Literature DB >> 23753843

Adoption of radial access and comparison of outcomes to femoral access in percutaneous coronary intervention: an updated report from the national cardiovascular data registry (2007-2012).

Dmitriy N Feldman1, Rajesh V Swaminathan, Lisa A Kaltenbach, Dmitri V Baklanov, Luke K Kim, S Chiu Wong, Robert M Minutello, John C Messenger, Issam Moussa, Kirk N Garratt, Robert N Piana, William B Hillegass, Mauricio G Cohen, Ian C Gilchrist, Sunil V Rao.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Radial access for percutaneous coronary intervention (r-PCI) is associated with reduced vascular complications; however, previous reports have shown that <2% of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) procedures in the United States are performed via the radial approach. Our aims were to evaluate temporal trends in r-PCI and compare procedural outcomes between r-PCI and transfemoral PCI. METHODS AND
RESULTS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study from the CathPCI registry (n=2 820 874 procedures from 1381 sites) between January 2007 and September 2012. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to evaluate the adjusted association between r-PCI and bleeding, vascular complications, and procedural success, using transfemoral PCI as the reference. Outcomes in high-risk subgroups such as age ≥75 years, women, and patients with acute coronary syndrome were also examined. The proportion of r-PCI procedures increased from 1.2% in quarter 1 2007 to 16.1% in quarter 3 2012 and accounted for 6.3% of total procedures from 2007 to 2012 (n=178 643). After multivariable adjustment, r-PCI use in the studied cohort of patients was associated with lower risk of bleeding (adjusted odds ratio, 0.51; 95% confidence interval, 0.49-0.54) and lower risk of vascular complications (adjusted odds ratio, 0.39; 95% confidence interval, 0.31-0.50) in comparison with transfemoral PCI. The reduction in bleeding and vascular complications was consistent across important subgroups of age, sex, and clinical presentation.
CONCLUSIONS: There has been increasing adoption of r-PCI in the United States. Transradial PCI now accounts for 1 of 6 PCIs performed in contemporary clinical practice. In comparison with traditional femoral access, transradial PCI is associated with lower vascular and bleeding complication rates.

Entities:  

Keywords:  hemmorhage; percutaneous coronary intervention; radial artery; vascular complication

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23753843     DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.000536

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  84 in total

1.  The comparative efficacy of bivalirudin is markedly attenuated by use of radial access: insights from Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan Cardiovascular Consortium.

Authors:  Emily Perdoncin; Milan Seth; Simon Dixon; Louis Cannon; Akshay Khandelwal; Arthur Riba; Shukri David; David Wohns; Hitinder Gurm
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2015-09-15       Impact factor: 29.983

2.  Radial Interventions: Present and Future Indications.

Authors:  Konstantinos V Voudris; Panagiota Georgiadou; Konstantinos Charitakis; Konstantinos Marmagkiolis
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2016-01

3.  Hepatic radioembolization from transradial access: initial experience and comparison to transfemoral access.

Authors:  Bela Kis; Matthew Mills; Sarah E Hoffe
Journal:  Diagn Interv Radiol       Date:  2016 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.630

4.  Medicolegal implications of radial and femoral access for coronary angiography and intervention in 2016: Focus on retroperitoneal hemorrhage.

Authors:  Konstantinos V Voudris; Mladen I Vidovich
Journal:  J Transl Int Med       Date:  2016-04-14

Review 5.  Sex-Based Differences in Chronic Total Occlusion Management.

Authors:  Amy Cheney; Kathleen E Kearney; William Lombardi
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2018-11-07       Impact factor: 5.113

6.  The learning curve for transradial percutaneous coronary intervention among operators in the United States: a study from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry.

Authors:  Connie N Hess; Eric D Peterson; Megan L Neely; David Dai; William B Hillegass; Mitchell W Krucoff; Michael A Kutcher; John C Messenger; Samir Pancholy; Robert N Piana; Sunil V Rao
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2014-04-22       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 7.  Radial artery occlusion after transradial approach to cardiac catheterization.

Authors:  John F Wagener; Sunil V Rao
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 5.113

8.  Nonparametric Bayesian Instrumental Variable Analysis: Evaluating Heterogeneous Effects of Coronary Arterial Access Site Strategies.

Authors:  Samrachana Adhikari; Sherri Rose; Sharon-Lise Normand
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2020-01-03       Impact factor: 5.033

Review 9.  Same day discharge after elective percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  Ian C Gilchrist
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 2.931

10.  Risk factors of failed transradial approach for percutaneous coronary interventions in Chaoshan Chinese: a locally retrospective analysis.

Authors:  Jing Hu; Xiangna Cai; Xin Wang; Lan Chen; Duanmin Xu; Jilin Li
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-07-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.