  Predictors of Recurrence, and Progression-Free and Overall Survival following Open versus Robotic Radical Cystectomy: Analysis from the RAZOR Trial with a 3-Year Followup.

Authors:  Vivek Venkatramani; Isildinha M Reis; Erik P Castle; Mark L Gonzalgo; Michael E Woods; Robert S Svatek; Alon Z Weizer; Badrinath R Konety; Mathew Tollefson; Tracey L Krupski; Norm D Smith; Ahmad Shabsigh; Daniel A Barocas; Marcus L Quek; Atreya Dash; Adam S Kibel; Raj S Pruthi; Jeffrey Scott Montgomery; Christopher J Weight; David S Sharp; Sam S Chang; Michael S Cookson; Gopal N Gupta; Alex Gorbonos; Edward M Uchio; Eila Skinner; Nachiketh Soodana-Prakash; Maria F Becerra; Sanjaya Swain; Kerri Kendrick; Joseph A Smith; Ian M Thompson; Dipen J Parekh
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2019-09-24       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  Robot-assisted radical cystectomy is a promising alternative to open surgery in the Japanese population with a high rate of octogenarians.

Authors:  Hideto Iwamoto; Tetsuya Yumioka; Noriya Yamaguchi; Toshihiko Masago; Shuichi Morizane; Masashi Honda; Takehiro Sejima; Atsushi Takenaka
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-01-20       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 10.  Is robotic-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) with intracorporeal diversion becoming the new gold standard of care?

Authors:  Hitendra R H Patel; Pedro Bargão Santos; Manuel Castanheira de Oliveira; Stig Müller
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-11-25       Impact factor: 4.226

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.